Cargando…
Striking variations in consultation rates with general practice reveal family influence
BACKGROUND: The reasons why patients decide to consult a general practitioner vary enormously. While there may be individual reasons for this variation, the family context has a significant and unique influence upon the frequency of individuals' visits. The objective of this study was to explor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1784094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17233891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-8-4 |
_version_ | 1782132035710615552 |
---|---|
author | Cardol, Mieke van Dijk, Liset van den Bosch, Wil JHM Spreeuwenberg, Peter de Bakker, Dinny H Groenewegen, Peter P |
author_facet | Cardol, Mieke van Dijk, Liset van den Bosch, Wil JHM Spreeuwenberg, Peter de Bakker, Dinny H Groenewegen, Peter P |
author_sort | Cardol, Mieke |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The reasons why patients decide to consult a general practitioner vary enormously. While there may be individual reasons for this variation, the family context has a significant and unique influence upon the frequency of individuals' visits. The objective of this study was to explore which family factors can explain the differences between strikingly high, and correspondingly low, family consultation rates in families with children aged up to 21. METHODS: Data were used from the second Dutch national survey of general practice. This survey extracted from the medical records of 96 practices in the Netherlands, information on all consultations with patients during 2001. We defined, through multilevel analysis, two groups of families. These had respectively, predominantly high, and low, contact frequencies due to a significant family influence upon the frequency of the individual's first contacts. Binomial logistic regression analyses were used to analyse which of the family factors, related to shared circumstances and socialisation conditions, can explain the differences in consultation rates between the two groups of families. RESULTS: In almost 3% of all families, individual consultation rates decrease significantly due to family influence. In 11% of the families, individual consultation rates significantly increase due to family influence. While taking into account the health status of family members, family factors can explain family consultation rates. These factors include circumstances such as their economic status and number of children, as well as socialisation conditions such as specific health knowledge and family beliefs. The chance of significant low frequencies of contact due to family influences increases significantly with factors such as, paid employment of parents in the health care sector, low expectations of general practitioners' care for minor ailments and a western cultural background. CONCLUSION: Family circumstances can easily be identified and will add to the understanding of the health complaints of the individual patient in the consulting room. Family circumstances related to health risks often cannot be changed but they can illuminate the reasons for a visit, and mould strategies for prevention, treatment or recovery. Health beliefs, on the other hand, may be influenced by providing specific knowledge. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1784094 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-17840942007-01-31 Striking variations in consultation rates with general practice reveal family influence Cardol, Mieke van Dijk, Liset van den Bosch, Wil JHM Spreeuwenberg, Peter de Bakker, Dinny H Groenewegen, Peter P BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: The reasons why patients decide to consult a general practitioner vary enormously. While there may be individual reasons for this variation, the family context has a significant and unique influence upon the frequency of individuals' visits. The objective of this study was to explore which family factors can explain the differences between strikingly high, and correspondingly low, family consultation rates in families with children aged up to 21. METHODS: Data were used from the second Dutch national survey of general practice. This survey extracted from the medical records of 96 practices in the Netherlands, information on all consultations with patients during 2001. We defined, through multilevel analysis, two groups of families. These had respectively, predominantly high, and low, contact frequencies due to a significant family influence upon the frequency of the individual's first contacts. Binomial logistic regression analyses were used to analyse which of the family factors, related to shared circumstances and socialisation conditions, can explain the differences in consultation rates between the two groups of families. RESULTS: In almost 3% of all families, individual consultation rates decrease significantly due to family influence. In 11% of the families, individual consultation rates significantly increase due to family influence. While taking into account the health status of family members, family factors can explain family consultation rates. These factors include circumstances such as their economic status and number of children, as well as socialisation conditions such as specific health knowledge and family beliefs. The chance of significant low frequencies of contact due to family influences increases significantly with factors such as, paid employment of parents in the health care sector, low expectations of general practitioners' care for minor ailments and a western cultural background. CONCLUSION: Family circumstances can easily be identified and will add to the understanding of the health complaints of the individual patient in the consulting room. Family circumstances related to health risks often cannot be changed but they can illuminate the reasons for a visit, and mould strategies for prevention, treatment or recovery. Health beliefs, on the other hand, may be influenced by providing specific knowledge. BioMed Central 2007-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC1784094/ /pubmed/17233891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-8-4 Text en Copyright © 2007 Cardol et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cardol, Mieke van Dijk, Liset van den Bosch, Wil JHM Spreeuwenberg, Peter de Bakker, Dinny H Groenewegen, Peter P Striking variations in consultation rates with general practice reveal family influence |
title | Striking variations in consultation rates with general practice reveal family influence |
title_full | Striking variations in consultation rates with general practice reveal family influence |
title_fullStr | Striking variations in consultation rates with general practice reveal family influence |
title_full_unstemmed | Striking variations in consultation rates with general practice reveal family influence |
title_short | Striking variations in consultation rates with general practice reveal family influence |
title_sort | striking variations in consultation rates with general practice reveal family influence |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1784094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17233891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-8-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cardolmieke strikingvariationsinconsultationrateswithgeneralpracticerevealfamilyinfluence AT vandijkliset strikingvariationsinconsultationrateswithgeneralpracticerevealfamilyinfluence AT vandenboschwiljhm strikingvariationsinconsultationrateswithgeneralpracticerevealfamilyinfluence AT spreeuwenbergpeter strikingvariationsinconsultationrateswithgeneralpracticerevealfamilyinfluence AT debakkerdinnyh strikingvariationsinconsultationrateswithgeneralpracticerevealfamilyinfluence AT groenewegenpeterp strikingvariationsinconsultationrateswithgeneralpracticerevealfamilyinfluence |