Cargando…

Differences in Innate Immunologic Response to Group B Streptococcus Between Colonized and Noncolonized Women

Objective: To evaluate the functional capacity of granulocytes and monocytes from pregnant and nonpregnant women in relation to group B streptococcus (GBS) colonization status. Methods: Engulfment of fluorescent GBS by peripheral blood phagocytes from GBS-colonized and noncolonized women was measure...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Jennifer M., Respess, Rachel H., Chaffin, David G., Larsen, Bryan, Jackman, Susan H.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1784651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11516060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1064744901000230
_version_ 1782132071244759040
author Smith, Jennifer M.
Respess, Rachel H.
Chaffin, David G.
Larsen, Bryan
Jackman, Susan H.
author_facet Smith, Jennifer M.
Respess, Rachel H.
Chaffin, David G.
Larsen, Bryan
Jackman, Susan H.
author_sort Smith, Jennifer M.
collection PubMed
description Objective: To evaluate the functional capacity of granulocytes and monocytes from pregnant and nonpregnant women in relation to group B streptococcus (GBS) colonization status. Methods: Engulfment of fluorescent GBS by peripheral blood phagocytes from GBS-colonized and noncolonized women was measured by flow cytometry. Intracellular superoxiode generated in response to GBS challenge to monocytes and granulocytes enriched from peripheral blood of these women was also measured by flow cytometry, and extracellular superoxide was determined by colorimetric assay. Results: Monocytes and granulocytes from pregnant, GBS-colonized women engulfed significantly greater numbers of GBS than phagocytes from pregnant, noncolonized women. No difference in intracellular superoxide production was detected between any of the groups of women; however, monocytes from pregnant, colonized women released significantly more superoxide into the extracellular milieu than did granulocytes from the same women. No differences in extracellular release of superoxide were observed among noncolonized women whether they were pregnant or not. Conclusions: Monocytes from pregnant, colonized women engulf more GBS and release more of the superoxide into the extracellular environment, where it is unlikely to be an effective defense mechanism against intracellular bacteria. This suggests that components of the innate immune system that should serve in a protective role may function suboptimally, thereby contributing to the colonization process by GBS.
format Text
id pubmed-1784651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-17846512007-02-05 Differences in Innate Immunologic Response to Group B Streptococcus Between Colonized and Noncolonized Women Smith, Jennifer M. Respess, Rachel H. Chaffin, David G. Larsen, Bryan Jackman, Susan H. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol Research Article Objective: To evaluate the functional capacity of granulocytes and monocytes from pregnant and nonpregnant women in relation to group B streptococcus (GBS) colonization status. Methods: Engulfment of fluorescent GBS by peripheral blood phagocytes from GBS-colonized and noncolonized women was measured by flow cytometry. Intracellular superoxiode generated in response to GBS challenge to monocytes and granulocytes enriched from peripheral blood of these women was also measured by flow cytometry, and extracellular superoxide was determined by colorimetric assay. Results: Monocytes and granulocytes from pregnant, GBS-colonized women engulfed significantly greater numbers of GBS than phagocytes from pregnant, noncolonized women. No difference in intracellular superoxide production was detected between any of the groups of women; however, monocytes from pregnant, colonized women released significantly more superoxide into the extracellular milieu than did granulocytes from the same women. No differences in extracellular release of superoxide were observed among noncolonized women whether they were pregnant or not. Conclusions: Monocytes from pregnant, colonized women engulf more GBS and release more of the superoxide into the extracellular environment, where it is unlikely to be an effective defense mechanism against intracellular bacteria. This suggests that components of the innate immune system that should serve in a protective role may function suboptimally, thereby contributing to the colonization process by GBS. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2001 /pmc/articles/PMC1784651/ /pubmed/11516060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1064744901000230 Text en Copyright © 2001 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Smith, Jennifer M.
Respess, Rachel H.
Chaffin, David G.
Larsen, Bryan
Jackman, Susan H.
Differences in Innate Immunologic Response to Group B Streptococcus Between Colonized and Noncolonized Women
title Differences in Innate Immunologic Response to Group B Streptococcus Between Colonized and Noncolonized Women
title_full Differences in Innate Immunologic Response to Group B Streptococcus Between Colonized and Noncolonized Women
title_fullStr Differences in Innate Immunologic Response to Group B Streptococcus Between Colonized and Noncolonized Women
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Innate Immunologic Response to Group B Streptococcus Between Colonized and Noncolonized Women
title_short Differences in Innate Immunologic Response to Group B Streptococcus Between Colonized and Noncolonized Women
title_sort differences in innate immunologic response to group b streptococcus between colonized and noncolonized women
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1784651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11516060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1064744901000230
work_keys_str_mv AT smithjenniferm differencesininnateimmunologicresponsetogroupbstreptococcusbetweencolonizedandnoncolonizedwomen
AT respessrachelh differencesininnateimmunologicresponsetogroupbstreptococcusbetweencolonizedandnoncolonizedwomen
AT chaffindavidg differencesininnateimmunologicresponsetogroupbstreptococcusbetweencolonizedandnoncolonizedwomen
AT larsenbryan differencesininnateimmunologicresponsetogroupbstreptococcusbetweencolonizedandnoncolonizedwomen
AT jackmansusanh differencesininnateimmunologicresponsetogroupbstreptococcusbetweencolonizedandnoncolonizedwomen