Cargando…

An economic perspective on Malawi's medical "brain drain"

BACKGROUND: The medical "brain drain" has been described as rich countries "looting" doctors and nurses from developing countries undermining their health systems and public health. However this "brain-drain" might also be seen as a success in the training and "exp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Record, Richard, Mohiddin, Abdu
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1769362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17176457
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-2-12
_version_ 1782131676203188224
author Record, Richard
Mohiddin, Abdu
author_facet Record, Richard
Mohiddin, Abdu
author_sort Record, Richard
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The medical "brain drain" has been described as rich countries "looting" doctors and nurses from developing countries undermining their health systems and public health. However this "brain-drain" might also be seen as a success in the training and "export" of health professionals and the benefits this provides. This paper illustrates the arguments and possible policy options by focusing on the situation in one of the poorest countries in the world, Malawi. DISCUSSION: Many see this "brain drain" of medical staff as wrong with developed countries exploiting poorer ones. The effects are considerable with Malawi facing high vacancy rates in its public health system, and with migration threatening to outstrip training despite efforts to improve pay and conditions. This shortage of staff has made it more challenging for Malawi to deliver on its Essential Health Package and to absorb new international health funding. Yet, without any policy effort Malawi has been able to demonstrate its global competitiveness in the training ("production") of skilled health professionals. Remittances from migration are a large and growing source of foreign exchange for poor countries and tend to go directly to households. Whilst the data for Malawi is limited, studies from other poor countries demonstrate the power of remittances in significantly reducing poverty. Malawi can benefit from the export of health professionals provided there is a resolution of the situation whereby the state pays for training and the benefits are gained by the individual professional working abroad. Solutions include migrating staff paying back training costs, or rich host governments remitting part of a tax (e.g. income or national insurance) to the Malawi government. These schemes would allow Malawi to scale up training of health professionals for local needs and to work abroad. SUMMARY: There is concern about the negative impacts of the medical "brain-drain". However a closer look at the evidence for and against the medical "brain-drain" in Malawi suggests that there are potential gains in managing medical migration to produce outcomes that are beneficial to individuals, households and the country. Finally we present several policy options.
format Text
id pubmed-1769362
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-17693622007-01-13 An economic perspective on Malawi's medical "brain drain" Record, Richard Mohiddin, Abdu Global Health Debate BACKGROUND: The medical "brain drain" has been described as rich countries "looting" doctors and nurses from developing countries undermining their health systems and public health. However this "brain-drain" might also be seen as a success in the training and "export" of health professionals and the benefits this provides. This paper illustrates the arguments and possible policy options by focusing on the situation in one of the poorest countries in the world, Malawi. DISCUSSION: Many see this "brain drain" of medical staff as wrong with developed countries exploiting poorer ones. The effects are considerable with Malawi facing high vacancy rates in its public health system, and with migration threatening to outstrip training despite efforts to improve pay and conditions. This shortage of staff has made it more challenging for Malawi to deliver on its Essential Health Package and to absorb new international health funding. Yet, without any policy effort Malawi has been able to demonstrate its global competitiveness in the training ("production") of skilled health professionals. Remittances from migration are a large and growing source of foreign exchange for poor countries and tend to go directly to households. Whilst the data for Malawi is limited, studies from other poor countries demonstrate the power of remittances in significantly reducing poverty. Malawi can benefit from the export of health professionals provided there is a resolution of the situation whereby the state pays for training and the benefits are gained by the individual professional working abroad. Solutions include migrating staff paying back training costs, or rich host governments remitting part of a tax (e.g. income or national insurance) to the Malawi government. These schemes would allow Malawi to scale up training of health professionals for local needs and to work abroad. SUMMARY: There is concern about the negative impacts of the medical "brain-drain". However a closer look at the evidence for and against the medical "brain-drain" in Malawi suggests that there are potential gains in managing medical migration to produce outcomes that are beneficial to individuals, households and the country. Finally we present several policy options. BioMed Central 2006-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC1769362/ /pubmed/17176457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-2-12 Text en Copyright © 2006 Record and Mohiddin; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Debate
Record, Richard
Mohiddin, Abdu
An economic perspective on Malawi's medical "brain drain"
title An economic perspective on Malawi's medical "brain drain"
title_full An economic perspective on Malawi's medical "brain drain"
title_fullStr An economic perspective on Malawi's medical "brain drain"
title_full_unstemmed An economic perspective on Malawi's medical "brain drain"
title_short An economic perspective on Malawi's medical "brain drain"
title_sort economic perspective on malawi's medical "brain drain"
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1769362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17176457
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-2-12
work_keys_str_mv AT recordrichard aneconomicperspectiveonmalawismedicalbraindrain
AT mohiddinabdu aneconomicperspectiveonmalawismedicalbraindrain
AT recordrichard economicperspectiveonmalawismedicalbraindrain
AT mohiddinabdu economicperspectiveonmalawismedicalbraindrain