Cargando…

Effectiveness of computer-navigated minimally invasive total hip surgery compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty: design of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Moderate to severe osteoarthrosis is the most common indication for Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). Minimally Invasive Total Hip Surgery (MIS) and computer-navigated surgery were introduced several years ago. However, the literature lacks well-designed studies that provide evidence of supe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reininga, Inge HF, Wagenmakers, Robert, van den Akker-Scheek, Inge, Stant, A Dennis, Groothoff, Johan W, Bulstra, Sjoerd K, Zijlstra, Wiebren, Stevens, Martin
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1781447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17214906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-4
_version_ 1782131881330868224
author Reininga, Inge HF
Wagenmakers, Robert
van den Akker-Scheek, Inge
Stant, A Dennis
Groothoff, Johan W
Bulstra, Sjoerd K
Zijlstra, Wiebren
Stevens, Martin
author_facet Reininga, Inge HF
Wagenmakers, Robert
van den Akker-Scheek, Inge
Stant, A Dennis
Groothoff, Johan W
Bulstra, Sjoerd K
Zijlstra, Wiebren
Stevens, Martin
author_sort Reininga, Inge HF
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Moderate to severe osteoarthrosis is the most common indication for Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). Minimally Invasive Total Hip Surgery (MIS) and computer-navigated surgery were introduced several years ago. However, the literature lacks well-designed studies that provide evidence of superiority of computer-navigated MIS over a conventional THA technique. Hence, the purpose of this study is to compare (cost)effectiveness of computer-navigated MIS with a conventional technique for THA. It is our hypothesis that computer-navigated MIS will lead to a quicker recovery during the early postoperative period (3 months), and to an outcome at least as good 6 months postoperatively. We also hypothesize that computer-navigated MIS leads to fewer perioperative complications and better prosthesis positioning. Furthermore, cost advantages of computer-navigated MIS over conventional THA technique are expected. METHODS/DESIGN: A cluster randomized controlled trial will be executed. Patients between the ages of 18 and 75 admitted for primary cementless unilateral THA will be included. Patients will be stratified using the Charnley classification. They will be randomly allocated to have computer-navigated MIS or conventional THA technique. Measurements take place preoperatively, perioperatively, and 6 weeks and 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Degree of limping (gait analysis), self-reported functional status and health-related quality of life (questionnaires) will be assessed preoperatively as well as postoperatively. Perioperative complications will be registered. Radiographic evaluation of prosthesis positioning will take place 6 weeks postoperatively. An evaluation of costs within and outside the healthcare sector will focus on differences in costs between computer-navigated MIS and conventional THA technique. DISCUSSION: Based on studies performed so far, few objective data quantifying the risks and benefits of computer-navigated MIS are available. Therefore, this study has been designed to compare (cost) effectiveness of computer-navigated MIS with a conventional technique for THA. The results of this trial will be presented as soon as they become available.
format Text
id pubmed-1781447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-17814472007-01-25 Effectiveness of computer-navigated minimally invasive total hip surgery compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty: design of a randomized controlled trial Reininga, Inge HF Wagenmakers, Robert van den Akker-Scheek, Inge Stant, A Dennis Groothoff, Johan W Bulstra, Sjoerd K Zijlstra, Wiebren Stevens, Martin BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Moderate to severe osteoarthrosis is the most common indication for Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). Minimally Invasive Total Hip Surgery (MIS) and computer-navigated surgery were introduced several years ago. However, the literature lacks well-designed studies that provide evidence of superiority of computer-navigated MIS over a conventional THA technique. Hence, the purpose of this study is to compare (cost)effectiveness of computer-navigated MIS with a conventional technique for THA. It is our hypothesis that computer-navigated MIS will lead to a quicker recovery during the early postoperative period (3 months), and to an outcome at least as good 6 months postoperatively. We also hypothesize that computer-navigated MIS leads to fewer perioperative complications and better prosthesis positioning. Furthermore, cost advantages of computer-navigated MIS over conventional THA technique are expected. METHODS/DESIGN: A cluster randomized controlled trial will be executed. Patients between the ages of 18 and 75 admitted for primary cementless unilateral THA will be included. Patients will be stratified using the Charnley classification. They will be randomly allocated to have computer-navigated MIS or conventional THA technique. Measurements take place preoperatively, perioperatively, and 6 weeks and 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Degree of limping (gait analysis), self-reported functional status and health-related quality of life (questionnaires) will be assessed preoperatively as well as postoperatively. Perioperative complications will be registered. Radiographic evaluation of prosthesis positioning will take place 6 weeks postoperatively. An evaluation of costs within and outside the healthcare sector will focus on differences in costs between computer-navigated MIS and conventional THA technique. DISCUSSION: Based on studies performed so far, few objective data quantifying the risks and benefits of computer-navigated MIS are available. Therefore, this study has been designed to compare (cost) effectiveness of computer-navigated MIS with a conventional technique for THA. The results of this trial will be presented as soon as they become available. BioMed Central 2007-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC1781447/ /pubmed/17214906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-4 Text en Copyright © 2007 Reininga et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Reininga, Inge HF
Wagenmakers, Robert
van den Akker-Scheek, Inge
Stant, A Dennis
Groothoff, Johan W
Bulstra, Sjoerd K
Zijlstra, Wiebren
Stevens, Martin
Effectiveness of computer-navigated minimally invasive total hip surgery compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty: design of a randomized controlled trial
title Effectiveness of computer-navigated minimally invasive total hip surgery compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty: design of a randomized controlled trial
title_full Effectiveness of computer-navigated minimally invasive total hip surgery compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty: design of a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of computer-navigated minimally invasive total hip surgery compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty: design of a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of computer-navigated minimally invasive total hip surgery compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty: design of a randomized controlled trial
title_short Effectiveness of computer-navigated minimally invasive total hip surgery compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty: design of a randomized controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness of computer-navigated minimally invasive total hip surgery compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty: design of a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1781447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17214906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-4
work_keys_str_mv AT reiningaingehf effectivenessofcomputernavigatedminimallyinvasivetotalhipsurgerycomparedtoconventionaltotalhiparthroplastydesignofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wagenmakersrobert effectivenessofcomputernavigatedminimallyinvasivetotalhipsurgerycomparedtoconventionaltotalhiparthroplastydesignofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vandenakkerscheekinge effectivenessofcomputernavigatedminimallyinvasivetotalhipsurgerycomparedtoconventionaltotalhiparthroplastydesignofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT stantadennis effectivenessofcomputernavigatedminimallyinvasivetotalhipsurgerycomparedtoconventionaltotalhiparthroplastydesignofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT groothoffjohanw effectivenessofcomputernavigatedminimallyinvasivetotalhipsurgerycomparedtoconventionaltotalhiparthroplastydesignofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bulstrasjoerdk effectivenessofcomputernavigatedminimallyinvasivetotalhipsurgerycomparedtoconventionaltotalhiparthroplastydesignofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zijlstrawiebren effectivenessofcomputernavigatedminimallyinvasivetotalhipsurgerycomparedtoconventionaltotalhiparthroplastydesignofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT stevensmartin effectivenessofcomputernavigatedminimallyinvasivetotalhipsurgerycomparedtoconventionaltotalhiparthroplastydesignofarandomizedcontrolledtrial