Cargando…

Biofeedback for robotic gait rehabilitation

BACKGROUND: Development and increasing acceptance of rehabilitation robots as well as advances in technology allow new forms of therapy for patients with neurological disorders. Robot-assisted gait therapy can increase the training duration and the intensity for the patients while reducing the physi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lünenburger, Lars, Colombo, Gery, Riener, Robert
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1790897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17244363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-4-1
_version_ 1782132134711918592
author Lünenburger, Lars
Colombo, Gery
Riener, Robert
author_facet Lünenburger, Lars
Colombo, Gery
Riener, Robert
author_sort Lünenburger, Lars
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Development and increasing acceptance of rehabilitation robots as well as advances in technology allow new forms of therapy for patients with neurological disorders. Robot-assisted gait therapy can increase the training duration and the intensity for the patients while reducing the physical strain for the therapist. Optimal training effects during gait therapy generally depend on appropriate feedback about performance. Compared to manual treadmill therapy, there is a loss of physical interaction between therapist and patient with robotic gait retraining. Thus, it is difficult for the therapist to assess the necessary feedback and instructions. The aim of this study was to define a biofeedback system for a gait training robot and test its usability in subjects without neurological disorders. METHODS: To provide an overview of biofeedback and motivation methods applied in gait rehabilitation, previous publications and results from our own research are reviewed. A biofeedback method is presented showing how a rehabilitation robot can assess the patients' performance and deliver augmented feedback. For validation, three subjects without neurological disorders walked in a rehabilitation robot for treadmill training. Several training parameters, such as body weight support and treadmill speed, were varied to assess the robustness of the biofeedback calculation to confounding factors. RESULTS: The biofeedback values correlated well with the different activity levels of the subjects. Changes in body weight support and treadmill velocity had a minor effect on the biofeedback values. The synchronization of the robot and the treadmill affected the biofeedback values describing the stance phase. CONCLUSION: Robot-aided assessment and feedback can extend and improve robot-aided training devices. The presented method estimates the patients' gait performance with the use of the robot's existing sensors, and displays the resulting biofeedback values to the patients and therapists. The therapists can adapt the therapy and give further instructions to the patients. The feedback might help the patients to adapt their movement patterns and to improve their motivation. While it is assumed that these novel methods also improve training efficacy, the proof will only be possible with future in-depth clinical studies.
format Text
id pubmed-1790897
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-17908972007-02-03 Biofeedback for robotic gait rehabilitation Lünenburger, Lars Colombo, Gery Riener, Robert J Neuroengineering Rehabil Review BACKGROUND: Development and increasing acceptance of rehabilitation robots as well as advances in technology allow new forms of therapy for patients with neurological disorders. Robot-assisted gait therapy can increase the training duration and the intensity for the patients while reducing the physical strain for the therapist. Optimal training effects during gait therapy generally depend on appropriate feedback about performance. Compared to manual treadmill therapy, there is a loss of physical interaction between therapist and patient with robotic gait retraining. Thus, it is difficult for the therapist to assess the necessary feedback and instructions. The aim of this study was to define a biofeedback system for a gait training robot and test its usability in subjects without neurological disorders. METHODS: To provide an overview of biofeedback and motivation methods applied in gait rehabilitation, previous publications and results from our own research are reviewed. A biofeedback method is presented showing how a rehabilitation robot can assess the patients' performance and deliver augmented feedback. For validation, three subjects without neurological disorders walked in a rehabilitation robot for treadmill training. Several training parameters, such as body weight support and treadmill speed, were varied to assess the robustness of the biofeedback calculation to confounding factors. RESULTS: The biofeedback values correlated well with the different activity levels of the subjects. Changes in body weight support and treadmill velocity had a minor effect on the biofeedback values. The synchronization of the robot and the treadmill affected the biofeedback values describing the stance phase. CONCLUSION: Robot-aided assessment and feedback can extend and improve robot-aided training devices. The presented method estimates the patients' gait performance with the use of the robot's existing sensors, and displays the resulting biofeedback values to the patients and therapists. The therapists can adapt the therapy and give further instructions to the patients. The feedback might help the patients to adapt their movement patterns and to improve their motivation. While it is assumed that these novel methods also improve training efficacy, the proof will only be possible with future in-depth clinical studies. BioMed Central 2007-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC1790897/ /pubmed/17244363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-4-1 Text en Copyright © 2007 Lünenburger et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Lünenburger, Lars
Colombo, Gery
Riener, Robert
Biofeedback for robotic gait rehabilitation
title Biofeedback for robotic gait rehabilitation
title_full Biofeedback for robotic gait rehabilitation
title_fullStr Biofeedback for robotic gait rehabilitation
title_full_unstemmed Biofeedback for robotic gait rehabilitation
title_short Biofeedback for robotic gait rehabilitation
title_sort biofeedback for robotic gait rehabilitation
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1790897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17244363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-4-1
work_keys_str_mv AT lunenburgerlars biofeedbackforroboticgaitrehabilitation
AT colombogery biofeedbackforroboticgaitrehabilitation
AT rienerrobert biofeedbackforroboticgaitrehabilitation