Cargando…

Comparison of Abbott LCx Chlamydia trachomatis assay with Gen-Probe PACE2 and culture.

In this study the LCx assay (a nucleic acid amplification assay) for Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical samples was compared with the Gen-Probe PACE2 assay (a nucleic acid probe assay) for endocervical samples, and with endocervical culture. In addition, the efficacy of the LCx assay was determin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Young, D C, Craft, S, Day, M C, Davis, B, Hartwell, E, Tong, S
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1784672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10805367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-0997(2000)8:2<112::AID-IDOG9>3.0.CO;2-E
_version_ 1782132077086375936
author Young, D C
Craft, S
Day, M C
Davis, B
Hartwell, E
Tong, S
author_facet Young, D C
Craft, S
Day, M C
Davis, B
Hartwell, E
Tong, S
author_sort Young, D C
collection PubMed
description In this study the LCx assay (a nucleic acid amplification assay) for Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical samples was compared with the Gen-Probe PACE2 assay (a nucleic acid probe assay) for endocervical samples, and with endocervical culture. In addition, the efficacy of the LCx assay was determined for midstream clean-catch urine samples because it is often necessary to obtain such a sample for routine urine culture and it is simpler to collect only a single sample without also collecting a first-void urine for LCx. Endocervical specimens from 205 patients were tested for C. trachomatis via LCx and PACE2. Of these patients, 203 were tested by culture. Midstream clean-catch urine samples from 75 of these patients were tested by LCx. The sensitivities and specificities for these assays, after discrepant analysis, were 100 and 98.9% for LCx of endocervical samples, 52.4 and 100% for PACE2; and 71.4 and 100% for culture. The sensitivity/specificity of LCx for midstream clean-catch urines was 66.7/98.5%. The apparent prevalence of C. trachomatis in our population was 10.2%. These data indicate that among the methods tested, LCx of endocervical samples had the highest sensitivity for C. trachomatis in this population. The sensitivity of the urine LCx assay using midstream clean-catch collected urines was considerably less than that reported in other studies that used first-void urines but was higher than that of PACE2.
format Text
id pubmed-1784672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2000
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-17846722007-02-05 Comparison of Abbott LCx Chlamydia trachomatis assay with Gen-Probe PACE2 and culture. Young, D C Craft, S Day, M C Davis, B Hartwell, E Tong, S Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol Research Article In this study the LCx assay (a nucleic acid amplification assay) for Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical samples was compared with the Gen-Probe PACE2 assay (a nucleic acid probe assay) for endocervical samples, and with endocervical culture. In addition, the efficacy of the LCx assay was determined for midstream clean-catch urine samples because it is often necessary to obtain such a sample for routine urine culture and it is simpler to collect only a single sample without also collecting a first-void urine for LCx. Endocervical specimens from 205 patients were tested for C. trachomatis via LCx and PACE2. Of these patients, 203 were tested by culture. Midstream clean-catch urine samples from 75 of these patients were tested by LCx. The sensitivities and specificities for these assays, after discrepant analysis, were 100 and 98.9% for LCx of endocervical samples, 52.4 and 100% for PACE2; and 71.4 and 100% for culture. The sensitivity/specificity of LCx for midstream clean-catch urines was 66.7/98.5%. The apparent prevalence of C. trachomatis in our population was 10.2%. These data indicate that among the methods tested, LCx of endocervical samples had the highest sensitivity for C. trachomatis in this population. The sensitivity of the urine LCx assay using midstream clean-catch collected urines was considerably less than that reported in other studies that used first-void urines but was higher than that of PACE2. 2000 /pmc/articles/PMC1784672/ /pubmed/10805367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-0997(2000)8:2<112::AID-IDOG9>3.0.CO;2-E Text en
spellingShingle Research Article
Young, D C
Craft, S
Day, M C
Davis, B
Hartwell, E
Tong, S
Comparison of Abbott LCx Chlamydia trachomatis assay with Gen-Probe PACE2 and culture.
title Comparison of Abbott LCx Chlamydia trachomatis assay with Gen-Probe PACE2 and culture.
title_full Comparison of Abbott LCx Chlamydia trachomatis assay with Gen-Probe PACE2 and culture.
title_fullStr Comparison of Abbott LCx Chlamydia trachomatis assay with Gen-Probe PACE2 and culture.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Abbott LCx Chlamydia trachomatis assay with Gen-Probe PACE2 and culture.
title_short Comparison of Abbott LCx Chlamydia trachomatis assay with Gen-Probe PACE2 and culture.
title_sort comparison of abbott lcx chlamydia trachomatis assay with gen-probe pace2 and culture.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1784672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10805367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-0997(2000)8:2<112::AID-IDOG9>3.0.CO;2-E
work_keys_str_mv AT youngdc comparisonofabbottlcxchlamydiatrachomatisassaywithgenprobepace2andculture
AT crafts comparisonofabbottlcxchlamydiatrachomatisassaywithgenprobepace2andculture
AT daymc comparisonofabbottlcxchlamydiatrachomatisassaywithgenprobepace2andculture
AT davisb comparisonofabbottlcxchlamydiatrachomatisassaywithgenprobepace2andculture
AT hartwelle comparisonofabbottlcxchlamydiatrachomatisassaywithgenprobepace2andculture
AT tongs comparisonofabbottlcxchlamydiatrachomatisassaywithgenprobepace2andculture