Cargando…

Cutaneous anergy in pregnant and nonpregnant women with human immunodeficiency virus.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of cutaneous anergy in pregnant and nonpregnant women who are seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The medical records of 159 women seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus were reviewed. Demographic characteristics and tub...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eriksen, N L, Helfgott, A W
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 1998
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1784769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9678142
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-0997(1998)6:1<13::AID-IDOG4>3.0.CO;2-8
_version_ 1782132099238592512
author Eriksen, N L
Helfgott, A W
author_facet Eriksen, N L
Helfgott, A W
author_sort Eriksen, N L
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of cutaneous anergy in pregnant and nonpregnant women who are seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The medical records of 159 women seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus were reviewed. Demographic characteristics and tuberculin skin test results were abstracted from the chart. Tuberculin skin testing was performed by the Mantoux method (5 tuberculin units of purified protein derivative injected intradermally). Anergy testing was performed using any two of the three following antigens; tetanus toxoid, mumps, or Candida skin test antigen. A positive tuberculin test was defined as induration of 5 mm or more, and a positive test for the other antigens was defined as any amount of induration over the skin test area. Anergy was defined as any amount of induration to the other antigens. A CD4+T lymphocyte count was obtained at the time of skin testing. Continuous variables were analyzed using the Mann Whitney-U test. Categorical data were analyzed with the chi-square or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. A two-tailed P value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: There were 102 nonpregnant and 57 pregnant women who returned to have their skin test results read. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of positive, negative or anergic skin test results between groups. The CD4+T lymphocyte count (mean +/- standard deviation) in patients with anergic results was similar between pregnant (375 +/- 256/mm3) and nonpregnant (358 +/- 305/mm3) women (P = 0.64). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of cutaneous anergy is similar among pregnant and nonpregnant women seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus.
format Text
id pubmed-1784769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1998
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-17847692007-02-05 Cutaneous anergy in pregnant and nonpregnant women with human immunodeficiency virus. Eriksen, N L Helfgott, A W Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol Research Article OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of cutaneous anergy in pregnant and nonpregnant women who are seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The medical records of 159 women seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus were reviewed. Demographic characteristics and tuberculin skin test results were abstracted from the chart. Tuberculin skin testing was performed by the Mantoux method (5 tuberculin units of purified protein derivative injected intradermally). Anergy testing was performed using any two of the three following antigens; tetanus toxoid, mumps, or Candida skin test antigen. A positive tuberculin test was defined as induration of 5 mm or more, and a positive test for the other antigens was defined as any amount of induration over the skin test area. Anergy was defined as any amount of induration to the other antigens. A CD4+T lymphocyte count was obtained at the time of skin testing. Continuous variables were analyzed using the Mann Whitney-U test. Categorical data were analyzed with the chi-square or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. A two-tailed P value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: There were 102 nonpregnant and 57 pregnant women who returned to have their skin test results read. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of positive, negative or anergic skin test results between groups. The CD4+T lymphocyte count (mean +/- standard deviation) in patients with anergic results was similar between pregnant (375 +/- 256/mm3) and nonpregnant (358 +/- 305/mm3) women (P = 0.64). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of cutaneous anergy is similar among pregnant and nonpregnant women seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus. 1998 /pmc/articles/PMC1784769/ /pubmed/9678142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-0997(1998)6:1<13::AID-IDOG4>3.0.CO;2-8 Text en
spellingShingle Research Article
Eriksen, N L
Helfgott, A W
Cutaneous anergy in pregnant and nonpregnant women with human immunodeficiency virus.
title Cutaneous anergy in pregnant and nonpregnant women with human immunodeficiency virus.
title_full Cutaneous anergy in pregnant and nonpregnant women with human immunodeficiency virus.
title_fullStr Cutaneous anergy in pregnant and nonpregnant women with human immunodeficiency virus.
title_full_unstemmed Cutaneous anergy in pregnant and nonpregnant women with human immunodeficiency virus.
title_short Cutaneous anergy in pregnant and nonpregnant women with human immunodeficiency virus.
title_sort cutaneous anergy in pregnant and nonpregnant women with human immunodeficiency virus.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1784769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9678142
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-0997(1998)6:1<13::AID-IDOG4>3.0.CO;2-8
work_keys_str_mv AT eriksennl cutaneousanergyinpregnantandnonpregnantwomenwithhumanimmunodeficiencyvirus
AT helfgottaw cutaneousanergyinpregnantandnonpregnantwomenwithhumanimmunodeficiencyvirus