Cargando…

Comparative genomics of Drosophila and human core promoters

BACKGROUND: The core promoter region plays a critical role in the regulation of eukaryotic gene expression. We have determined the non-random distribution of DNA sequences relative to the transcriptional start site in Drosophila melanogaster promoters to identify sequences that may be biologically s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: FitzGerald, Peter C, Sturgill, David, Shyakhtenko, Andrey, Oliver, Brian, Vinson, Charles
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1779564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16827941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2006-7-7-r53
_version_ 1782131805060595712
author FitzGerald, Peter C
Sturgill, David
Shyakhtenko, Andrey
Oliver, Brian
Vinson, Charles
author_facet FitzGerald, Peter C
Sturgill, David
Shyakhtenko, Andrey
Oliver, Brian
Vinson, Charles
author_sort FitzGerald, Peter C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The core promoter region plays a critical role in the regulation of eukaryotic gene expression. We have determined the non-random distribution of DNA sequences relative to the transcriptional start site in Drosophila melanogaster promoters to identify sequences that may be biologically significant. We compare these results with those obtained for human promoters. RESULTS: We determined the distribution of all 65,536 octamer (8-mers) DNA sequences in 10,914 Drosophila promoters and two sets of human promoters aligned relative to the transcriptional start site. In Drosophila, 298 8-mers have highly significant (p ≤ 1 × 10(-16)) non-random distributions peaking within 100 base-pairs of the transcriptional start site. These sequences were grouped into 15 DNA motifs. Ten motifs, termed directional motifs, occur only on the positive strand while the remaining five motifs, termed non-directional motifs, occur on both strands. The only directional motifs to localize in human promoters are TATA, INR, and DPE. The directional motifs were further subdivided into those precisely positioned relative to the transcriptional start site and those that are positioned more loosely relative to the transcriptional start site. Similar numbers of non-directional motifs were identified in both species and most are different. The genes associated with all 15 DNA motifs, when they occur in the peak, are enriched in specific Gene Ontology categories and show a distinct mRNA expression pattern, suggesting that there is a core promoter code in Drosophila. CONCLUSION: Drosophila and human promoters use different DNA sequences to regulate gene expression, supporting the idea that evolution occurs by the modulation of gene regulation.
format Text
id pubmed-1779564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-17795642007-01-19 Comparative genomics of Drosophila and human core promoters FitzGerald, Peter C Sturgill, David Shyakhtenko, Andrey Oliver, Brian Vinson, Charles Genome Biol Research BACKGROUND: The core promoter region plays a critical role in the regulation of eukaryotic gene expression. We have determined the non-random distribution of DNA sequences relative to the transcriptional start site in Drosophila melanogaster promoters to identify sequences that may be biologically significant. We compare these results with those obtained for human promoters. RESULTS: We determined the distribution of all 65,536 octamer (8-mers) DNA sequences in 10,914 Drosophila promoters and two sets of human promoters aligned relative to the transcriptional start site. In Drosophila, 298 8-mers have highly significant (p ≤ 1 × 10(-16)) non-random distributions peaking within 100 base-pairs of the transcriptional start site. These sequences were grouped into 15 DNA motifs. Ten motifs, termed directional motifs, occur only on the positive strand while the remaining five motifs, termed non-directional motifs, occur on both strands. The only directional motifs to localize in human promoters are TATA, INR, and DPE. The directional motifs were further subdivided into those precisely positioned relative to the transcriptional start site and those that are positioned more loosely relative to the transcriptional start site. Similar numbers of non-directional motifs were identified in both species and most are different. The genes associated with all 15 DNA motifs, when they occur in the peak, are enriched in specific Gene Ontology categories and show a distinct mRNA expression pattern, suggesting that there is a core promoter code in Drosophila. CONCLUSION: Drosophila and human promoters use different DNA sequences to regulate gene expression, supporting the idea that evolution occurs by the modulation of gene regulation. BioMed Central 2006 2006-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC1779564/ /pubmed/16827941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2006-7-7-r53 Text en Copyright © 2006 FitzGerald et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
FitzGerald, Peter C
Sturgill, David
Shyakhtenko, Andrey
Oliver, Brian
Vinson, Charles
Comparative genomics of Drosophila and human core promoters
title Comparative genomics of Drosophila and human core promoters
title_full Comparative genomics of Drosophila and human core promoters
title_fullStr Comparative genomics of Drosophila and human core promoters
title_full_unstemmed Comparative genomics of Drosophila and human core promoters
title_short Comparative genomics of Drosophila and human core promoters
title_sort comparative genomics of drosophila and human core promoters
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1779564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16827941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2006-7-7-r53
work_keys_str_mv AT fitzgeraldpeterc comparativegenomicsofdrosophilaandhumancorepromoters
AT sturgilldavid comparativegenomicsofdrosophilaandhumancorepromoters
AT shyakhtenkoandrey comparativegenomicsofdrosophilaandhumancorepromoters
AT oliverbrian comparativegenomicsofdrosophilaandhumancorepromoters
AT vinsoncharles comparativegenomicsofdrosophilaandhumancorepromoters