Cargando…
When Should Potentially False Research Findings Be Considered Acceptable?
Ioannidis estimated that most published research findings are false [1], but he did not indicate when, if at all, potentially false research results may be considered as acceptable to society. We combined our two previously published models [2,3] to calculate the probability above which research fin...
Autores principales: | Djulbegovic, Benjamin, Hozo, Iztok |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1808081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17326703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040026 |
Ejemplares similares
-
When is it rational to participate in a clinical trial? A game theory approach incorporating trust, regret and guilt
por: Djulbegovic, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Effect of Initial Conditions on Reproducibility of Scientific Research
por: Djulbegovic, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
por: Ioannidis, John P. A.
Publicado: (2005) -
Expected utility versus expected regret theory versions of decision curve analysis do generate different results when treatment effects are taken into account
por: Hozo, Iztok, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Most Published Research Findings Are False—But a Little Replication Goes a Long Way
por: Moonesinghe, Ramal, et al.
Publicado: (2007)