Cargando…

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to develop an instrument to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews, building upon previous tools, empirical evidence and expert consensus. METHODS: A 37-item assessment tool was formed by combining 1) the enhanced Overview Quality Assessment Questionnai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Shea, Beverley J, Grimshaw, Jeremy M, Wells, George A, Boers, Maarten, Andersson, Neil, Hamel, Candyce, Porter, Ashley C, Tugwell, Peter, Moher, David, Bouter, Lex M
Formato:	Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2007
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1810543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17302989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-10

Ejemplares similares

Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
por: Shea, Beverley, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)
por: Shea, Beverley J., et al.
Publicado: (2007)

AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
por: Shea, Beverley J, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR
por: Dosenovic, Svjetlana, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-Analysis Studies in Dance Therapy Using AMSTAR and AMSTAR 2
por: Kim, Hye-Ryeon, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Use of AMSTAR-2 in the methodological assessment of systematic reviews: protocol for a methodological study
por: Lu, Cuncun, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Quality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: an exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines
por: Kelly, Shannon E, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
por: Pollock, Michelle, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Evaluation of the reliability, usability, and applicability of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS: protocol for a descriptive analytic study
por: Gates, Allison, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Evaluating Breast Reconstruction Reviews Using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)
por: Yuan, Morgan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

157: ASSESSING THE METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY OF DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM (DSS) SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS BY AMSTAR CHECKLIST
por: Sadeghi-Ghyassi, Fatemeh, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Limitations of A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and suggestions for improvement
por: Burda, Brittany U., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Methodological quality of meta-analyses on treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cross-sectional study using the AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews) tool
por: Ho, Robin ST, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Adopting AMSTAR 2 critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews: speed of the tool uptake and barriers for its adoption
por: Bojcic, Ruzica, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Critical appraisal of systematic reviews of intervention studies in periodontology using AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS tools
por: Pereira, Alexandre-Godinho, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Inter-rater reliability of AMSTAR is dependent on the pair of reviewers
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

An AMSTAR assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of oral healthcare interventions published in the Journal of Applied Oral Science (JAOS)
por: SEQUEIRA-BYRON, Patrick, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Reporting and methodologic evaluation of meta-analyses published in the anesthesia literature according to AMSTAR and PRISMA checklists: a preliminary study
por: Oh, Jae Hoon, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Incorporating equity, diversity, and inclusiveness into the Hong Kong Principles
por: Moher, David, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A comparison of two assessment tools used in overviews of systematic reviews: ROBIS versus AMSTAR-2
por: Perry, R., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Reduction of inequalities in health: assessing evidence-based tools
por: Tugwell, Peter, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Evaluating the Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses About Breast Augmentation Using AMSTAR
por: Yuan, Morgan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Resuming the discussion of AMSTAR: What can (should) be made better?
por: Wegewitz, Uta, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

How is AMSTAR applied by authors – a call for better reporting
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of antidepressants effect on low back pain using updated AMSTAR
por: Panahi, Mohammad Hossein, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews/meta-analyses of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome using AMSTAR2
por: Guan, Xin, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

An overview of systematic reviews of complementary and alternative therapies for fibromyalgia using both AMSTAR and ROBIS as quality assessment tools
por: Perry, Rachel, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The methodological quality of systematic reviews on the treatment of adult major depression needs improvement according to AMSTAR 2: A cross-sectional study
por: Matthias, Katja, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews
por: Kang, Deying, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Can AMSTAR also be applied to systematic reviews of non-randomized studies?
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Reproductive and sexual health in the Maldives: analysis of data from two cross-sectional surveys
por: Cockcroft, Anne, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Critical appraisal of AMSTAR: challenges, limitations, and potential solutions from the perspective of an assessor
por: Faggion, Clovis Mariano
Publicado: (2015)

Editorial Perspective: Time for Another Grading System—From PRISMA to AMSTAR 2
por: Chapman, Jens R.
Publicado: (2020)

The methodological quality of 176,620 randomized controlled trials published between 1966 and 2018 reveals a positive trend but also an urgent need for improvement
por: Vinkers, Christiaan H., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Abstract: Assessing Quality in Systematic Reviews: Application of AMSTAR Criteria to Plastic Surgery Literature
por: Jenny, Hillary E., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Quality assessment of systematic reviews on total hip or knee arthroplasty using mod-AMSTAR
por: Wu, Xinyu, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Household cost-benefit equations and sustainable universal childhood immunisation: a randomised cluster controlled trial in south Pakistan [ISRCTN12421731]
por: Andersson, Neil, et al.
Publicado: (2005)

Different Approaches to Appraising Systematic Reviews of Digital Interventions for Physical Activity Promotion Using AMSTAR 2 Tool: Cross-Sectional Study
por: De Santis, Karina Karolina, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

What editors, reviewers, researchers and librarians need to know about the PRESS, MECIR, PRISMA and AMSTAR instruments with regard to improving the methodological quality of searches for information for articles
por: Puga, Maria Eduarda dos Santos
Publicado: (2020)

Commentary on: Evaluating the Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses About Breast Augmentation Using AMSTAR
por: Gould, Daniel J
Publicado: (2021)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_kie91e0kc0c2dnb42e166lrm95