Cargando…

Control of the yeast telomeric senescence survival pathways of recombination by the Mec1 and Mec3 DNA damage sensors and RPA

Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomerase-negative cells undergo homologous recombination on subtelomeric or TG(1–3) telomeric sequences, thus allowing Type I or Type II post-senescence survival, respectively. Here, we find that the DNA damage sensors, Mec1, Mec3 and Rad24 control Type II recombination, w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grandin, Nathalie, Charbonneau, Michel
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1807969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17202155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl1081
_version_ 1782132507359051776
author Grandin, Nathalie
Charbonneau, Michel
author_facet Grandin, Nathalie
Charbonneau, Michel
author_sort Grandin, Nathalie
collection PubMed
description Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomerase-negative cells undergo homologous recombination on subtelomeric or TG(1–3) telomeric sequences, thus allowing Type I or Type II post-senescence survival, respectively. Here, we find that the DNA damage sensors, Mec1, Mec3 and Rad24 control Type II recombination, while the Rad9 adaptor protein and the Rad53 and Chk1 effector kinases have no effect on survivor type selection. Therefore, the Mec1 and Mec3 checkpoint complexes control telomeric recombination independently of their roles in generating and amplifying the Mec1-Rad53-Chk1 kinase cascade. rfa1-t11 mutant cells, bearing a mutation in Replication Protein A (RPA) conferring a defect in recruiting Mec1-Ddc2, were also deficient in both types of telomeric recombination. Importantly, expression of an Rfa1-t11-Ddc2 hybrid fusion protein restored checkpoint-dependent arrest, but did not rescue defective telomeric recombination. Therefore, the Rfa1-t11-associated defect in telomeric recombination is not solely due to its failure to recruit Mec1. We have also isolated novel alleles of RFA1 that were deficient in Type I but not in Type II recombination and proficient in checkpoint control. Therefore, the checkpoint and recombination functions of RPA can be genetically separated, as can the RPA-mediated control of the two types of telomeric recombination.
format Text
id pubmed-1807969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18079692007-03-02 Control of the yeast telomeric senescence survival pathways of recombination by the Mec1 and Mec3 DNA damage sensors and RPA Grandin, Nathalie Charbonneau, Michel Nucleic Acids Res Molecular Biology Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomerase-negative cells undergo homologous recombination on subtelomeric or TG(1–3) telomeric sequences, thus allowing Type I or Type II post-senescence survival, respectively. Here, we find that the DNA damage sensors, Mec1, Mec3 and Rad24 control Type II recombination, while the Rad9 adaptor protein and the Rad53 and Chk1 effector kinases have no effect on survivor type selection. Therefore, the Mec1 and Mec3 checkpoint complexes control telomeric recombination independently of their roles in generating and amplifying the Mec1-Rad53-Chk1 kinase cascade. rfa1-t11 mutant cells, bearing a mutation in Replication Protein A (RPA) conferring a defect in recruiting Mec1-Ddc2, were also deficient in both types of telomeric recombination. Importantly, expression of an Rfa1-t11-Ddc2 hybrid fusion protein restored checkpoint-dependent arrest, but did not rescue defective telomeric recombination. Therefore, the Rfa1-t11-associated defect in telomeric recombination is not solely due to its failure to recruit Mec1. We have also isolated novel alleles of RFA1 that were deficient in Type I but not in Type II recombination and proficient in checkpoint control. Therefore, the checkpoint and recombination functions of RPA can be genetically separated, as can the RPA-mediated control of the two types of telomeric recombination. Oxford University Press 2007-02 2007-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC1807969/ /pubmed/17202155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl1081 Text en © 2006 The Author(s) This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Molecular Biology
Grandin, Nathalie
Charbonneau, Michel
Control of the yeast telomeric senescence survival pathways of recombination by the Mec1 and Mec3 DNA damage sensors and RPA
title Control of the yeast telomeric senescence survival pathways of recombination by the Mec1 and Mec3 DNA damage sensors and RPA
title_full Control of the yeast telomeric senescence survival pathways of recombination by the Mec1 and Mec3 DNA damage sensors and RPA
title_fullStr Control of the yeast telomeric senescence survival pathways of recombination by the Mec1 and Mec3 DNA damage sensors and RPA
title_full_unstemmed Control of the yeast telomeric senescence survival pathways of recombination by the Mec1 and Mec3 DNA damage sensors and RPA
title_short Control of the yeast telomeric senescence survival pathways of recombination by the Mec1 and Mec3 DNA damage sensors and RPA
title_sort control of the yeast telomeric senescence survival pathways of recombination by the mec1 and mec3 dna damage sensors and rpa
topic Molecular Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1807969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17202155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl1081
work_keys_str_mv AT grandinnathalie controloftheyeasttelomericsenescencesurvivalpathwaysofrecombinationbythemec1andmec3dnadamagesensorsandrpa
AT charbonneaumichel controloftheyeasttelomericsenescencesurvivalpathwaysofrecombinationbythemec1andmec3dnadamagesensorsandrpa