Cargando…

Are upright lateral cervical radiographs in the obtunded trauma patient useful? A retrospective study

BACKGROUND: The best method for radiographic "clearance" of the cervical spine in obtunded patients prior to removal of cervical immobilization devices remains debated. Dynamic radiographs or MRI are thought to demonstrate unstable injuries, but can be expensive and cumbersome to obtain. A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rabb, Craig H, Johnson, Jeffrey L, VanSickle, David, Beauchamp, Kathryn, Bolles, Gene, Moore, Ernest E
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1802734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17288614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-2-4
_version_ 1782132402399739904
author Rabb, Craig H
Johnson, Jeffrey L
VanSickle, David
Beauchamp, Kathryn
Bolles, Gene
Moore, Ernest E
author_facet Rabb, Craig H
Johnson, Jeffrey L
VanSickle, David
Beauchamp, Kathryn
Bolles, Gene
Moore, Ernest E
author_sort Rabb, Craig H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The best method for radiographic "clearance" of the cervical spine in obtunded patients prior to removal of cervical immobilization devices remains debated. Dynamic radiographs or MRI are thought to demonstrate unstable injuries, but can be expensive and cumbersome to obtain. An upright lateral cervical radiograph (ULCR) was performed in selected patients to investigate whether this study could provide this same information, to enable removal of cervical immobilization devices in the multiple trauma patient. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our experience with ULCR in 683 blunt trauma victims who presented over a 3-year period, with either a Glasgow Coma Score <13 or who were intubated at the time of presentation. RESULTS: ULCR was performed in 163 patients. Seven patients had studies interpreted to be abnormal, of which six were also abnormal, by either CT or MRI. The seventh patient's only abnormality was soft tissue swelling; MRI was otherwise normal. Six patients had ULCR interpreted as normal, but had abnormalities on either CT or MRI. None of the missed injuries required surgical stabilization, although one had a vertebral artery injury demonstrated on subsequent angiography. ULCR had an apparent sensitivity of 45.5% and specificity of 71.4%. CONCLUSION: ULCR are inferior to both CT and MRI in the detection of cervical injury in patients with normal plain radiographs. We therefore cannot recommend the use of ULCR in the obtunded trauma patient.
format Text
id pubmed-1802734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18027342007-02-22 Are upright lateral cervical radiographs in the obtunded trauma patient useful? A retrospective study Rabb, Craig H Johnson, Jeffrey L VanSickle, David Beauchamp, Kathryn Bolles, Gene Moore, Ernest E World J Emerg Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: The best method for radiographic "clearance" of the cervical spine in obtunded patients prior to removal of cervical immobilization devices remains debated. Dynamic radiographs or MRI are thought to demonstrate unstable injuries, but can be expensive and cumbersome to obtain. An upright lateral cervical radiograph (ULCR) was performed in selected patients to investigate whether this study could provide this same information, to enable removal of cervical immobilization devices in the multiple trauma patient. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our experience with ULCR in 683 blunt trauma victims who presented over a 3-year period, with either a Glasgow Coma Score <13 or who were intubated at the time of presentation. RESULTS: ULCR was performed in 163 patients. Seven patients had studies interpreted to be abnormal, of which six were also abnormal, by either CT or MRI. The seventh patient's only abnormality was soft tissue swelling; MRI was otherwise normal. Six patients had ULCR interpreted as normal, but had abnormalities on either CT or MRI. None of the missed injuries required surgical stabilization, although one had a vertebral artery injury demonstrated on subsequent angiography. ULCR had an apparent sensitivity of 45.5% and specificity of 71.4%. CONCLUSION: ULCR are inferior to both CT and MRI in the detection of cervical injury in patients with normal plain radiographs. We therefore cannot recommend the use of ULCR in the obtunded trauma patient. BioMed Central 2007-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC1802734/ /pubmed/17288614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-2-4 Text en Copyright © 2007 Rabb et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rabb, Craig H
Johnson, Jeffrey L
VanSickle, David
Beauchamp, Kathryn
Bolles, Gene
Moore, Ernest E
Are upright lateral cervical radiographs in the obtunded trauma patient useful? A retrospective study
title Are upright lateral cervical radiographs in the obtunded trauma patient useful? A retrospective study
title_full Are upright lateral cervical radiographs in the obtunded trauma patient useful? A retrospective study
title_fullStr Are upright lateral cervical radiographs in the obtunded trauma patient useful? A retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Are upright lateral cervical radiographs in the obtunded trauma patient useful? A retrospective study
title_short Are upright lateral cervical radiographs in the obtunded trauma patient useful? A retrospective study
title_sort are upright lateral cervical radiographs in the obtunded trauma patient useful? a retrospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1802734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17288614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-2-4
work_keys_str_mv AT rabbcraigh areuprightlateralcervicalradiographsintheobtundedtraumapatientusefularetrospectivestudy
AT johnsonjeffreyl areuprightlateralcervicalradiographsintheobtundedtraumapatientusefularetrospectivestudy
AT vansickledavid areuprightlateralcervicalradiographsintheobtundedtraumapatientusefularetrospectivestudy
AT beauchampkathryn areuprightlateralcervicalradiographsintheobtundedtraumapatientusefularetrospectivestudy
AT bollesgene areuprightlateralcervicalradiographsintheobtundedtraumapatientusefularetrospectivestudy
AT mooreerneste areuprightlateralcervicalradiographsintheobtundedtraumapatientusefularetrospectivestudy