Age-Specific Search Strategies for Medline

BACKGROUND: Many clinicians and researchers are interested in patients of a specific age (childhood, geriatrics, and so on). Searching for age-specific publications in large bibliographic databases such as Medline is problematic because of inconsistencies in indexing, overlapping age categories, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kastner, Monika, Wilczynski, Nancy L, Walker-Dilks, Cindy, McKibbon, Kathleen Ann, Haynes, Brian
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Gunther Eysenbach 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1794003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17213044
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8.4.e25
_version_ 1782132146066948096
author Kastner, Monika
Wilczynski, Nancy L
Walker-Dilks, Cindy
McKibbon, Kathleen Ann
Haynes, Brian
author_facet Kastner, Monika
Wilczynski, Nancy L
Walker-Dilks, Cindy
McKibbon, Kathleen Ann
Haynes, Brian
author_sort Kastner, Monika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many clinicians and researchers are interested in patients of a specific age (childhood, geriatrics, and so on). Searching for age-specific publications in large bibliographic databases such as Medline is problematic because of inconsistencies in indexing, overlapping age categories, and the spread of the relevant literature over many journals. To our knowledge, no empirically tested age-specific search strategies exist for Medline. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the retrieval characteristics of age-specific terms in Medline for identifying studies relevant for five clinical specialties: adult medicine, geriatric medicine, pediatric medicine, neonatal medicine, and obstetrics. METHODS: We compared age-specific search terms and phrases for the retrieval of citations in Medline with a manual hand search of the literature for 161 core health care journals. Six experienced research assistants who were trained and intensively calibrated read all issues of 161 journals for the publishing year 2000. In addition to classifying all articles for purpose and quality, study participants' ages were also recorded. Outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, precision, and accuracy of single and combination search terms. RESULTS: When maximizing sensitivity, the best sensitivity and specificity achieved with combination terms were 98% and 81.2%, respectively, for pediatric medicine, 96.4% and 55.9% for geriatric medicine, 95.3% and 83.6% for neonatal medicine, 94.9% and 64.5% for adult medicine, and 82% and 97.1% for obstetrics. When specificity was maximized, all disciplines had an expected decrease in sensitivity and an increase in precision. Highest values for optimizing best sensitivity and specificity were achieved in neonatal medicine, 92.5% and 92.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Selected single terms and combinations of MeSH terms and textwords can reliably retrieve age-specific studies cited in Medline.
format Text
id pubmed-1794003
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Gunther Eysenbach
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-17940032007-02-06 Age-Specific Search Strategies for Medline Kastner, Monika Wilczynski, Nancy L Walker-Dilks, Cindy McKibbon, Kathleen Ann Haynes, Brian J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Many clinicians and researchers are interested in patients of a specific age (childhood, geriatrics, and so on). Searching for age-specific publications in large bibliographic databases such as Medline is problematic because of inconsistencies in indexing, overlapping age categories, and the spread of the relevant literature over many journals. To our knowledge, no empirically tested age-specific search strategies exist for Medline. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the retrieval characteristics of age-specific terms in Medline for identifying studies relevant for five clinical specialties: adult medicine, geriatric medicine, pediatric medicine, neonatal medicine, and obstetrics. METHODS: We compared age-specific search terms and phrases for the retrieval of citations in Medline with a manual hand search of the literature for 161 core health care journals. Six experienced research assistants who were trained and intensively calibrated read all issues of 161 journals for the publishing year 2000. In addition to classifying all articles for purpose and quality, study participants' ages were also recorded. Outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, precision, and accuracy of single and combination search terms. RESULTS: When maximizing sensitivity, the best sensitivity and specificity achieved with combination terms were 98% and 81.2%, respectively, for pediatric medicine, 96.4% and 55.9% for geriatric medicine, 95.3% and 83.6% for neonatal medicine, 94.9% and 64.5% for adult medicine, and 82% and 97.1% for obstetrics. When specificity was maximized, all disciplines had an expected decrease in sensitivity and an increase in precision. Highest values for optimizing best sensitivity and specificity were achieved in neonatal medicine, 92.5% and 92.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Selected single terms and combinations of MeSH terms and textwords can reliably retrieve age-specific studies cited in Medline. Gunther Eysenbach 2006-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC1794003/ /pubmed/17213044 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8.4.e25 Text en © Monika Kastner, Nancy L Wilczynski, Cindy Walker-Dilks, Kathleen Ann McKibbon. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 25.10.2006. Except where otherwise noted, articles published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, including full bibliographic details and the URL (see "please cite as" above), and this statement is included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Kastner, Monika
Wilczynski, Nancy L
Walker-Dilks, Cindy
McKibbon, Kathleen Ann
Haynes, Brian
Age-Specific Search Strategies for Medline
title Age-Specific Search Strategies for Medline
title_full Age-Specific Search Strategies for Medline
title_fullStr Age-Specific Search Strategies for Medline
title_full_unstemmed Age-Specific Search Strategies for Medline
title_short Age-Specific Search Strategies for Medline
title_sort age-specific search strategies for medline
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1794003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17213044
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8.4.e25
work_keys_str_mv AT kastnermonika agespecificsearchstrategiesformedline
AT wilczynskinancyl agespecificsearchstrategiesformedline
AT walkerdilkscindy agespecificsearchstrategiesformedline
AT mckibbonkathleenann agespecificsearchstrategiesformedline
AT haynesbrian agespecificsearchstrategiesformedline