Cargando…
Can you justify not using ultrasound guidance for central venous access?
Karakitsos and coworkers, in this journal, reported further compelling evidence on the value of ultrasound in guiding internal jugular vein catheterization. In a large, prospective, randomized study of 900 patients, comparisons were made between patients in whom the procedure was performed using lan...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1794450/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17129362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5079 |
_version_ | 1782132179723091968 |
---|---|
author | Bodenham, Andrew R |
author_facet | Bodenham, Andrew R |
author_sort | Bodenham, Andrew R |
collection | PubMed |
description | Karakitsos and coworkers, in this journal, reported further compelling evidence on the value of ultrasound in guiding internal jugular vein catheterization. In a large, prospective, randomized study of 900 patients, comparisons were made between patients in whom the procedure was performed using landmark-based techniques and those assigned to ultrasound guidance. The key benefits from use of ultrasound included reduction in needle puncture time, increased overall success rate (100% versus 94%), reduction in carotid puncture (1% versus 11%), reduction in carotid haematoma (0.4% versus 8.4%), reduction in haemothorax (0% versus 1.7%), decreased pneumothorax (0% versus 2.4%) and reduction in catheter-related infection (10% versus 16%). The implications of these findings are discussed, and a compelling case for routine use of ultrasound to guide central venous access is made. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1794450 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-17944502007-02-08 Can you justify not using ultrasound guidance for central venous access? Bodenham, Andrew R Crit Care Commentary Karakitsos and coworkers, in this journal, reported further compelling evidence on the value of ultrasound in guiding internal jugular vein catheterization. In a large, prospective, randomized study of 900 patients, comparisons were made between patients in whom the procedure was performed using landmark-based techniques and those assigned to ultrasound guidance. The key benefits from use of ultrasound included reduction in needle puncture time, increased overall success rate (100% versus 94%), reduction in carotid puncture (1% versus 11%), reduction in carotid haematoma (0.4% versus 8.4%), reduction in haemothorax (0% versus 1.7%), decreased pneumothorax (0% versus 2.4%) and reduction in catheter-related infection (10% versus 16%). The implications of these findings are discussed, and a compelling case for routine use of ultrasound to guide central venous access is made. BioMed Central 2006 2006-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC1794450/ /pubmed/17129362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5079 Text en Copyright © 2006 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Bodenham, Andrew R Can you justify not using ultrasound guidance for central venous access? |
title | Can you justify not using ultrasound guidance for central venous access? |
title_full | Can you justify not using ultrasound guidance for central venous access? |
title_fullStr | Can you justify not using ultrasound guidance for central venous access? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can you justify not using ultrasound guidance for central venous access? |
title_short | Can you justify not using ultrasound guidance for central venous access? |
title_sort | can you justify not using ultrasound guidance for central venous access? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1794450/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17129362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5079 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bodenhamandrewr canyoujustifynotusingultrasoundguidanceforcentralvenousaccess |