Cargando…
Bench-to-bedside review: High-frequency oscillatory ventilation in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome
Mechanical ventilation is the cornerstone of therapy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Paradoxically, mechanical ventilation can exacerbate lung damage – a phenomenon known as ventilator-induced lung injury. While new ventilation strategies have reduced the mortality rate...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1794464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17184554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5096 |
_version_ | 1782132183596531712 |
---|---|
author | Downar, James Mehta, Sangeeta |
author_facet | Downar, James Mehta, Sangeeta |
author_sort | Downar, James |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mechanical ventilation is the cornerstone of therapy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Paradoxically, mechanical ventilation can exacerbate lung damage – a phenomenon known as ventilator-induced lung injury. While new ventilation strategies have reduced the mortality rate in patients with ARDS, this mortality rate still remains high. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) is an unconventional form of ventilation that may improve oxygenation in patients with ARDS, while limiting further lung injury associated with high ventilatory pressures and volumes delivered during conventional ventilation. HFOV has been used for almost two decades in the neonatal population, but there is more limited experience with HFOV in the adult population. In adults, the majority of the published literature is in the form of small observational studies in which HFOV was used as 'rescue' therapy for patients with very severe ARDS who were failing conventional ventilation. Two prospective randomized controlled trials, however, while showing no mortality benefit, have suggested that HFOV, compared with conventional ventilation, is a safe and effective ventilation strategy for adults with ARDS. Several studies suggest that HFOV may improve outcomes if used early in the course of ARDS, or if used in certain populations. This review will summarize the evidence supporting the use of HFOV in adults with ARDS. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1794464 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-17944642007-02-08 Bench-to-bedside review: High-frequency oscillatory ventilation in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome Downar, James Mehta, Sangeeta Crit Care Review Mechanical ventilation is the cornerstone of therapy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Paradoxically, mechanical ventilation can exacerbate lung damage – a phenomenon known as ventilator-induced lung injury. While new ventilation strategies have reduced the mortality rate in patients with ARDS, this mortality rate still remains high. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) is an unconventional form of ventilation that may improve oxygenation in patients with ARDS, while limiting further lung injury associated with high ventilatory pressures and volumes delivered during conventional ventilation. HFOV has been used for almost two decades in the neonatal population, but there is more limited experience with HFOV in the adult population. In adults, the majority of the published literature is in the form of small observational studies in which HFOV was used as 'rescue' therapy for patients with very severe ARDS who were failing conventional ventilation. Two prospective randomized controlled trials, however, while showing no mortality benefit, have suggested that HFOV, compared with conventional ventilation, is a safe and effective ventilation strategy for adults with ARDS. Several studies suggest that HFOV may improve outcomes if used early in the course of ARDS, or if used in certain populations. This review will summarize the evidence supporting the use of HFOV in adults with ARDS. BioMed Central 2006 2006-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC1794464/ /pubmed/17184554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5096 Text en Copyright © 2006 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Review Downar, James Mehta, Sangeeta Bench-to-bedside review: High-frequency oscillatory ventilation in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome |
title | Bench-to-bedside review: High-frequency oscillatory ventilation in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome |
title_full | Bench-to-bedside review: High-frequency oscillatory ventilation in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome |
title_fullStr | Bench-to-bedside review: High-frequency oscillatory ventilation in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome |
title_full_unstemmed | Bench-to-bedside review: High-frequency oscillatory ventilation in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome |
title_short | Bench-to-bedside review: High-frequency oscillatory ventilation in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome |
title_sort | bench-to-bedside review: high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1794464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17184554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5096 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT downarjames benchtobedsidereviewhighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinadultswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT mehtasangeeta benchtobedsidereviewhighfrequencyoscillatoryventilationinadultswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome |