Cargando…

Sequences, sequence clusters and bacterial species

Whatever else they should share, strains of bacteria assigned to the same species should have house-keeping genes that are similar in sequence. Single gene sequences (or rRNA gene sequences) have very few informative sites to resolve the strains of closely related species, and relationships among si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hanage, William P, Fraser, Christophe, Spratt, Brian G
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1764932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17062411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1917
_version_ 1782131655616495616
author Hanage, William P
Fraser, Christophe
Spratt, Brian G
author_facet Hanage, William P
Fraser, Christophe
Spratt, Brian G
author_sort Hanage, William P
collection PubMed
description Whatever else they should share, strains of bacteria assigned to the same species should have house-keeping genes that are similar in sequence. Single gene sequences (or rRNA gene sequences) have very few informative sites to resolve the strains of closely related species, and relationships among similar species may be confounded by interspecies recombination. A more promising approach (multilocus sequence analysis, MLSA) is to concatenate the sequences of multiple house-keeping loci and to observe the patterns of clustering among large populations of strains of closely related named bacterial species. Recent studies have shown that large populations can be resolved into non-overlapping sequence clusters that agree well with species assigned by the standard microbiological methods. The use of clustering patterns to inform the division of closely related populations into species has many advantages for poorly studied bacteria (or to re-evaluate well-studied species), as it provides a way of recognizing natural discontinuities in the distribution of similar genotypes. Clustering patterns can be used by expert groups as the basis of a pragmatic approach to assigning species, taking into account whatever additional data are available (e.g. similarities in ecology, phenotype and gene content). The development of large MLSA Internet databases provides the ability to assign new strains to previously defined species clusters and an electronic taxonomy. The advantages and problems in using sequence clusters as the basis of species assignments are discussed.
format Text
id pubmed-1764932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-17649322007-09-17 Sequences, sequence clusters and bacterial species Hanage, William P Fraser, Christophe Spratt, Brian G Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Research Article Whatever else they should share, strains of bacteria assigned to the same species should have house-keeping genes that are similar in sequence. Single gene sequences (or rRNA gene sequences) have very few informative sites to resolve the strains of closely related species, and relationships among similar species may be confounded by interspecies recombination. A more promising approach (multilocus sequence analysis, MLSA) is to concatenate the sequences of multiple house-keeping loci and to observe the patterns of clustering among large populations of strains of closely related named bacterial species. Recent studies have shown that large populations can be resolved into non-overlapping sequence clusters that agree well with species assigned by the standard microbiological methods. The use of clustering patterns to inform the division of closely related populations into species has many advantages for poorly studied bacteria (or to re-evaluate well-studied species), as it provides a way of recognizing natural discontinuities in the distribution of similar genotypes. Clustering patterns can be used by expert groups as the basis of a pragmatic approach to assigning species, taking into account whatever additional data are available (e.g. similarities in ecology, phenotype and gene content). The development of large MLSA Internet databases provides the ability to assign new strains to previously defined species clusters and an electronic taxonomy. The advantages and problems in using sequence clusters as the basis of species assignments are discussed. The Royal Society 2006-10-06 2006-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC1764932/ /pubmed/17062411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1917 Text en Copyright © 2006 The Royal Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hanage, William P
Fraser, Christophe
Spratt, Brian G
Sequences, sequence clusters and bacterial species
title Sequences, sequence clusters and bacterial species
title_full Sequences, sequence clusters and bacterial species
title_fullStr Sequences, sequence clusters and bacterial species
title_full_unstemmed Sequences, sequence clusters and bacterial species
title_short Sequences, sequence clusters and bacterial species
title_sort sequences, sequence clusters and bacterial species
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1764932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17062411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1917
work_keys_str_mv AT hanagewilliamp sequencessequenceclustersandbacterialspecies
AT fraserchristophe sequencessequenceclustersandbacterialspecies
AT sprattbriang sequencessequenceclustersandbacterialspecies