Cargando…
Most Published Research Findings Are False—But a Little Replication Goes a Long Way
While the authors agree with John Ioannidis that "most research findings are false," here they show that replication of research findings enhances the positive predictive value of research findings being true.
Autores principales: | Moonesinghe, Ramal, Khoury, Muin J, Janssens, A. Cecile J. W |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1808082/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17326704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040028 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
por: Ioannidis, John P. A.
Publicado: (2005) -
Predictive genetic testing for the identification of high-risk groups: a simulation study on the impact of predictive ability
por: Mihaescu, Raluca, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Sample size requirements to detect the effect of a group of genetic variants in case-control studies
por: Moonesinghe, Ramal, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
Bach Goes to Town †
por: Christensen, Jørn Bolstad
Publicado: (2018) -
A little Rac goes a long way
por: Tuma, Rabiya S.
Publicado: (2005)