Cargando…

Combined array-comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-loss of heterozygosity analysis reveals complex genetic alterations in cervical cancer

BACKGROUND: Cervical carcinoma develops as a result of multiple genetic alterations. Different studies investigated genomic alterations in cervical cancer mainly by means of metaphase comparative genomic hybridization (mCGH) and microsatellite marker analysis for the detection of loss of heterozygos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kloth, Judith N, Oosting, Jan, van Wezel, Tom, Szuhai, Karoly, Knijnenburg, Jeroen, Gorter, Arko, Kenter, Gemma G, Fleuren, Gert Jan, Jordanova, Ekaterina S
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1805756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17311676
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-8-53
_version_ 1782132492948471808
author Kloth, Judith N
Oosting, Jan
van Wezel, Tom
Szuhai, Karoly
Knijnenburg, Jeroen
Gorter, Arko
Kenter, Gemma G
Fleuren, Gert Jan
Jordanova, Ekaterina S
author_facet Kloth, Judith N
Oosting, Jan
van Wezel, Tom
Szuhai, Karoly
Knijnenburg, Jeroen
Gorter, Arko
Kenter, Gemma G
Fleuren, Gert Jan
Jordanova, Ekaterina S
author_sort Kloth, Judith N
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cervical carcinoma develops as a result of multiple genetic alterations. Different studies investigated genomic alterations in cervical cancer mainly by means of metaphase comparative genomic hybridization (mCGH) and microsatellite marker analysis for the detection of loss of heterozygosity (LOH). Currently, high throughput methods such as array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH), single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP array) and gene expression arrays are available to study genome-wide alterations. Integration of these 3 platforms allows detection of genomic alterations at high resolution and investigation of an association between copy number changes and expression. RESULTS: Genome-wide copy number and genotype analysis of 10 cervical cancer cell lines by array CGH and SNP array showed highly complex large-scale alterations. A comparison between array CGH and SNP array revealed that the overall concordance in detection of the same areas with copy number alterations (CNA) was above 90%. The use of SNP arrays demonstrated that about 75% of LOH events would not have been found by methods which screen for copy number changes, such as array CGH, since these were LOH events without CNA. Regions frequently targeted by CNA, as determined by array CGH, such as amplification of 5p and 20q, and loss of 8p were confirmed by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Genome-wide, we did not find a correlation between copy-number and gene expression. At chromosome arm 5p however, 22% of the genes were significantly upregulated in cell lines with amplifications as compared to cell lines without amplifications, as measured by gene expression arrays. For 3 genes, SKP2, ANKH and TRIO, expression differences were confirmed by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). CONCLUSION: This study showed that copy number data retrieved from either array CGH or SNP array are comparable and that the integration of genome-wide LOH, copy number and gene expression is useful for the identification of gene specific targets that could be relevant for the development and progression in cervical cancer.
format Text
id pubmed-1805756
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18057562007-03-01 Combined array-comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-loss of heterozygosity analysis reveals complex genetic alterations in cervical cancer Kloth, Judith N Oosting, Jan van Wezel, Tom Szuhai, Karoly Knijnenburg, Jeroen Gorter, Arko Kenter, Gemma G Fleuren, Gert Jan Jordanova, Ekaterina S BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Cervical carcinoma develops as a result of multiple genetic alterations. Different studies investigated genomic alterations in cervical cancer mainly by means of metaphase comparative genomic hybridization (mCGH) and microsatellite marker analysis for the detection of loss of heterozygosity (LOH). Currently, high throughput methods such as array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH), single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP array) and gene expression arrays are available to study genome-wide alterations. Integration of these 3 platforms allows detection of genomic alterations at high resolution and investigation of an association between copy number changes and expression. RESULTS: Genome-wide copy number and genotype analysis of 10 cervical cancer cell lines by array CGH and SNP array showed highly complex large-scale alterations. A comparison between array CGH and SNP array revealed that the overall concordance in detection of the same areas with copy number alterations (CNA) was above 90%. The use of SNP arrays demonstrated that about 75% of LOH events would not have been found by methods which screen for copy number changes, such as array CGH, since these were LOH events without CNA. Regions frequently targeted by CNA, as determined by array CGH, such as amplification of 5p and 20q, and loss of 8p were confirmed by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Genome-wide, we did not find a correlation between copy-number and gene expression. At chromosome arm 5p however, 22% of the genes were significantly upregulated in cell lines with amplifications as compared to cell lines without amplifications, as measured by gene expression arrays. For 3 genes, SKP2, ANKH and TRIO, expression differences were confirmed by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). CONCLUSION: This study showed that copy number data retrieved from either array CGH or SNP array are comparable and that the integration of genome-wide LOH, copy number and gene expression is useful for the identification of gene specific targets that could be relevant for the development and progression in cervical cancer. BioMed Central 2007-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC1805756/ /pubmed/17311676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-8-53 Text en Copyright © 2007 Kloth et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kloth, Judith N
Oosting, Jan
van Wezel, Tom
Szuhai, Karoly
Knijnenburg, Jeroen
Gorter, Arko
Kenter, Gemma G
Fleuren, Gert Jan
Jordanova, Ekaterina S
Combined array-comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-loss of heterozygosity analysis reveals complex genetic alterations in cervical cancer
title Combined array-comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-loss of heterozygosity analysis reveals complex genetic alterations in cervical cancer
title_full Combined array-comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-loss of heterozygosity analysis reveals complex genetic alterations in cervical cancer
title_fullStr Combined array-comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-loss of heterozygosity analysis reveals complex genetic alterations in cervical cancer
title_full_unstemmed Combined array-comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-loss of heterozygosity analysis reveals complex genetic alterations in cervical cancer
title_short Combined array-comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-loss of heterozygosity analysis reveals complex genetic alterations in cervical cancer
title_sort combined array-comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-loss of heterozygosity analysis reveals complex genetic alterations in cervical cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1805756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17311676
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-8-53
work_keys_str_mv AT klothjudithn combinedarraycomparativegenomichybridizationandsinglenucleotidepolymorphismlossofheterozygosityanalysisrevealscomplexgeneticalterationsincervicalcancer
AT oostingjan combinedarraycomparativegenomichybridizationandsinglenucleotidepolymorphismlossofheterozygosityanalysisrevealscomplexgeneticalterationsincervicalcancer
AT vanwezeltom combinedarraycomparativegenomichybridizationandsinglenucleotidepolymorphismlossofheterozygosityanalysisrevealscomplexgeneticalterationsincervicalcancer
AT szuhaikaroly combinedarraycomparativegenomichybridizationandsinglenucleotidepolymorphismlossofheterozygosityanalysisrevealscomplexgeneticalterationsincervicalcancer
AT knijnenburgjeroen combinedarraycomparativegenomichybridizationandsinglenucleotidepolymorphismlossofheterozygosityanalysisrevealscomplexgeneticalterationsincervicalcancer
AT gorterarko combinedarraycomparativegenomichybridizationandsinglenucleotidepolymorphismlossofheterozygosityanalysisrevealscomplexgeneticalterationsincervicalcancer
AT kentergemmag combinedarraycomparativegenomichybridizationandsinglenucleotidepolymorphismlossofheterozygosityanalysisrevealscomplexgeneticalterationsincervicalcancer
AT fleurengertjan combinedarraycomparativegenomichybridizationandsinglenucleotidepolymorphismlossofheterozygosityanalysisrevealscomplexgeneticalterationsincervicalcancer
AT jordanovaekaterinas combinedarraycomparativegenomichybridizationandsinglenucleotidepolymorphismlossofheterozygosityanalysisrevealscomplexgeneticalterationsincervicalcancer