Cargando…

Rates and Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening

INTRODUCTION: Despite widespread recommendations for colorectal cancer screening, the U.S. screening rate is low. The objectives of this study were to describe the rates and predictors of colorectal cancer screening use by examining groups in two categories — 1) those who have ever been screened and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liang, Su-Ying, Phillips, Kathryn A, Nagamine, Mika, Ladabaum, Uri, Haas, Jennifer S
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1779281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16978492
_version_ 1782131742154424320
author Liang, Su-Ying
Phillips, Kathryn A
Nagamine, Mika
Ladabaum, Uri
Haas, Jennifer S
author_facet Liang, Su-Ying
Phillips, Kathryn A
Nagamine, Mika
Ladabaum, Uri
Haas, Jennifer S
author_sort Liang, Su-Ying
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Despite widespread recommendations for colorectal cancer screening, the U.S. screening rate is low. The objectives of this study were to describe the rates and predictors of colorectal cancer screening use by examining groups in two categories — 1) those who have ever been screened and 2) those with up-to-date screening — and to assess whether trends and predictors change over time. METHODS: We analyzed data from the 2000 and 2003 National Health Interview Surveys about the use of fecal occult blood tests, sigmoidoscopies, and colonoscopies for adults aged 50 years and older and without a history of colorectal cancer (N = 11,574 in 2000 and N = 11,779 in 2003).  RESULTS: Rates in the 2000 study population of those who have ever been screened for colorectal cancer (53%) had increased in the 2003 study population (55%) as had the rates in the 2003 study population of those with up-to-date colorectal screening (53%) compared with the rates in the 2000 study population (38%). Among those who were ever screened, 76% were up-to-date with screening in 2003, compared with 68% in 2000. There was increased use of colonoscopies but decreased use of fecal occult blood tests and sigmoidoscopies. Individuals were more likely to be up-to-date with screening if they had higher income, higher education, insurance coverage, a usual source of care, and a dental visit in the last year than if these predictors were not evident. Since 2000, these predictors of colorectal cancer screening use have remained stable. CONCLUSION: Although there has been relatively limited success in increasing overall screening, it is encouraging that most people in the group of those who have ever been screened are up-to-date with colorectal cancer screening. Predictors for colorectal screening were stable over time despite changes in screening policies and rates. Further research is needed to uncover barriers to colorectal cancer screening.
format Text
id pubmed-1779281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-17792812007-02-01 Rates and Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening Liang, Su-Ying Phillips, Kathryn A Nagamine, Mika Ladabaum, Uri Haas, Jennifer S Prev Chronic Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: Despite widespread recommendations for colorectal cancer screening, the U.S. screening rate is low. The objectives of this study were to describe the rates and predictors of colorectal cancer screening use by examining groups in two categories — 1) those who have ever been screened and 2) those with up-to-date screening — and to assess whether trends and predictors change over time. METHODS: We analyzed data from the 2000 and 2003 National Health Interview Surveys about the use of fecal occult blood tests, sigmoidoscopies, and colonoscopies for adults aged 50 years and older and without a history of colorectal cancer (N = 11,574 in 2000 and N = 11,779 in 2003).  RESULTS: Rates in the 2000 study population of those who have ever been screened for colorectal cancer (53%) had increased in the 2003 study population (55%) as had the rates in the 2003 study population of those with up-to-date colorectal screening (53%) compared with the rates in the 2000 study population (38%). Among those who were ever screened, 76% were up-to-date with screening in 2003, compared with 68% in 2000. There was increased use of colonoscopies but decreased use of fecal occult blood tests and sigmoidoscopies. Individuals were more likely to be up-to-date with screening if they had higher income, higher education, insurance coverage, a usual source of care, and a dental visit in the last year than if these predictors were not evident. Since 2000, these predictors of colorectal cancer screening use have remained stable. CONCLUSION: Although there has been relatively limited success in increasing overall screening, it is encouraging that most people in the group of those who have ever been screened are up-to-date with colorectal cancer screening. Predictors for colorectal screening were stable over time despite changes in screening policies and rates. Further research is needed to uncover barriers to colorectal cancer screening. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2006-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC1779281/ /pubmed/16978492 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Liang, Su-Ying
Phillips, Kathryn A
Nagamine, Mika
Ladabaum, Uri
Haas, Jennifer S
Rates and Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening
title Rates and Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening
title_full Rates and Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening
title_fullStr Rates and Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening
title_full_unstemmed Rates and Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening
title_short Rates and Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening
title_sort rates and predictors of colorectal cancer screening
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1779281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16978492
work_keys_str_mv AT liangsuying ratesandpredictorsofcolorectalcancerscreening
AT phillipskathryna ratesandpredictorsofcolorectalcancerscreening
AT nagaminemika ratesandpredictorsofcolorectalcancerscreening
AT ladabaumuri ratesandpredictorsofcolorectalcancerscreening
AT haasjennifers ratesandpredictorsofcolorectalcancerscreening