Cargando…
Is mammalian chromosomal evolution driven by regions of genome fragility?
BACKGROUND: A fundamental question in comparative genomics concerns the identification of mechanisms that underpin chromosomal change. In an attempt to shed light on the dynamics of mammalian genome evolution, we analyzed the distribution of syntenic blocks, evolutionary breakpoint regions, and evol...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1794428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17156441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2006-7-12-r115 |
_version_ | 1782132173275398144 |
---|---|
author | Ruiz-Herrera, Aurora Castresana, Jose Robinson, Terence J |
author_facet | Ruiz-Herrera, Aurora Castresana, Jose Robinson, Terence J |
author_sort | Ruiz-Herrera, Aurora |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A fundamental question in comparative genomics concerns the identification of mechanisms that underpin chromosomal change. In an attempt to shed light on the dynamics of mammalian genome evolution, we analyzed the distribution of syntenic blocks, evolutionary breakpoint regions, and evolutionary breakpoints taken from public databases available for seven eutherian species (mouse, rat, cattle, dog, pig, cat, and horse) and the chicken, and examined these for correspondence with human fragile sites and tandem repeats. RESULTS: Our results confirm previous investigations that showed the presence of chromosomal regions in the human genome that have been repeatedly used as illustrated by a high breakpoint accumulation in certain chromosomes and chromosomal bands. We show, however, that there is a striking correspondence between fragile site location, the positions of evolutionary breakpoints, and the distribution of tandem repeats throughout the human genome, which similarly reflect a non-uniform pattern of occurrence. CONCLUSION: These observations provide further evidence that certain chromosomal regions in the human genome have been repeatedly used in the evolutionary process. As a consequence, the genome is a composite of fragile regions prone to reorganization that have been conserved in different lineages, and genomic tracts that do not exhibit the same levels of evolutionary plasticity. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1794428 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-17944282007-02-08 Is mammalian chromosomal evolution driven by regions of genome fragility? Ruiz-Herrera, Aurora Castresana, Jose Robinson, Terence J Genome Biol Research BACKGROUND: A fundamental question in comparative genomics concerns the identification of mechanisms that underpin chromosomal change. In an attempt to shed light on the dynamics of mammalian genome evolution, we analyzed the distribution of syntenic blocks, evolutionary breakpoint regions, and evolutionary breakpoints taken from public databases available for seven eutherian species (mouse, rat, cattle, dog, pig, cat, and horse) and the chicken, and examined these for correspondence with human fragile sites and tandem repeats. RESULTS: Our results confirm previous investigations that showed the presence of chromosomal regions in the human genome that have been repeatedly used as illustrated by a high breakpoint accumulation in certain chromosomes and chromosomal bands. We show, however, that there is a striking correspondence between fragile site location, the positions of evolutionary breakpoints, and the distribution of tandem repeats throughout the human genome, which similarly reflect a non-uniform pattern of occurrence. CONCLUSION: These observations provide further evidence that certain chromosomal regions in the human genome have been repeatedly used in the evolutionary process. As a consequence, the genome is a composite of fragile regions prone to reorganization that have been conserved in different lineages, and genomic tracts that do not exhibit the same levels of evolutionary plasticity. BioMed Central 2006 2006-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC1794428/ /pubmed/17156441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2006-7-12-r115 Text en Copyright © 2006 Ruiz-Herrera et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Ruiz-Herrera, Aurora Castresana, Jose Robinson, Terence J Is mammalian chromosomal evolution driven by regions of genome fragility? |
title | Is mammalian chromosomal evolution driven by regions of genome fragility? |
title_full | Is mammalian chromosomal evolution driven by regions of genome fragility? |
title_fullStr | Is mammalian chromosomal evolution driven by regions of genome fragility? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is mammalian chromosomal evolution driven by regions of genome fragility? |
title_short | Is mammalian chromosomal evolution driven by regions of genome fragility? |
title_sort | is mammalian chromosomal evolution driven by regions of genome fragility? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1794428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17156441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2006-7-12-r115 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ruizherreraaurora ismammalianchromosomalevolutiondrivenbyregionsofgenomefragility AT castresanajose ismammalianchromosomalevolutiondrivenbyregionsofgenomefragility AT robinsonterencej ismammalianchromosomalevolutiondrivenbyregionsofgenomefragility |