Cargando…

Evaluation of relative yeast cell surface hydrophobicity measured by flow cytometry.

OBJECTIVE: To develop an efficient method for evaluating cell surface hydrophobicity and to apply the method to demonstrate the effects of fungal growth conditions on cell surface properties. METHODS: Yeast isolates were suspended in phosphate-buffered saline and mixed with deep blue-dyed polystyren...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Colling, Lisa, Carter, Richard N, Essmann, Michael, Larsen, Bryan
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1784552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16040327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10647440400028169
_version_ 1782132043445960704
author Colling, Lisa
Carter, Richard N
Essmann, Michael
Larsen, Bryan
author_facet Colling, Lisa
Carter, Richard N
Essmann, Michael
Larsen, Bryan
author_sort Colling, Lisa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To develop an efficient method for evaluating cell surface hydrophobicity and to apply the method to demonstrate the effects of fungal growth conditions on cell surface properties. METHODS: Yeast isolates were suspended in phosphate-buffered saline and mixed with deep blue-dyed polystyrene microspheres. Flow cytometry was used to detect the degree of microsphere binding to yeast cells. Different strains of yeast were compared for intrinsic microsphere binding activity and changes in growth conditions were invoked to modify the relative surface hydrophobicity. RESULTS: Commercially available blue-dyed polystyrene microspheres showed strong fluorescence in the FL3 channel, whereas yeast cells did not show appreciable FL3 fluorescence. Microspheres and yeast were generally distinguishable on the basis of size revealed by forward light scatter. This method showed a wide variation in intrinsic cell surface hydrophobicity among Candida albicans strains. Likewise, variation in hydrophobicity of non-albicans yeast species was observed. Growth on solid media, incubation at 25 degrees C, or 250 mg/dl glucose concentration increased hydrophobicity compared with growth in liquid media, incubation at 37 degrees C, or 50 mg/dl glucose, respectively. Growth in 1 x 10(-9) M estradiol had no appreciable effect on hydrophobicity. CONCLUSIONS: Stained latex microspheres fluoresced in the FL3 channel of the flow cytometer and bound to yeast cells to an extent related to the surface hydrophobicity of the yeast. Binding detected by flow cytometry showed that clinical yeast isolates varied in intrinsic binding capacity and this binding ability was altered by different growth conditions. The implications for virulence regulation among yeast isolates are discussed.
format Text
id pubmed-1784552
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-17845522007-02-05 Evaluation of relative yeast cell surface hydrophobicity measured by flow cytometry. Colling, Lisa Carter, Richard N Essmann, Michael Larsen, Bryan Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol Research Article OBJECTIVE: To develop an efficient method for evaluating cell surface hydrophobicity and to apply the method to demonstrate the effects of fungal growth conditions on cell surface properties. METHODS: Yeast isolates were suspended in phosphate-buffered saline and mixed with deep blue-dyed polystyrene microspheres. Flow cytometry was used to detect the degree of microsphere binding to yeast cells. Different strains of yeast were compared for intrinsic microsphere binding activity and changes in growth conditions were invoked to modify the relative surface hydrophobicity. RESULTS: Commercially available blue-dyed polystyrene microspheres showed strong fluorescence in the FL3 channel, whereas yeast cells did not show appreciable FL3 fluorescence. Microspheres and yeast were generally distinguishable on the basis of size revealed by forward light scatter. This method showed a wide variation in intrinsic cell surface hydrophobicity among Candida albicans strains. Likewise, variation in hydrophobicity of non-albicans yeast species was observed. Growth on solid media, incubation at 25 degrees C, or 250 mg/dl glucose concentration increased hydrophobicity compared with growth in liquid media, incubation at 37 degrees C, or 50 mg/dl glucose, respectively. Growth in 1 x 10(-9) M estradiol had no appreciable effect on hydrophobicity. CONCLUSIONS: Stained latex microspheres fluoresced in the FL3 channel of the flow cytometer and bound to yeast cells to an extent related to the surface hydrophobicity of the yeast. Binding detected by flow cytometry showed that clinical yeast isolates varied in intrinsic binding capacity and this binding ability was altered by different growth conditions. The implications for virulence regulation among yeast isolates are discussed. 2005-03 /pmc/articles/PMC1784552/ /pubmed/16040327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10647440400028169 Text en
spellingShingle Research Article
Colling, Lisa
Carter, Richard N
Essmann, Michael
Larsen, Bryan
Evaluation of relative yeast cell surface hydrophobicity measured by flow cytometry.
title Evaluation of relative yeast cell surface hydrophobicity measured by flow cytometry.
title_full Evaluation of relative yeast cell surface hydrophobicity measured by flow cytometry.
title_fullStr Evaluation of relative yeast cell surface hydrophobicity measured by flow cytometry.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of relative yeast cell surface hydrophobicity measured by flow cytometry.
title_short Evaluation of relative yeast cell surface hydrophobicity measured by flow cytometry.
title_sort evaluation of relative yeast cell surface hydrophobicity measured by flow cytometry.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1784552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16040327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10647440400028169
work_keys_str_mv AT collinglisa evaluationofrelativeyeastcellsurfacehydrophobicitymeasuredbyflowcytometry
AT carterrichardn evaluationofrelativeyeastcellsurfacehydrophobicitymeasuredbyflowcytometry
AT essmannmichael evaluationofrelativeyeastcellsurfacehydrophobicitymeasuredbyflowcytometry
AT larsenbryan evaluationofrelativeyeastcellsurfacehydrophobicitymeasuredbyflowcytometry