Cargando…

Improving Osteoporosis Screening: Results from a Randomized Cluster Trial

BACKGROUND: Despite recommendations, osteoporosis screening rates among women aged 65 years and older remain low. We present results from a clustered, randomized trial evaluating patient mailed reminders, alone and in combination with physician prompts, to improve osteoporosis screening and treatmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lafata, Jennifer Elston, Kolk, Deneil, Peterson, Edward L., McCarthy, Bruce D., Weiss, Thomas W., Chen, Ya-Ting, Muma, Bruce K.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1824751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17356966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-006-0060-9
_version_ 1782132700953444352
author Lafata, Jennifer Elston
Kolk, Deneil
Peterson, Edward L.
McCarthy, Bruce D.
Weiss, Thomas W.
Chen, Ya-Ting
Muma, Bruce K.
author_facet Lafata, Jennifer Elston
Kolk, Deneil
Peterson, Edward L.
McCarthy, Bruce D.
Weiss, Thomas W.
Chen, Ya-Ting
Muma, Bruce K.
author_sort Lafata, Jennifer Elston
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite recommendations, osteoporosis screening rates among women aged 65 years and older remain low. We present results from a clustered, randomized trial evaluating patient mailed reminders, alone and in combination with physician prompts, to improve osteoporosis screening and treatment. METHODS: Primary care clinics (n = 15) were randomized to usual care, mailed reminders alone, or mailed reminders with physician prompts. Study patients were females aged 65–89 years (N = 10,354). Using automated clinical and pharmacy data, information was collected on bone mineral density testing, pharmacy dispensings, and other patient characteristics. Unadjusted/adjusted differences in testing and treatment were assessed using generalized estimating equation approaches. RESULTS: Osteoporosis screening rates were 10.8% in usual care, 24.1% in mailed reminder, and 28.9% in mailed reminder with physician prompt. Results adjusted for differences at baseline indicated that mailed reminders significantly improved testing rates compared to usual care, and that the addition of prompts further improved testing. This effect increased with patient age. Treatment rates were 5.2% in usual care, 8.4% in mailed reminders, and 9.1% in mailed reminders with prompt. No significant differences were found in treatment rates between those receiving mailed reminders alone or in combination with physician prompts. However, women receiving usual care were significantly less likely to be treated. CONCLUSIONS: The use of mailed reminders, either alone or with physician prompts, can significantly improve osteoporosis screening and treatment rates among insured primary care patients (Clinical Trials.gov number NCT00139425).
format Text
id pubmed-1824751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18247512008-03-01 Improving Osteoporosis Screening: Results from a Randomized Cluster Trial Lafata, Jennifer Elston Kolk, Deneil Peterson, Edward L. McCarthy, Bruce D. Weiss, Thomas W. Chen, Ya-Ting Muma, Bruce K. J Gen Intern Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Despite recommendations, osteoporosis screening rates among women aged 65 years and older remain low. We present results from a clustered, randomized trial evaluating patient mailed reminders, alone and in combination with physician prompts, to improve osteoporosis screening and treatment. METHODS: Primary care clinics (n = 15) were randomized to usual care, mailed reminders alone, or mailed reminders with physician prompts. Study patients were females aged 65–89 years (N = 10,354). Using automated clinical and pharmacy data, information was collected on bone mineral density testing, pharmacy dispensings, and other patient characteristics. Unadjusted/adjusted differences in testing and treatment were assessed using generalized estimating equation approaches. RESULTS: Osteoporosis screening rates were 10.8% in usual care, 24.1% in mailed reminder, and 28.9% in mailed reminder with physician prompt. Results adjusted for differences at baseline indicated that mailed reminders significantly improved testing rates compared to usual care, and that the addition of prompts further improved testing. This effect increased with patient age. Treatment rates were 5.2% in usual care, 8.4% in mailed reminders, and 9.1% in mailed reminders with prompt. No significant differences were found in treatment rates between those receiving mailed reminders alone or in combination with physician prompts. However, women receiving usual care were significantly less likely to be treated. CONCLUSIONS: The use of mailed reminders, either alone or with physician prompts, can significantly improve osteoporosis screening and treatment rates among insured primary care patients (Clinical Trials.gov number NCT00139425). Springer-Verlag 2007-01-13 2007-03 /pmc/articles/PMC1824751/ /pubmed/17356966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-006-0060-9 Text en © Society of General Internal Medicine 2007
spellingShingle Original Article
Lafata, Jennifer Elston
Kolk, Deneil
Peterson, Edward L.
McCarthy, Bruce D.
Weiss, Thomas W.
Chen, Ya-Ting
Muma, Bruce K.
Improving Osteoporosis Screening: Results from a Randomized Cluster Trial
title Improving Osteoporosis Screening: Results from a Randomized Cluster Trial
title_full Improving Osteoporosis Screening: Results from a Randomized Cluster Trial
title_fullStr Improving Osteoporosis Screening: Results from a Randomized Cluster Trial
title_full_unstemmed Improving Osteoporosis Screening: Results from a Randomized Cluster Trial
title_short Improving Osteoporosis Screening: Results from a Randomized Cluster Trial
title_sort improving osteoporosis screening: results from a randomized cluster trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1824751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17356966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-006-0060-9
work_keys_str_mv AT lafatajenniferelston improvingosteoporosisscreeningresultsfromarandomizedclustertrial
AT kolkdeneil improvingosteoporosisscreeningresultsfromarandomizedclustertrial
AT petersonedwardl improvingosteoporosisscreeningresultsfromarandomizedclustertrial
AT mccarthybruced improvingosteoporosisscreeningresultsfromarandomizedclustertrial
AT weissthomasw improvingosteoporosisscreeningresultsfromarandomizedclustertrial
AT chenyating improvingosteoporosisscreeningresultsfromarandomizedclustertrial
AT mumabrucek improvingosteoporosisscreeningresultsfromarandomizedclustertrial