Cargando…
Sequences, sequence clusters and bacterial species
Whatever else they should share, strains of bacteria assigned to the same species should have house-keeping genes that are similar in sequence. Single gene sequences (or rRNA gene sequences) have very few informative sites to resolve the strains of closely related species, and relationships among si...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1764932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17062411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1917 |
_version_ | 1782131655616495616 |
---|---|
author | Hanage, William P Fraser, Christophe Spratt, Brian G |
author_facet | Hanage, William P Fraser, Christophe Spratt, Brian G |
author_sort | Hanage, William P |
collection | PubMed |
description | Whatever else they should share, strains of bacteria assigned to the same species should have house-keeping genes that are similar in sequence. Single gene sequences (or rRNA gene sequences) have very few informative sites to resolve the strains of closely related species, and relationships among similar species may be confounded by interspecies recombination. A more promising approach (multilocus sequence analysis, MLSA) is to concatenate the sequences of multiple house-keeping loci and to observe the patterns of clustering among large populations of strains of closely related named bacterial species. Recent studies have shown that large populations can be resolved into non-overlapping sequence clusters that agree well with species assigned by the standard microbiological methods. The use of clustering patterns to inform the division of closely related populations into species has many advantages for poorly studied bacteria (or to re-evaluate well-studied species), as it provides a way of recognizing natural discontinuities in the distribution of similar genotypes. Clustering patterns can be used by expert groups as the basis of a pragmatic approach to assigning species, taking into account whatever additional data are available (e.g. similarities in ecology, phenotype and gene content). The development of large MLSA Internet databases provides the ability to assign new strains to previously defined species clusters and an electronic taxonomy. The advantages and problems in using sequence clusters as the basis of species assignments are discussed. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1764932 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-17649322007-09-17 Sequences, sequence clusters and bacterial species Hanage, William P Fraser, Christophe Spratt, Brian G Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Research Article Whatever else they should share, strains of bacteria assigned to the same species should have house-keeping genes that are similar in sequence. Single gene sequences (or rRNA gene sequences) have very few informative sites to resolve the strains of closely related species, and relationships among similar species may be confounded by interspecies recombination. A more promising approach (multilocus sequence analysis, MLSA) is to concatenate the sequences of multiple house-keeping loci and to observe the patterns of clustering among large populations of strains of closely related named bacterial species. Recent studies have shown that large populations can be resolved into non-overlapping sequence clusters that agree well with species assigned by the standard microbiological methods. The use of clustering patterns to inform the division of closely related populations into species has many advantages for poorly studied bacteria (or to re-evaluate well-studied species), as it provides a way of recognizing natural discontinuities in the distribution of similar genotypes. Clustering patterns can be used by expert groups as the basis of a pragmatic approach to assigning species, taking into account whatever additional data are available (e.g. similarities in ecology, phenotype and gene content). The development of large MLSA Internet databases provides the ability to assign new strains to previously defined species clusters and an electronic taxonomy. The advantages and problems in using sequence clusters as the basis of species assignments are discussed. The Royal Society 2006-10-06 2006-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC1764932/ /pubmed/17062411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1917 Text en Copyright © 2006 The Royal Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hanage, William P Fraser, Christophe Spratt, Brian G Sequences, sequence clusters and bacterial species |
title | Sequences, sequence clusters and bacterial species |
title_full | Sequences, sequence clusters and bacterial species |
title_fullStr | Sequences, sequence clusters and bacterial species |
title_full_unstemmed | Sequences, sequence clusters and bacterial species |
title_short | Sequences, sequence clusters and bacterial species |
title_sort | sequences, sequence clusters and bacterial species |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1764932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17062411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1917 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hanagewilliamp sequencessequenceclustersandbacterialspecies AT fraserchristophe sequencessequenceclustersandbacterialspecies AT sprattbriang sequencessequenceclustersandbacterialspecies |