Cargando…

Explicit attention interferes with selective emotion processing in human extrastriate cortex

BACKGROUND: Brain imaging and event-related potential studies provide strong evidence that emotional stimuli guide selective attention in visual processing. A reflection of the emotional attention capture is the increased Early Posterior Negativity (EPN) for pleasant and unpleasant compared to neutr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schupp, Harald T, Stockburger, Jessica, Bublatzky, Florian, Junghöfer, Markus, Weike, Almut I, Hamm, Alfons O
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1808466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17316444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-8-16
_version_ 1782132541508026368
author Schupp, Harald T
Stockburger, Jessica
Bublatzky, Florian
Junghöfer, Markus
Weike, Almut I
Hamm, Alfons O
author_facet Schupp, Harald T
Stockburger, Jessica
Bublatzky, Florian
Junghöfer, Markus
Weike, Almut I
Hamm, Alfons O
author_sort Schupp, Harald T
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Brain imaging and event-related potential studies provide strong evidence that emotional stimuli guide selective attention in visual processing. A reflection of the emotional attention capture is the increased Early Posterior Negativity (EPN) for pleasant and unpleasant compared to neutral images (~150–300 ms poststimulus). The present study explored whether this early emotion discrimination reflects an automatic phenomenon or is subject to interference by competing processing demands. Thus, emotional processing was assessed while participants performed a concurrent feature-based attention task varying in processing demands. RESULTS: Participants successfully performed the primary visual attention task as revealed by behavioral performance and selected event-related potential components (Selection Negativity and P3b). Replicating previous results, emotional modulation of the EPN was observed in a task condition with low processing demands. In contrast, pleasant and unpleasant pictures failed to elicit increased EPN amplitudes compared to neutral images in more difficult explicit attention task conditions. Further analyses determined that even the processing of pleasant and unpleasant pictures high in emotional arousal is subject to interference in experimental conditions with high task demand. Taken together, performing demanding feature-based counting tasks interfered with differential emotion processing indexed by the EPN. CONCLUSION: The present findings demonstrate that taxing processing resources by a competing primary visual attention task markedly attenuated the early discrimination of emotional from neutral picture contents. Thus, these results provide further empirical support for an interference account of the emotion-attention interaction under conditions of competition. Previous studies revealed the interference of selective emotion processing when attentional resources were directed to locations of explicitly task-relevant stimuli. The present data suggest that interference of emotion processing by competing task demands is a more general phenomenon extending to the domain of feature-based attention. Furthermore, the results are inconsistent with the notion of effortlessness, i.e., early emotion discrimination despite concurrent task demands. These findings implicate to assess the presumed automatic nature of emotion processing at the level of specific aspects rather than considering automaticity as an all-or-none phenomenon.
format Text
id pubmed-1808466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18084662007-03-03 Explicit attention interferes with selective emotion processing in human extrastriate cortex Schupp, Harald T Stockburger, Jessica Bublatzky, Florian Junghöfer, Markus Weike, Almut I Hamm, Alfons O BMC Neurosci Research Article BACKGROUND: Brain imaging and event-related potential studies provide strong evidence that emotional stimuli guide selective attention in visual processing. A reflection of the emotional attention capture is the increased Early Posterior Negativity (EPN) for pleasant and unpleasant compared to neutral images (~150–300 ms poststimulus). The present study explored whether this early emotion discrimination reflects an automatic phenomenon or is subject to interference by competing processing demands. Thus, emotional processing was assessed while participants performed a concurrent feature-based attention task varying in processing demands. RESULTS: Participants successfully performed the primary visual attention task as revealed by behavioral performance and selected event-related potential components (Selection Negativity and P3b). Replicating previous results, emotional modulation of the EPN was observed in a task condition with low processing demands. In contrast, pleasant and unpleasant pictures failed to elicit increased EPN amplitudes compared to neutral images in more difficult explicit attention task conditions. Further analyses determined that even the processing of pleasant and unpleasant pictures high in emotional arousal is subject to interference in experimental conditions with high task demand. Taken together, performing demanding feature-based counting tasks interfered with differential emotion processing indexed by the EPN. CONCLUSION: The present findings demonstrate that taxing processing resources by a competing primary visual attention task markedly attenuated the early discrimination of emotional from neutral picture contents. Thus, these results provide further empirical support for an interference account of the emotion-attention interaction under conditions of competition. Previous studies revealed the interference of selective emotion processing when attentional resources were directed to locations of explicitly task-relevant stimuli. The present data suggest that interference of emotion processing by competing task demands is a more general phenomenon extending to the domain of feature-based attention. Furthermore, the results are inconsistent with the notion of effortlessness, i.e., early emotion discrimination despite concurrent task demands. These findings implicate to assess the presumed automatic nature of emotion processing at the level of specific aspects rather than considering automaticity as an all-or-none phenomenon. BioMed Central 2007-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC1808466/ /pubmed/17316444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-8-16 Text en Copyright © 2007 Schupp et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schupp, Harald T
Stockburger, Jessica
Bublatzky, Florian
Junghöfer, Markus
Weike, Almut I
Hamm, Alfons O
Explicit attention interferes with selective emotion processing in human extrastriate cortex
title Explicit attention interferes with selective emotion processing in human extrastriate cortex
title_full Explicit attention interferes with selective emotion processing in human extrastriate cortex
title_fullStr Explicit attention interferes with selective emotion processing in human extrastriate cortex
title_full_unstemmed Explicit attention interferes with selective emotion processing in human extrastriate cortex
title_short Explicit attention interferes with selective emotion processing in human extrastriate cortex
title_sort explicit attention interferes with selective emotion processing in human extrastriate cortex
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1808466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17316444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-8-16
work_keys_str_mv AT schuppharaldt explicitattentioninterfereswithselectiveemotionprocessinginhumanextrastriatecortex
AT stockburgerjessica explicitattentioninterfereswithselectiveemotionprocessinginhumanextrastriatecortex
AT bublatzkyflorian explicitattentioninterfereswithselectiveemotionprocessinginhumanextrastriatecortex
AT junghofermarkus explicitattentioninterfereswithselectiveemotionprocessinginhumanextrastriatecortex
AT weikealmuti explicitattentioninterfereswithselectiveemotionprocessinginhumanextrastriatecortex
AT hammalfonso explicitattentioninterfereswithselectiveemotionprocessinginhumanextrastriatecortex