Cargando…

The association of cancer survival with four socioeconomic indicators: a longitudinal study of the older population of England and Wales 1981–2000

BACKGROUND: Many studies have found socioeconomic differentials in cancer survival. Previous studies have generally demonstrated poorer cancer survival with decreasing socioeconomic status but mostly used only ecological measures of status and analytical methods estimating simple survival. This stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sloggett, Andrew, Young, Harriet, Grundy, Emily
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1797185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17254357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-7-20
_version_ 1782132307176456192
author Sloggett, Andrew
Young, Harriet
Grundy, Emily
author_facet Sloggett, Andrew
Young, Harriet
Grundy, Emily
author_sort Sloggett, Andrew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many studies have found socioeconomic differentials in cancer survival. Previous studies have generally demonstrated poorer cancer survival with decreasing socioeconomic status but mostly used only ecological measures of status and analytical methods estimating simple survival. This study investigate socio-economic differentials in cancer survival using four indicators of socioeconomic status; three individual and one ecological. It uses a relative survival method which gives a measure of excess mortality due to cancer. METHODS: This study uses prospective record linkage data from The Office for National Statistics Longitudinal Study for England and Wales. The participants are Longitudinal Study members, recorded at census in 1971 and 1981 and with a primary malignant cancer diagnosed at age 45 or above, between 1981 and 1997, with follow-up until end 2000. The outcome measure is relative survival/excess mortality, compared with age and sex adjusted survival of the general population. Relative survival and Poisson regression analyses are presented, giving models of relative excess mortality, adjusted for covariates. RESULTS: Different socioeconomic indicators detect survival differentials of varying magnitude and definition. For all cancers combined, the four indicators show similar effects. For individual cancers there are differences between indicators. Where there is an association, all indicators show poorer survival with lower socioeconomic status. CONCLUSION: Cancer survival differs markedly by socio-economic status. The commonly used ecological measure, the Carstairs Index, is adequate at demonstrating socioeconomic differentials in survival for combined cancers and some individual cancers. A combination of car access and housing tenure is more sensitive than the ecological Carstairs measure at detecting socioeconomic effects on survival – confirming Carstairs effects where they occur but additionally identifying effects for other cancers. Social class is a relatively weak indicator of survival differentials.
format Text
id pubmed-1797185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-17971852007-02-14 The association of cancer survival with four socioeconomic indicators: a longitudinal study of the older population of England and Wales 1981–2000 Sloggett, Andrew Young, Harriet Grundy, Emily BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Many studies have found socioeconomic differentials in cancer survival. Previous studies have generally demonstrated poorer cancer survival with decreasing socioeconomic status but mostly used only ecological measures of status and analytical methods estimating simple survival. This study investigate socio-economic differentials in cancer survival using four indicators of socioeconomic status; three individual and one ecological. It uses a relative survival method which gives a measure of excess mortality due to cancer. METHODS: This study uses prospective record linkage data from The Office for National Statistics Longitudinal Study for England and Wales. The participants are Longitudinal Study members, recorded at census in 1971 and 1981 and with a primary malignant cancer diagnosed at age 45 or above, between 1981 and 1997, with follow-up until end 2000. The outcome measure is relative survival/excess mortality, compared with age and sex adjusted survival of the general population. Relative survival and Poisson regression analyses are presented, giving models of relative excess mortality, adjusted for covariates. RESULTS: Different socioeconomic indicators detect survival differentials of varying magnitude and definition. For all cancers combined, the four indicators show similar effects. For individual cancers there are differences between indicators. Where there is an association, all indicators show poorer survival with lower socioeconomic status. CONCLUSION: Cancer survival differs markedly by socio-economic status. The commonly used ecological measure, the Carstairs Index, is adequate at demonstrating socioeconomic differentials in survival for combined cancers and some individual cancers. A combination of car access and housing tenure is more sensitive than the ecological Carstairs measure at detecting socioeconomic effects on survival – confirming Carstairs effects where they occur but additionally identifying effects for other cancers. Social class is a relatively weak indicator of survival differentials. BioMed Central 2007-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC1797185/ /pubmed/17254357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-7-20 Text en Copyright © 2007 Sloggett et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sloggett, Andrew
Young, Harriet
Grundy, Emily
The association of cancer survival with four socioeconomic indicators: a longitudinal study of the older population of England and Wales 1981–2000
title The association of cancer survival with four socioeconomic indicators: a longitudinal study of the older population of England and Wales 1981–2000
title_full The association of cancer survival with four socioeconomic indicators: a longitudinal study of the older population of England and Wales 1981–2000
title_fullStr The association of cancer survival with four socioeconomic indicators: a longitudinal study of the older population of England and Wales 1981–2000
title_full_unstemmed The association of cancer survival with four socioeconomic indicators: a longitudinal study of the older population of England and Wales 1981–2000
title_short The association of cancer survival with four socioeconomic indicators: a longitudinal study of the older population of England and Wales 1981–2000
title_sort association of cancer survival with four socioeconomic indicators: a longitudinal study of the older population of england and wales 1981–2000
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1797185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17254357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-7-20
work_keys_str_mv AT sloggettandrew theassociationofcancersurvivalwithfoursocioeconomicindicatorsalongitudinalstudyoftheolderpopulationofenglandandwales19812000
AT youngharriet theassociationofcancersurvivalwithfoursocioeconomicindicatorsalongitudinalstudyoftheolderpopulationofenglandandwales19812000
AT grundyemily theassociationofcancersurvivalwithfoursocioeconomicindicatorsalongitudinalstudyoftheolderpopulationofenglandandwales19812000
AT sloggettandrew associationofcancersurvivalwithfoursocioeconomicindicatorsalongitudinalstudyoftheolderpopulationofenglandandwales19812000
AT youngharriet associationofcancersurvivalwithfoursocioeconomicindicatorsalongitudinalstudyoftheolderpopulationofenglandandwales19812000
AT grundyemily associationofcancersurvivalwithfoursocioeconomicindicatorsalongitudinalstudyoftheolderpopulationofenglandandwales19812000