Cargando…
Chiropractic and CAM Utilization: A Descriptive Review
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a descriptive review of the scientific literature examining use rates of modalities and procedures used by CAM clinicians to manage chronic LBP and other conditions DATA SOURCES: A literature of PubMed and MANTIS was performed using the key terms Chiropractic; Low Back Pain; Ut...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1784103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17241465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-15-2 |
_version_ | 1782132038181060608 |
---|---|
author | Lawrence, Dana J Meeker, William C |
author_facet | Lawrence, Dana J Meeker, William C |
author_sort | Lawrence, Dana J |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To conduct a descriptive review of the scientific literature examining use rates of modalities and procedures used by CAM clinicians to manage chronic LBP and other conditions DATA SOURCES: A literature of PubMed and MANTIS was performed using the key terms Chiropractic; Low Back Pain; Utilization Rate; Use Rate; Complementary and Alternative Medicine; and Health Services in various combinations. DATA SELECTION: A total of 137 papers were selected, based upon including information about chiropractic utilization, CAM utilization and low back pain and other conditions. DATA SYNTHESIS: Information was extracted from each paper addressing use of chiropractic and CAM, and is summarized in tabular form. RESULTS: Thematic analysis of the paper topics indicated that there were 5 functional areas covered by the literature: back pain papers, general chiropractic papers, insurance-related papers, general CAM-related papers; and worker's compensation papers. CONCLUSION: Studies looking at chiropractic utilization demonstrate that the rates vary, but generally fall into a range from around 6% to 12% of the population, most of whom seek chiropractic care for low back pain and not for organic disease or visceral dysfunction. CAM is itself used by people suffering from a variety of conditions, though it is often used not as a primary intervention, but rather as an additional form of care. CAM and chiropractic often offer lower costs for comparable results compared to conventional medicine. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1784103 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-17841032007-01-31 Chiropractic and CAM Utilization: A Descriptive Review Lawrence, Dana J Meeker, William C Chiropr Osteopat Review OBJECTIVE: To conduct a descriptive review of the scientific literature examining use rates of modalities and procedures used by CAM clinicians to manage chronic LBP and other conditions DATA SOURCES: A literature of PubMed and MANTIS was performed using the key terms Chiropractic; Low Back Pain; Utilization Rate; Use Rate; Complementary and Alternative Medicine; and Health Services in various combinations. DATA SELECTION: A total of 137 papers were selected, based upon including information about chiropractic utilization, CAM utilization and low back pain and other conditions. DATA SYNTHESIS: Information was extracted from each paper addressing use of chiropractic and CAM, and is summarized in tabular form. RESULTS: Thematic analysis of the paper topics indicated that there were 5 functional areas covered by the literature: back pain papers, general chiropractic papers, insurance-related papers, general CAM-related papers; and worker's compensation papers. CONCLUSION: Studies looking at chiropractic utilization demonstrate that the rates vary, but generally fall into a range from around 6% to 12% of the population, most of whom seek chiropractic care for low back pain and not for organic disease or visceral dysfunction. CAM is itself used by people suffering from a variety of conditions, though it is often used not as a primary intervention, but rather as an additional form of care. CAM and chiropractic often offer lower costs for comparable results compared to conventional medicine. BioMed Central 2007-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC1784103/ /pubmed/17241465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-15-2 Text en Copyright © 2007 Lawrence and Meeker; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Lawrence, Dana J Meeker, William C Chiropractic and CAM Utilization: A Descriptive Review |
title | Chiropractic and CAM Utilization: A Descriptive Review |
title_full | Chiropractic and CAM Utilization: A Descriptive Review |
title_fullStr | Chiropractic and CAM Utilization: A Descriptive Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Chiropractic and CAM Utilization: A Descriptive Review |
title_short | Chiropractic and CAM Utilization: A Descriptive Review |
title_sort | chiropractic and cam utilization: a descriptive review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1784103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17241465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-15-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lawrencedanaj chiropracticandcamutilizationadescriptivereview AT meekerwilliamc chiropracticandcamutilizationadescriptivereview |