Cargando…

Auditory Short-Term Memory Behaves Like Visual Short-Term Memory

Are the information processing steps that support short-term sensory memory common to all the senses? Systematic, psychophysical comparison requires identical experimental paradigms and comparable stimuli, which can be challenging to obtain across modalities. Participants performed a recognition mem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Visscher, Kristina M, Kaplan, Elina, Kahana, Michael J, Sekuler, Robert
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1800308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17311472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050056
_version_ 1782132338523635712
author Visscher, Kristina M
Kaplan, Elina
Kahana, Michael J
Sekuler, Robert
author_facet Visscher, Kristina M
Kaplan, Elina
Kahana, Michael J
Sekuler, Robert
author_sort Visscher, Kristina M
collection PubMed
description Are the information processing steps that support short-term sensory memory common to all the senses? Systematic, psychophysical comparison requires identical experimental paradigms and comparable stimuli, which can be challenging to obtain across modalities. Participants performed a recognition memory task with auditory and visual stimuli that were comparable in complexity and in their neural representations at early stages of cortical processing. The visual stimuli were static and moving Gaussian-windowed, oriented, sinusoidal gratings (Gabor patches); the auditory stimuli were broadband sounds whose frequency content varied sinusoidally over time (moving ripples). Parallel effects on recognition memory were seen for number of items to be remembered, retention interval, and serial position. Further, regardless of modality, predicting an item's recognizability requires taking account of (1) the probe's similarity to the remembered list items (summed similarity), and (2) the similarity between the items in memory (inter-item homogeneity). A model incorporating both these factors gives a good fit to recognition memory data for auditory as well as visual stimuli. In addition, we present the first demonstration of the orthogonality of summed similarity and inter-item homogeneity effects. These data imply that auditory and visual representations undergo very similar transformations while they are encoded and retrieved from memory.
format Text
id pubmed-1800308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18003082007-02-20 Auditory Short-Term Memory Behaves Like Visual Short-Term Memory Visscher, Kristina M Kaplan, Elina Kahana, Michael J Sekuler, Robert PLoS Biol Research Article Are the information processing steps that support short-term sensory memory common to all the senses? Systematic, psychophysical comparison requires identical experimental paradigms and comparable stimuli, which can be challenging to obtain across modalities. Participants performed a recognition memory task with auditory and visual stimuli that were comparable in complexity and in their neural representations at early stages of cortical processing. The visual stimuli were static and moving Gaussian-windowed, oriented, sinusoidal gratings (Gabor patches); the auditory stimuli were broadband sounds whose frequency content varied sinusoidally over time (moving ripples). Parallel effects on recognition memory were seen for number of items to be remembered, retention interval, and serial position. Further, regardless of modality, predicting an item's recognizability requires taking account of (1) the probe's similarity to the remembered list items (summed similarity), and (2) the similarity between the items in memory (inter-item homogeneity). A model incorporating both these factors gives a good fit to recognition memory data for auditory as well as visual stimuli. In addition, we present the first demonstration of the orthogonality of summed similarity and inter-item homogeneity effects. These data imply that auditory and visual representations undergo very similar transformations while they are encoded and retrieved from memory. Public Library of Science 2007-03 2007-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC1800308/ /pubmed/17311472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050056 Text en © 2007 Visscher et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Visscher, Kristina M
Kaplan, Elina
Kahana, Michael J
Sekuler, Robert
Auditory Short-Term Memory Behaves Like Visual Short-Term Memory
title Auditory Short-Term Memory Behaves Like Visual Short-Term Memory
title_full Auditory Short-Term Memory Behaves Like Visual Short-Term Memory
title_fullStr Auditory Short-Term Memory Behaves Like Visual Short-Term Memory
title_full_unstemmed Auditory Short-Term Memory Behaves Like Visual Short-Term Memory
title_short Auditory Short-Term Memory Behaves Like Visual Short-Term Memory
title_sort auditory short-term memory behaves like visual short-term memory
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1800308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17311472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050056
work_keys_str_mv AT visscherkristinam auditoryshorttermmemorybehaveslikevisualshorttermmemory
AT kaplanelina auditoryshorttermmemorybehaveslikevisualshorttermmemory
AT kahanamichaelj auditoryshorttermmemorybehaveslikevisualshorttermmemory
AT sekulerrobert auditoryshorttermmemorybehaveslikevisualshorttermmemory