Cargando…

Sporadic renal cell carcinoma in young and elderly patients: are there different clinicopathological features and disease specific survival rates?

BACKGROUND: Sporadic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is rare in young adults. In the present retrospective study we reviewed clinicopathological features and disease specific survival rates in young patients (≤45 years) with RCC and compared them to old patients (≥75 years) with RCC. METHODS: Between 199...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Denzinger, Stefan, Otto, Wolfgang, Burger, Maximilian, Hammerschmied, Christine, Junker, Kerstin, Hartmann, Arndt, Wieland, Wolf F, Walter, Bernhard
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1797177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17280613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-5-16
_version_ 1782132304777314304
author Denzinger, Stefan
Otto, Wolfgang
Burger, Maximilian
Hammerschmied, Christine
Junker, Kerstin
Hartmann, Arndt
Wieland, Wolf F
Walter, Bernhard
author_facet Denzinger, Stefan
Otto, Wolfgang
Burger, Maximilian
Hammerschmied, Christine
Junker, Kerstin
Hartmann, Arndt
Wieland, Wolf F
Walter, Bernhard
author_sort Denzinger, Stefan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sporadic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is rare in young adults. In the present retrospective study we reviewed clinicopathological features and disease specific survival rates in young patients (≤45 years) with RCC and compared them to old patients (≥75 years) with RCC. METHODS: Between 1992 and 2005 a total of 1042 patients were treated for RCC at our institution. We found 70 patients 45 years or younger (YP) and 150 patients 75 years or older (OP) at time of diagnosis. There were no differences in therapeutical approaches between both groups. Clinical and biologic parameters at diagnosis were compared and subjected to uni- and multivariate analysis to study cancer specific survival and progression rate. Mean postoperative follow-up in both groups was 50.1 months. RESULTS: Mean age was 39 years in YP and 80 years in OP, respectively. YP demonstrated significantly lower stage (pT1-pT2 N0 M0, p = 0.03), lower tumor grade (p = 0.01) and higher male-to-female ratio (p < 0.001). The rate of lymph node metastases or distant metastatic disease at presentation did not differ significantly between both groups. In multivariate analysis young age was independently associated with a higher 5-year cancer specific survival (95.2% vs. 72.3%, p = 0.009) and a lower 5-year progression rate (11.3% vs. 42.5%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Sporadic RCC in young patients have lower tumor stages and grades and a better outcome compared to elderly. Age≤45 years was an independent prognostic factor for survival and progression.
format Text
id pubmed-1797177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-17971772007-02-14 Sporadic renal cell carcinoma in young and elderly patients: are there different clinicopathological features and disease specific survival rates? Denzinger, Stefan Otto, Wolfgang Burger, Maximilian Hammerschmied, Christine Junker, Kerstin Hartmann, Arndt Wieland, Wolf F Walter, Bernhard World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Sporadic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is rare in young adults. In the present retrospective study we reviewed clinicopathological features and disease specific survival rates in young patients (≤45 years) with RCC and compared them to old patients (≥75 years) with RCC. METHODS: Between 1992 and 2005 a total of 1042 patients were treated for RCC at our institution. We found 70 patients 45 years or younger (YP) and 150 patients 75 years or older (OP) at time of diagnosis. There were no differences in therapeutical approaches between both groups. Clinical and biologic parameters at diagnosis were compared and subjected to uni- and multivariate analysis to study cancer specific survival and progression rate. Mean postoperative follow-up in both groups was 50.1 months. RESULTS: Mean age was 39 years in YP and 80 years in OP, respectively. YP demonstrated significantly lower stage (pT1-pT2 N0 M0, p = 0.03), lower tumor grade (p = 0.01) and higher male-to-female ratio (p < 0.001). The rate of lymph node metastases or distant metastatic disease at presentation did not differ significantly between both groups. In multivariate analysis young age was independently associated with a higher 5-year cancer specific survival (95.2% vs. 72.3%, p = 0.009) and a lower 5-year progression rate (11.3% vs. 42.5%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Sporadic RCC in young patients have lower tumor stages and grades and a better outcome compared to elderly. Age≤45 years was an independent prognostic factor for survival and progression. BioMed Central 2007-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC1797177/ /pubmed/17280613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-5-16 Text en Copyright © 2007 Denzinger et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Denzinger, Stefan
Otto, Wolfgang
Burger, Maximilian
Hammerschmied, Christine
Junker, Kerstin
Hartmann, Arndt
Wieland, Wolf F
Walter, Bernhard
Sporadic renal cell carcinoma in young and elderly patients: are there different clinicopathological features and disease specific survival rates?
title Sporadic renal cell carcinoma in young and elderly patients: are there different clinicopathological features and disease specific survival rates?
title_full Sporadic renal cell carcinoma in young and elderly patients: are there different clinicopathological features and disease specific survival rates?
title_fullStr Sporadic renal cell carcinoma in young and elderly patients: are there different clinicopathological features and disease specific survival rates?
title_full_unstemmed Sporadic renal cell carcinoma in young and elderly patients: are there different clinicopathological features and disease specific survival rates?
title_short Sporadic renal cell carcinoma in young and elderly patients: are there different clinicopathological features and disease specific survival rates?
title_sort sporadic renal cell carcinoma in young and elderly patients: are there different clinicopathological features and disease specific survival rates?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1797177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17280613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-5-16
work_keys_str_mv AT denzingerstefan sporadicrenalcellcarcinomainyoungandelderlypatientsaretheredifferentclinicopathologicalfeaturesanddiseasespecificsurvivalrates
AT ottowolfgang sporadicrenalcellcarcinomainyoungandelderlypatientsaretheredifferentclinicopathologicalfeaturesanddiseasespecificsurvivalrates
AT burgermaximilian sporadicrenalcellcarcinomainyoungandelderlypatientsaretheredifferentclinicopathologicalfeaturesanddiseasespecificsurvivalrates
AT hammerschmiedchristine sporadicrenalcellcarcinomainyoungandelderlypatientsaretheredifferentclinicopathologicalfeaturesanddiseasespecificsurvivalrates
AT junkerkerstin sporadicrenalcellcarcinomainyoungandelderlypatientsaretheredifferentclinicopathologicalfeaturesanddiseasespecificsurvivalrates
AT hartmannarndt sporadicrenalcellcarcinomainyoungandelderlypatientsaretheredifferentclinicopathologicalfeaturesanddiseasespecificsurvivalrates
AT wielandwolff sporadicrenalcellcarcinomainyoungandelderlypatientsaretheredifferentclinicopathologicalfeaturesanddiseasespecificsurvivalrates
AT walterbernhard sporadicrenalcellcarcinomainyoungandelderlypatientsaretheredifferentclinicopathologicalfeaturesanddiseasespecificsurvivalrates