Cargando…

Evaluation of the TEG(® )platelet mapping™ assay in blood donors

BACKGROUND: Monitoring of antiplatelet therapy in patients at cardiovascular risk is difficult because existing platelet function tests are too sophisticated for clinical routine. The whole blood TEG(® )Platelet Mapping™ assay measures clot strength as maximal amplitude (MA) and enables for quantifi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bochsen, Louise, Wiinberg, Bo, Kjelgaard-Hansen, Mads, Steinbrüchel, Daniel A, Johansson, Pär I
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1804261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17311677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-9560-5-3
_version_ 1782132443545862144
author Bochsen, Louise
Wiinberg, Bo
Kjelgaard-Hansen, Mads
Steinbrüchel, Daniel A
Johansson, Pär I
author_facet Bochsen, Louise
Wiinberg, Bo
Kjelgaard-Hansen, Mads
Steinbrüchel, Daniel A
Johansson, Pär I
author_sort Bochsen, Louise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Monitoring of antiplatelet therapy in patients at cardiovascular risk is difficult because existing platelet function tests are too sophisticated for clinical routine. The whole blood TEG(® )Platelet Mapping™ assay measures clot strength as maximal amplitude (MA) and enables for quantification of platelet function, including the contribution of the adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and thromboxane A2 (TxA2) receptors to clot formation. METHODS: In 43 healthy blood donors, the analytical (CV(a)) and inter-individual variability (CV(g)) of the TEG(® )Platelet Mapping™ assay were determined together with platelet receptor inhibition in response to arachidonic acid (AA) and ADP. RESULTS: The CV(a )of the assay for maximal platelet contribution to clot strength (MA(Thrombin)) was 3.5%, for the fibrin contribution to clot strength (MA(Fibrin)) 5.2%, for MA(AA )4.5% and for MA(ADP )it was 6.6%. The MA(Thrombin )CV(g )was 2.8%, MA(Fibrin )4.7%, MA(AA )6.6% and for MA(ADP )it was 26.2%. Females had a higher MA(Thrombin )compared to males (62.8 vs. 58.4 mm, p = 0.005). The platelet TxA2 receptor inhibition was 1.2% (range 0–10%) and lower than for the ADP receptor (18.6% (0–58%); p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The high variability in ADP receptor inhibition may explain both the differences in response to ADP receptor inhibitor therapy and why major bleeding sometimes develops during surgery in patients not treated with ADP receptor inhibitors. An analytical variation of ~5 % for the TEG(® )enables, however, for routine monitoring of the variability in ADP receptor inhibition and of antiplatelet therapy.
format Text
id pubmed-1804261
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18042612007-02-24 Evaluation of the TEG(® )platelet mapping™ assay in blood donors Bochsen, Louise Wiinberg, Bo Kjelgaard-Hansen, Mads Steinbrüchel, Daniel A Johansson, Pär I Thromb J Original Clinical Investigation BACKGROUND: Monitoring of antiplatelet therapy in patients at cardiovascular risk is difficult because existing platelet function tests are too sophisticated for clinical routine. The whole blood TEG(® )Platelet Mapping™ assay measures clot strength as maximal amplitude (MA) and enables for quantification of platelet function, including the contribution of the adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and thromboxane A2 (TxA2) receptors to clot formation. METHODS: In 43 healthy blood donors, the analytical (CV(a)) and inter-individual variability (CV(g)) of the TEG(® )Platelet Mapping™ assay were determined together with platelet receptor inhibition in response to arachidonic acid (AA) and ADP. RESULTS: The CV(a )of the assay for maximal platelet contribution to clot strength (MA(Thrombin)) was 3.5%, for the fibrin contribution to clot strength (MA(Fibrin)) 5.2%, for MA(AA )4.5% and for MA(ADP )it was 6.6%. The MA(Thrombin )CV(g )was 2.8%, MA(Fibrin )4.7%, MA(AA )6.6% and for MA(ADP )it was 26.2%. Females had a higher MA(Thrombin )compared to males (62.8 vs. 58.4 mm, p = 0.005). The platelet TxA2 receptor inhibition was 1.2% (range 0–10%) and lower than for the ADP receptor (18.6% (0–58%); p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The high variability in ADP receptor inhibition may explain both the differences in response to ADP receptor inhibitor therapy and why major bleeding sometimes develops during surgery in patients not treated with ADP receptor inhibitors. An analytical variation of ~5 % for the TEG(® )enables, however, for routine monitoring of the variability in ADP receptor inhibition and of antiplatelet therapy. BioMed Central 2007-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC1804261/ /pubmed/17311677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-9560-5-3 Text en Copyright © 2007 Bochsen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Clinical Investigation
Bochsen, Louise
Wiinberg, Bo
Kjelgaard-Hansen, Mads
Steinbrüchel, Daniel A
Johansson, Pär I
Evaluation of the TEG(® )platelet mapping™ assay in blood donors
title Evaluation of the TEG(® )platelet mapping™ assay in blood donors
title_full Evaluation of the TEG(® )platelet mapping™ assay in blood donors
title_fullStr Evaluation of the TEG(® )platelet mapping™ assay in blood donors
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the TEG(® )platelet mapping™ assay in blood donors
title_short Evaluation of the TEG(® )platelet mapping™ assay in blood donors
title_sort evaluation of the teg(® )platelet mapping™ assay in blood donors
topic Original Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1804261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17311677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-9560-5-3
work_keys_str_mv AT bochsenlouise evaluationofthetegplateletmappingassayinblooddonors
AT wiinbergbo evaluationofthetegplateletmappingassayinblooddonors
AT kjelgaardhansenmads evaluationofthetegplateletmappingassayinblooddonors
AT steinbrucheldaniela evaluationofthetegplateletmappingassayinblooddonors
AT johanssonpari evaluationofthetegplateletmappingassayinblooddonors