Cargando…

Air Travel and Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT: Despite multiple attempts to document and quantify the danger of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following prolonged travel, there is still uncertainty about the magnitude of risk and what can be done to lower it. OBJECTIVES: To review the methodologic strength of the literature, estimate the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Philbrick, John T., Shumate, Rebecca, Siadaty, Mir S., Becker, Daniel M.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1824715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17351849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-006-0016-0
_version_ 1782132690624970752
author Philbrick, John T.
Shumate, Rebecca
Siadaty, Mir S.
Becker, Daniel M.
author_facet Philbrick, John T.
Shumate, Rebecca
Siadaty, Mir S.
Becker, Daniel M.
author_sort Philbrick, John T.
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Despite multiple attempts to document and quantify the danger of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following prolonged travel, there is still uncertainty about the magnitude of risk and what can be done to lower it. OBJECTIVES: To review the methodologic strength of the literature, estimate the risk of travel-related VTE, evaluate the efficacy of preventive treatments, and develop evidence-based recommendations for practice. DATA SOURCES: Studies identified from MEDLINE from 1966 through December 2005, supplemented by a review of the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and relevant bibliographies. STUDY SELECTION: We included all clinical studies that either reported primary data concerning travel as a risk factor for VTE or tested preventive measures for travel-related VTE. DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers reviewed each study independently to assess inclusion criteria, classify research design, and rate methodologic features. The effect of methodologic differences, VTE risk, and travel duration on VTE rate was evaluated using a logistic regression model. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-four published reports, totaling 25 studies, met inclusion criteria (6 case-control studies, 10 cohort studies, and 9 randomized controlled trials). Method of screening for VTE [screening ultrasound compared to usual clinical care, odds ratio (OR) 390], outcome measure [all VTE compared to pulmonary embolism (PE) only, OR 21], duration of travel (<6 hours compared to 6–8 hours, OR 0.011), and clinical risk (“higher” risk travelers compared to “lower,” OR 3.6) were significantly related to VTE rate. Clinical VTE after prolonged travel is rare [27 PE per million flights diagnosed through usual clinical care, 0.05% symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed through screening ultrasounds], but asymptomatic thrombi of uncertain clinical significance are more common. Graduated compression stockings prevented travel-related VTE (P < 0.05 in 4 of 6 studies), aspirin did not, and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) showed a trend toward efficacy in one study. CONCLUSIONS: All travelers, regardless of VTE risk, should avoid dehydration and frequently exercise leg muscles. Travelers on a flight of less than 6 hours and those with no known risk factors for VTE, regardless of the duration of the flight, do not need DVT prophylaxis. Travelers with 1 or more risk factors for VTE should consider graduated compression stockings and/or LMWH for flights longer than 6 hours.
format Text
id pubmed-1824715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18247152007-03-15 Air Travel and Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review Philbrick, John T. Shumate, Rebecca Siadaty, Mir S. Becker, Daniel M. J Gen Intern Med Original Article CONTEXT: Despite multiple attempts to document and quantify the danger of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following prolonged travel, there is still uncertainty about the magnitude of risk and what can be done to lower it. OBJECTIVES: To review the methodologic strength of the literature, estimate the risk of travel-related VTE, evaluate the efficacy of preventive treatments, and develop evidence-based recommendations for practice. DATA SOURCES: Studies identified from MEDLINE from 1966 through December 2005, supplemented by a review of the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and relevant bibliographies. STUDY SELECTION: We included all clinical studies that either reported primary data concerning travel as a risk factor for VTE or tested preventive measures for travel-related VTE. DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers reviewed each study independently to assess inclusion criteria, classify research design, and rate methodologic features. The effect of methodologic differences, VTE risk, and travel duration on VTE rate was evaluated using a logistic regression model. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-four published reports, totaling 25 studies, met inclusion criteria (6 case-control studies, 10 cohort studies, and 9 randomized controlled trials). Method of screening for VTE [screening ultrasound compared to usual clinical care, odds ratio (OR) 390], outcome measure [all VTE compared to pulmonary embolism (PE) only, OR 21], duration of travel (<6 hours compared to 6–8 hours, OR 0.011), and clinical risk (“higher” risk travelers compared to “lower,” OR 3.6) were significantly related to VTE rate. Clinical VTE after prolonged travel is rare [27 PE per million flights diagnosed through usual clinical care, 0.05% symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed through screening ultrasounds], but asymptomatic thrombi of uncertain clinical significance are more common. Graduated compression stockings prevented travel-related VTE (P < 0.05 in 4 of 6 studies), aspirin did not, and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) showed a trend toward efficacy in one study. CONCLUSIONS: All travelers, regardless of VTE risk, should avoid dehydration and frequently exercise leg muscles. Travelers on a flight of less than 6 hours and those with no known risk factors for VTE, regardless of the duration of the flight, do not need DVT prophylaxis. Travelers with 1 or more risk factors for VTE should consider graduated compression stockings and/or LMWH for flights longer than 6 hours. Springer-Verlag 2007-01-17 2007-01 /pmc/articles/PMC1824715/ /pubmed/17351849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-006-0016-0 Text en © Society of General Internal Medicine 2007
spellingShingle Original Article
Philbrick, John T.
Shumate, Rebecca
Siadaty, Mir S.
Becker, Daniel M.
Air Travel and Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review
title Air Travel and Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review
title_full Air Travel and Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Air Travel and Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Air Travel and Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review
title_short Air Travel and Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review
title_sort air travel and venous thromboembolism: a systematic review
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1824715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17351849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-006-0016-0
work_keys_str_mv AT philbrickjohnt airtravelandvenousthromboembolismasystematicreview
AT shumaterebecca airtravelandvenousthromboembolismasystematicreview
AT siadatymirs airtravelandvenousthromboembolismasystematicreview
AT beckerdanielm airtravelandvenousthromboembolismasystematicreview