Cargando…

An ecometric analysis of neighbourhood cohesion

BACKGROUND: It is widely believed that the social environment has an important influence on health, but there is less certainty about how to measure specific factors within the social environment that could link the neighbourhood of residence to a health outcome. The objectives of the study were to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fone, David L, Farewell, Daniel M, Dunstan, Frank D
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1769397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17184538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-4-17
_version_ 1782131685993742336
author Fone, David L
Farewell, Daniel M
Dunstan, Frank D
author_facet Fone, David L
Farewell, Daniel M
Dunstan, Frank D
author_sort Fone, David L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is widely believed that the social environment has an important influence on health, but there is less certainty about how to measure specific factors within the social environment that could link the neighbourhood of residence to a health outcome. The objectives of the study were to examine the underlying constructs captured by an adapted version of Buckner's neighbourhood cohesion scale, and to assess the reliability of the scale at the small-area-level by combining ecometric methodology with ordinal modelling of a five-point scale. METHODS: Data were analysed from 11,078 participants in the Caerphilly Health and Social Needs Study, who were sampled from within 325 UK census enumeration districts in Caerphilly county borough, Wales, UK. The responses of interest came from 15 question items designed to capture different facets of neighbourhood cohesion. Factor analysis was used to identify constructs underlying the neighbourhood cohesion item responses. Using a multilevel ecometric model, the variability present in these ordinal responses was decomposed into contextual, compositional, item-level and residual components. RESULTS: Two constructs labelled neighbourhood belonging and social cohesion were identified, and variability in both constructs was modelled at each level of the multilevel structure. The intra-neighbourhood correlations were 6.4% and 1.0% for the neighbourhood belonging and social cohesion subscales, respectively. Given the large sample size, contextual neighbourhood cohesion scores can be estimated reliably. The wide variation in the observed frequency of occurence of the scale item activities suggests that the two subscales have desirable ecometric properties. Further, the majority of between-neighbourhood variation is not explained by the socio-demographic characteristics of the individual respondents. CONCLUSION: Assessment of the properties of the adapted neighbourhood cohesion scale using factor analysis and ecometric analysis extended to an ordinal scale has shown that the items allow fine discrimination between individuals. However, large sample sizes are needed in order to accurately estimate contextual neighbourhood cohesion. The scale is therefore appropriate for use in the measurement of neighbourhood cohesion at small-area-level in future studies of neighbourhoods and health.
format Text
id pubmed-1769397
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-17693972007-01-16 An ecometric analysis of neighbourhood cohesion Fone, David L Farewell, Daniel M Dunstan, Frank D Popul Health Metr Research BACKGROUND: It is widely believed that the social environment has an important influence on health, but there is less certainty about how to measure specific factors within the social environment that could link the neighbourhood of residence to a health outcome. The objectives of the study were to examine the underlying constructs captured by an adapted version of Buckner's neighbourhood cohesion scale, and to assess the reliability of the scale at the small-area-level by combining ecometric methodology with ordinal modelling of a five-point scale. METHODS: Data were analysed from 11,078 participants in the Caerphilly Health and Social Needs Study, who were sampled from within 325 UK census enumeration districts in Caerphilly county borough, Wales, UK. The responses of interest came from 15 question items designed to capture different facets of neighbourhood cohesion. Factor analysis was used to identify constructs underlying the neighbourhood cohesion item responses. Using a multilevel ecometric model, the variability present in these ordinal responses was decomposed into contextual, compositional, item-level and residual components. RESULTS: Two constructs labelled neighbourhood belonging and social cohesion were identified, and variability in both constructs was modelled at each level of the multilevel structure. The intra-neighbourhood correlations were 6.4% and 1.0% for the neighbourhood belonging and social cohesion subscales, respectively. Given the large sample size, contextual neighbourhood cohesion scores can be estimated reliably. The wide variation in the observed frequency of occurence of the scale item activities suggests that the two subscales have desirable ecometric properties. Further, the majority of between-neighbourhood variation is not explained by the socio-demographic characteristics of the individual respondents. CONCLUSION: Assessment of the properties of the adapted neighbourhood cohesion scale using factor analysis and ecometric analysis extended to an ordinal scale has shown that the items allow fine discrimination between individuals. However, large sample sizes are needed in order to accurately estimate contextual neighbourhood cohesion. The scale is therefore appropriate for use in the measurement of neighbourhood cohesion at small-area-level in future studies of neighbourhoods and health. BioMed Central 2006-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC1769397/ /pubmed/17184538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-4-17 Text en Copyright © 2006 Fone et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Fone, David L
Farewell, Daniel M
Dunstan, Frank D
An ecometric analysis of neighbourhood cohesion
title An ecometric analysis of neighbourhood cohesion
title_full An ecometric analysis of neighbourhood cohesion
title_fullStr An ecometric analysis of neighbourhood cohesion
title_full_unstemmed An ecometric analysis of neighbourhood cohesion
title_short An ecometric analysis of neighbourhood cohesion
title_sort ecometric analysis of neighbourhood cohesion
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1769397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17184538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-4-17
work_keys_str_mv AT fonedavidl anecometricanalysisofneighbourhoodcohesion
AT farewelldanielm anecometricanalysisofneighbourhoodcohesion
AT dunstanfrankd anecometricanalysisofneighbourhoodcohesion
AT fonedavidl ecometricanalysisofneighbourhoodcohesion
AT farewelldanielm ecometricanalysisofneighbourhoodcohesion
AT dunstanfrankd ecometricanalysisofneighbourhoodcohesion