Cargando…
Reliability and validity of a Dutch version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire
BACKGROUND: Chronic cough is a common condition with a significant impact on quality of life. Currently, no health status measure specific for chronic cough exists in the Netherlands. Thus we developed a Dutch version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) and tested its scaling and clinical pro...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1804278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17313670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-9974-3-3 |
_version_ | 1782132450777890816 |
---|---|
author | Huisman, Arnold N Wu, Mei-Zei Uil, Steven M van den Berg, Jan Willem K |
author_facet | Huisman, Arnold N Wu, Mei-Zei Uil, Steven M van den Berg, Jan Willem K |
author_sort | Huisman, Arnold N |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Chronic cough is a common condition with a significant impact on quality of life. Currently, no health status measure specific for chronic cough exists in the Netherlands. Thus we developed a Dutch version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) and tested its scaling and clinical properties. METHODS: The LCQ was adapted for Dutch conditions following a forward-backward translation procedure. All patients referred to our cough clinic between May 2004 and February 2005 completed five questionnaires, the LCQ, the modified Borg score for cough, the Short-Form 36 (SF-36), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Global Rating of Change (GRC) upon presentation, after two weeks and after 6 months. Concurrent validation, internal consistency, repeatability and responsiveness were determined. RESULTS: For the concurrent validation the correlation coefficients (n = 152 patients) between the LCQ and the other outcome measures varied between 0.22 and 0.61. The internal consistency of the LCQ (n = 58) was high for each of the domains with a Crohnbach's alpha coefficient between 0.77 and 0.91. The two week repeatability of the LCQ in patients with no change in cough (n = 48) was high with intraclass correlation coefficients varying between 0.86 and 0.93. Patients who reported an improvement in cough (n = 140) after 6 months demonstrated significant improvement on each of the domains of the LCQ. CONCLUSION: The Dutch version of the LCQ is a valid and reliable questionnaire to measure (changes of) health status in patients with chronic cough. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1804278 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-18042782007-02-24 Reliability and validity of a Dutch version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire Huisman, Arnold N Wu, Mei-Zei Uil, Steven M van den Berg, Jan Willem K Cough Research BACKGROUND: Chronic cough is a common condition with a significant impact on quality of life. Currently, no health status measure specific for chronic cough exists in the Netherlands. Thus we developed a Dutch version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) and tested its scaling and clinical properties. METHODS: The LCQ was adapted for Dutch conditions following a forward-backward translation procedure. All patients referred to our cough clinic between May 2004 and February 2005 completed five questionnaires, the LCQ, the modified Borg score for cough, the Short-Form 36 (SF-36), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Global Rating of Change (GRC) upon presentation, after two weeks and after 6 months. Concurrent validation, internal consistency, repeatability and responsiveness were determined. RESULTS: For the concurrent validation the correlation coefficients (n = 152 patients) between the LCQ and the other outcome measures varied between 0.22 and 0.61. The internal consistency of the LCQ (n = 58) was high for each of the domains with a Crohnbach's alpha coefficient between 0.77 and 0.91. The two week repeatability of the LCQ in patients with no change in cough (n = 48) was high with intraclass correlation coefficients varying between 0.86 and 0.93. Patients who reported an improvement in cough (n = 140) after 6 months demonstrated significant improvement on each of the domains of the LCQ. CONCLUSION: The Dutch version of the LCQ is a valid and reliable questionnaire to measure (changes of) health status in patients with chronic cough. BioMed Central 2007-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC1804278/ /pubmed/17313670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-9974-3-3 Text en Copyright © 2007 Huisman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Huisman, Arnold N Wu, Mei-Zei Uil, Steven M van den Berg, Jan Willem K Reliability and validity of a Dutch version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire |
title | Reliability and validity of a Dutch version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire |
title_full | Reliability and validity of a Dutch version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire |
title_fullStr | Reliability and validity of a Dutch version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and validity of a Dutch version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire |
title_short | Reliability and validity of a Dutch version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire |
title_sort | reliability and validity of a dutch version of the leicester cough questionnaire |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1804278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17313670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-9974-3-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huismanarnoldn reliabilityandvalidityofadutchversionoftheleicestercoughquestionnaire AT wumeizei reliabilityandvalidityofadutchversionoftheleicestercoughquestionnaire AT uilstevenm reliabilityandvalidityofadutchversionoftheleicestercoughquestionnaire AT vandenbergjanwillemk reliabilityandvalidityofadutchversionoftheleicestercoughquestionnaire |