Cargando…

Revisiting the Basic Reproductive Number for Malaria and Its Implications for Malaria Control

The prospects for the success of malaria control depend, in part, on the basic reproductive number for malaria, R (0). Here, we estimate R (0) in a novel way for 121 African populations, and thereby increase the number of R (0) estimates for malaria by an order of magnitude. The estimates range from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, David L, McKenzie, F. Ellis, Snow, Robert W, Hay, Simon I
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1802755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17311470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050042
_version_ 1782132409306710016
author Smith, David L
McKenzie, F. Ellis
Snow, Robert W
Hay, Simon I
author_facet Smith, David L
McKenzie, F. Ellis
Snow, Robert W
Hay, Simon I
author_sort Smith, David L
collection PubMed
description The prospects for the success of malaria control depend, in part, on the basic reproductive number for malaria, R (0). Here, we estimate R (0) in a novel way for 121 African populations, and thereby increase the number of R (0) estimates for malaria by an order of magnitude. The estimates range from around one to more than 3,000. We also consider malaria transmission and control in finite human populations, of size H. We show that classic formulas approximate the expected number of mosquitoes that could trace infection back to one mosquito after one parasite generation, Z (0)(H), but they overestimate the expected number of infected humans per infected human, R (0)(H). Heterogeneous biting increases R (0) and, as we show, Z (0)(H), but we also show that it sometimes reduces R (0)(H); those who are bitten most both infect many vectors and absorb infectious bites. The large range of R (0) estimates strongly supports the long-held notion that malaria control presents variable challenges across its transmission spectrum. In populations where R (0) is highest, malaria control will require multiple, integrated methods that target those who are bitten most. Therefore, strategic planning for malaria control should consider R (0), the spatial scale of transmission, human population density, and heterogeneous biting.
format Text
id pubmed-1802755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18027552007-02-22 Revisiting the Basic Reproductive Number for Malaria and Its Implications for Malaria Control Smith, David L McKenzie, F. Ellis Snow, Robert W Hay, Simon I PLoS Biol Research Article The prospects for the success of malaria control depend, in part, on the basic reproductive number for malaria, R (0). Here, we estimate R (0) in a novel way for 121 African populations, and thereby increase the number of R (0) estimates for malaria by an order of magnitude. The estimates range from around one to more than 3,000. We also consider malaria transmission and control in finite human populations, of size H. We show that classic formulas approximate the expected number of mosquitoes that could trace infection back to one mosquito after one parasite generation, Z (0)(H), but they overestimate the expected number of infected humans per infected human, R (0)(H). Heterogeneous biting increases R (0) and, as we show, Z (0)(H), but we also show that it sometimes reduces R (0)(H); those who are bitten most both infect many vectors and absorb infectious bites. The large range of R (0) estimates strongly supports the long-held notion that malaria control presents variable challenges across its transmission spectrum. In populations where R (0) is highest, malaria control will require multiple, integrated methods that target those who are bitten most. Therefore, strategic planning for malaria control should consider R (0), the spatial scale of transmission, human population density, and heterogeneous biting. Public Library of Science 2007-03 2007-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC1802755/ /pubmed/17311470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050042 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Smith, David L
McKenzie, F. Ellis
Snow, Robert W
Hay, Simon I
Revisiting the Basic Reproductive Number for Malaria and Its Implications for Malaria Control
title Revisiting the Basic Reproductive Number for Malaria and Its Implications for Malaria Control
title_full Revisiting the Basic Reproductive Number for Malaria and Its Implications for Malaria Control
title_fullStr Revisiting the Basic Reproductive Number for Malaria and Its Implications for Malaria Control
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting the Basic Reproductive Number for Malaria and Its Implications for Malaria Control
title_short Revisiting the Basic Reproductive Number for Malaria and Its Implications for Malaria Control
title_sort revisiting the basic reproductive number for malaria and its implications for malaria control
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1802755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17311470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050042
work_keys_str_mv AT smithdavidl revisitingthebasicreproductivenumberformalariaanditsimplicationsformalariacontrol
AT mckenziefellis revisitingthebasicreproductivenumberformalariaanditsimplicationsformalariacontrol
AT snowrobertw revisitingthebasicreproductivenumberformalariaanditsimplicationsformalariacontrol
AT haysimoni revisitingthebasicreproductivenumberformalariaanditsimplicationsformalariacontrol