Cargando…

Evaluation of the TEG(® )platelet mapping™ assay in blood donors

BACKGROUND: Monitoring of antiplatelet therapy in patients at cardiovascular risk is difficult because existing platelet function tests are too sophisticated for clinical routine. The whole blood TEG(® )Platelet Mapping™ assay measures clot strength as maximal amplitude (MA) and enables for quantifi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bochsen, Louise, Wiinberg, Bo, Kjelgaard-Hansen, Mads, Steinbrüchel, Daniel A, Johansson, Pär I
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1804261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17311677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-9560-5-3
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Monitoring of antiplatelet therapy in patients at cardiovascular risk is difficult because existing platelet function tests are too sophisticated for clinical routine. The whole blood TEG(® )Platelet Mapping™ assay measures clot strength as maximal amplitude (MA) and enables for quantification of platelet function, including the contribution of the adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and thromboxane A2 (TxA2) receptors to clot formation. METHODS: In 43 healthy blood donors, the analytical (CV(a)) and inter-individual variability (CV(g)) of the TEG(® )Platelet Mapping™ assay were determined together with platelet receptor inhibition in response to arachidonic acid (AA) and ADP. RESULTS: The CV(a )of the assay for maximal platelet contribution to clot strength (MA(Thrombin)) was 3.5%, for the fibrin contribution to clot strength (MA(Fibrin)) 5.2%, for MA(AA )4.5% and for MA(ADP )it was 6.6%. The MA(Thrombin )CV(g )was 2.8%, MA(Fibrin )4.7%, MA(AA )6.6% and for MA(ADP )it was 26.2%. Females had a higher MA(Thrombin )compared to males (62.8 vs. 58.4 mm, p = 0.005). The platelet TxA2 receptor inhibition was 1.2% (range 0–10%) and lower than for the ADP receptor (18.6% (0–58%); p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The high variability in ADP receptor inhibition may explain both the differences in response to ADP receptor inhibitor therapy and why major bleeding sometimes develops during surgery in patients not treated with ADP receptor inhibitors. An analytical variation of ~5 % for the TEG(® )enables, however, for routine monitoring of the variability in ADP receptor inhibition and of antiplatelet therapy.