Cargando…
Effectiveness of computer-navigated minimally invasive total hip surgery compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty: design of a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Moderate to severe osteoarthrosis is the most common indication for Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). Minimally Invasive Total Hip Surgery (MIS) and computer-navigated surgery were introduced several years ago. However, the literature lacks well-designed studies that provide evidence of supe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1781447/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17214906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-4 |
_version_ | 1782131881330868224 |
---|---|
author | Reininga, Inge HF Wagenmakers, Robert van den Akker-Scheek, Inge Stant, A Dennis Groothoff, Johan W Bulstra, Sjoerd K Zijlstra, Wiebren Stevens, Martin |
author_facet | Reininga, Inge HF Wagenmakers, Robert van den Akker-Scheek, Inge Stant, A Dennis Groothoff, Johan W Bulstra, Sjoerd K Zijlstra, Wiebren Stevens, Martin |
author_sort | Reininga, Inge HF |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Moderate to severe osteoarthrosis is the most common indication for Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). Minimally Invasive Total Hip Surgery (MIS) and computer-navigated surgery were introduced several years ago. However, the literature lacks well-designed studies that provide evidence of superiority of computer-navigated MIS over a conventional THA technique. Hence, the purpose of this study is to compare (cost)effectiveness of computer-navigated MIS with a conventional technique for THA. It is our hypothesis that computer-navigated MIS will lead to a quicker recovery during the early postoperative period (3 months), and to an outcome at least as good 6 months postoperatively. We also hypothesize that computer-navigated MIS leads to fewer perioperative complications and better prosthesis positioning. Furthermore, cost advantages of computer-navigated MIS over conventional THA technique are expected. METHODS/DESIGN: A cluster randomized controlled trial will be executed. Patients between the ages of 18 and 75 admitted for primary cementless unilateral THA will be included. Patients will be stratified using the Charnley classification. They will be randomly allocated to have computer-navigated MIS or conventional THA technique. Measurements take place preoperatively, perioperatively, and 6 weeks and 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Degree of limping (gait analysis), self-reported functional status and health-related quality of life (questionnaires) will be assessed preoperatively as well as postoperatively. Perioperative complications will be registered. Radiographic evaluation of prosthesis positioning will take place 6 weeks postoperatively. An evaluation of costs within and outside the healthcare sector will focus on differences in costs between computer-navigated MIS and conventional THA technique. DISCUSSION: Based on studies performed so far, few objective data quantifying the risks and benefits of computer-navigated MIS are available. Therefore, this study has been designed to compare (cost) effectiveness of computer-navigated MIS with a conventional technique for THA. The results of this trial will be presented as soon as they become available. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1781447 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-17814472007-01-25 Effectiveness of computer-navigated minimally invasive total hip surgery compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty: design of a randomized controlled trial Reininga, Inge HF Wagenmakers, Robert van den Akker-Scheek, Inge Stant, A Dennis Groothoff, Johan W Bulstra, Sjoerd K Zijlstra, Wiebren Stevens, Martin BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Moderate to severe osteoarthrosis is the most common indication for Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). Minimally Invasive Total Hip Surgery (MIS) and computer-navigated surgery were introduced several years ago. However, the literature lacks well-designed studies that provide evidence of superiority of computer-navigated MIS over a conventional THA technique. Hence, the purpose of this study is to compare (cost)effectiveness of computer-navigated MIS with a conventional technique for THA. It is our hypothesis that computer-navigated MIS will lead to a quicker recovery during the early postoperative period (3 months), and to an outcome at least as good 6 months postoperatively. We also hypothesize that computer-navigated MIS leads to fewer perioperative complications and better prosthesis positioning. Furthermore, cost advantages of computer-navigated MIS over conventional THA technique are expected. METHODS/DESIGN: A cluster randomized controlled trial will be executed. Patients between the ages of 18 and 75 admitted for primary cementless unilateral THA will be included. Patients will be stratified using the Charnley classification. They will be randomly allocated to have computer-navigated MIS or conventional THA technique. Measurements take place preoperatively, perioperatively, and 6 weeks and 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Degree of limping (gait analysis), self-reported functional status and health-related quality of life (questionnaires) will be assessed preoperatively as well as postoperatively. Perioperative complications will be registered. Radiographic evaluation of prosthesis positioning will take place 6 weeks postoperatively. An evaluation of costs within and outside the healthcare sector will focus on differences in costs between computer-navigated MIS and conventional THA technique. DISCUSSION: Based on studies performed so far, few objective data quantifying the risks and benefits of computer-navigated MIS are available. Therefore, this study has been designed to compare (cost) effectiveness of computer-navigated MIS with a conventional technique for THA. The results of this trial will be presented as soon as they become available. BioMed Central 2007-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC1781447/ /pubmed/17214906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-4 Text en Copyright © 2007 Reininga et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Reininga, Inge HF Wagenmakers, Robert van den Akker-Scheek, Inge Stant, A Dennis Groothoff, Johan W Bulstra, Sjoerd K Zijlstra, Wiebren Stevens, Martin Effectiveness of computer-navigated minimally invasive total hip surgery compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty: design of a randomized controlled trial |
title | Effectiveness of computer-navigated minimally invasive total hip surgery compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty: design of a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Effectiveness of computer-navigated minimally invasive total hip surgery compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty: design of a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of computer-navigated minimally invasive total hip surgery compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty: design of a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of computer-navigated minimally invasive total hip surgery compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty: design of a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Effectiveness of computer-navigated minimally invasive total hip surgery compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty: design of a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | effectiveness of computer-navigated minimally invasive total hip surgery compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty: design of a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1781447/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17214906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reiningaingehf effectivenessofcomputernavigatedminimallyinvasivetotalhipsurgerycomparedtoconventionaltotalhiparthroplastydesignofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wagenmakersrobert effectivenessofcomputernavigatedminimallyinvasivetotalhipsurgerycomparedtoconventionaltotalhiparthroplastydesignofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vandenakkerscheekinge effectivenessofcomputernavigatedminimallyinvasivetotalhipsurgerycomparedtoconventionaltotalhiparthroplastydesignofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT stantadennis effectivenessofcomputernavigatedminimallyinvasivetotalhipsurgerycomparedtoconventionaltotalhiparthroplastydesignofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT groothoffjohanw effectivenessofcomputernavigatedminimallyinvasivetotalhipsurgerycomparedtoconventionaltotalhiparthroplastydesignofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bulstrasjoerdk effectivenessofcomputernavigatedminimallyinvasivetotalhipsurgerycomparedtoconventionaltotalhiparthroplastydesignofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zijlstrawiebren effectivenessofcomputernavigatedminimallyinvasivetotalhipsurgerycomparedtoconventionaltotalhiparthroplastydesignofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT stevensmartin effectivenessofcomputernavigatedminimallyinvasivetotalhipsurgerycomparedtoconventionaltotalhiparthroplastydesignofarandomizedcontrolledtrial |