Cargando…
Detection of transcriptional difference of porcine imprinted genes using different microarray platforms
BACKGROUND: Presently, multiple options exist for conducting gene expression profiling studies in swine. In order to determine the performance of some of the existing microarrays, Affymetrix Porcine, Affymetrix Human U133+2.0, and the U.S. Pig Genome Coordination Program spotted glass oligonucleotid...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1769376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17194308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-7-328 |
_version_ | 1782131680224477184 |
---|---|
author | Tsai, Shengdar Mir, Bashir Martin, Amy C Estrada, Jose L Bischoff, Steve R Hsieh, Wen-ping Cassady, Joseph P Freking, Bradley A Nonneman, Dan J Rohrer, Gary A Piedrahita, Jorge A |
author_facet | Tsai, Shengdar Mir, Bashir Martin, Amy C Estrada, Jose L Bischoff, Steve R Hsieh, Wen-ping Cassady, Joseph P Freking, Bradley A Nonneman, Dan J Rohrer, Gary A Piedrahita, Jorge A |
author_sort | Tsai, Shengdar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Presently, multiple options exist for conducting gene expression profiling studies in swine. In order to determine the performance of some of the existing microarrays, Affymetrix Porcine, Affymetrix Human U133+2.0, and the U.S. Pig Genome Coordination Program spotted glass oligonucleotide microarrays were compared for their reproducibility, coverage, platform independent and dependent sensitivity using fibroblast cell lines derived from control and parthenogenic porcine embryos. RESULTS: Array group correlations between technical replicates demonstrated comparable reproducibility in both Affymetrix arrays. Glass oligonucleotide arrays showed greater variability and, in addition, approximately 10% of probes had to be discarded due to slide printing defects. Probe level analysis of Affymetrix Human arrays revealed significant variability within probe sets due to the effects of cross-species hybridization. Affymetrix Porcine arrays identified the greatest number of differentially expressed genes amongst probes common to all arrays, a measure of platform sensitivity. Affymetrix Porcine arrays also identified the greatest number of differentially expressed known imprinted genes using all probes on each array, an ad hoc measure of realistic performance for this particular experiment. CONCLUSION: We conclude that of the platforms currently available and tested, the Affymetrix Porcine array is the most sensitive and reproducible microarray for swine genomic studies. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1769376 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-17693762007-01-16 Detection of transcriptional difference of porcine imprinted genes using different microarray platforms Tsai, Shengdar Mir, Bashir Martin, Amy C Estrada, Jose L Bischoff, Steve R Hsieh, Wen-ping Cassady, Joseph P Freking, Bradley A Nonneman, Dan J Rohrer, Gary A Piedrahita, Jorge A BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Presently, multiple options exist for conducting gene expression profiling studies in swine. In order to determine the performance of some of the existing microarrays, Affymetrix Porcine, Affymetrix Human U133+2.0, and the U.S. Pig Genome Coordination Program spotted glass oligonucleotide microarrays were compared for their reproducibility, coverage, platform independent and dependent sensitivity using fibroblast cell lines derived from control and parthenogenic porcine embryos. RESULTS: Array group correlations between technical replicates demonstrated comparable reproducibility in both Affymetrix arrays. Glass oligonucleotide arrays showed greater variability and, in addition, approximately 10% of probes had to be discarded due to slide printing defects. Probe level analysis of Affymetrix Human arrays revealed significant variability within probe sets due to the effects of cross-species hybridization. Affymetrix Porcine arrays identified the greatest number of differentially expressed genes amongst probes common to all arrays, a measure of platform sensitivity. Affymetrix Porcine arrays also identified the greatest number of differentially expressed known imprinted genes using all probes on each array, an ad hoc measure of realistic performance for this particular experiment. CONCLUSION: We conclude that of the platforms currently available and tested, the Affymetrix Porcine array is the most sensitive and reproducible microarray for swine genomic studies. BioMed Central 2006-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC1769376/ /pubmed/17194308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-7-328 Text en Copyright © 2006 Tsai et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tsai, Shengdar Mir, Bashir Martin, Amy C Estrada, Jose L Bischoff, Steve R Hsieh, Wen-ping Cassady, Joseph P Freking, Bradley A Nonneman, Dan J Rohrer, Gary A Piedrahita, Jorge A Detection of transcriptional difference of porcine imprinted genes using different microarray platforms |
title | Detection of transcriptional difference of porcine imprinted genes using different microarray platforms |
title_full | Detection of transcriptional difference of porcine imprinted genes using different microarray platforms |
title_fullStr | Detection of transcriptional difference of porcine imprinted genes using different microarray platforms |
title_full_unstemmed | Detection of transcriptional difference of porcine imprinted genes using different microarray platforms |
title_short | Detection of transcriptional difference of porcine imprinted genes using different microarray platforms |
title_sort | detection of transcriptional difference of porcine imprinted genes using different microarray platforms |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1769376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17194308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-7-328 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tsaishengdar detectionoftranscriptionaldifferenceofporcineimprintedgenesusingdifferentmicroarrayplatforms AT mirbashir detectionoftranscriptionaldifferenceofporcineimprintedgenesusingdifferentmicroarrayplatforms AT martinamyc detectionoftranscriptionaldifferenceofporcineimprintedgenesusingdifferentmicroarrayplatforms AT estradajosel detectionoftranscriptionaldifferenceofporcineimprintedgenesusingdifferentmicroarrayplatforms AT bischoffstever detectionoftranscriptionaldifferenceofporcineimprintedgenesusingdifferentmicroarrayplatforms AT hsiehwenping detectionoftranscriptionaldifferenceofporcineimprintedgenesusingdifferentmicroarrayplatforms AT cassadyjosephp detectionoftranscriptionaldifferenceofporcineimprintedgenesusingdifferentmicroarrayplatforms AT frekingbradleya detectionoftranscriptionaldifferenceofporcineimprintedgenesusingdifferentmicroarrayplatforms AT nonnemandanj detectionoftranscriptionaldifferenceofporcineimprintedgenesusingdifferentmicroarrayplatforms AT rohrergarya detectionoftranscriptionaldifferenceofporcineimprintedgenesusingdifferentmicroarrayplatforms AT piedrahitajorgea detectionoftranscriptionaldifferenceofporcineimprintedgenesusingdifferentmicroarrayplatforms |