Cargando…
Improving Osteoporosis Screening: Results from a Randomized Cluster Trial
BACKGROUND: Despite recommendations, osteoporosis screening rates among women aged 65 years and older remain low. We present results from a clustered, randomized trial evaluating patient mailed reminders, alone and in combination with physician prompts, to improve osteoporosis screening and treatmen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1824751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17356966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-006-0060-9 |
_version_ | 1782132700953444352 |
---|---|
author | Lafata, Jennifer Elston Kolk, Deneil Peterson, Edward L. McCarthy, Bruce D. Weiss, Thomas W. Chen, Ya-Ting Muma, Bruce K. |
author_facet | Lafata, Jennifer Elston Kolk, Deneil Peterson, Edward L. McCarthy, Bruce D. Weiss, Thomas W. Chen, Ya-Ting Muma, Bruce K. |
author_sort | Lafata, Jennifer Elston |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite recommendations, osteoporosis screening rates among women aged 65 years and older remain low. We present results from a clustered, randomized trial evaluating patient mailed reminders, alone and in combination with physician prompts, to improve osteoporosis screening and treatment. METHODS: Primary care clinics (n = 15) were randomized to usual care, mailed reminders alone, or mailed reminders with physician prompts. Study patients were females aged 65–89 years (N = 10,354). Using automated clinical and pharmacy data, information was collected on bone mineral density testing, pharmacy dispensings, and other patient characteristics. Unadjusted/adjusted differences in testing and treatment were assessed using generalized estimating equation approaches. RESULTS: Osteoporosis screening rates were 10.8% in usual care, 24.1% in mailed reminder, and 28.9% in mailed reminder with physician prompt. Results adjusted for differences at baseline indicated that mailed reminders significantly improved testing rates compared to usual care, and that the addition of prompts further improved testing. This effect increased with patient age. Treatment rates were 5.2% in usual care, 8.4% in mailed reminders, and 9.1% in mailed reminders with prompt. No significant differences were found in treatment rates between those receiving mailed reminders alone or in combination with physician prompts. However, women receiving usual care were significantly less likely to be treated. CONCLUSIONS: The use of mailed reminders, either alone or with physician prompts, can significantly improve osteoporosis screening and treatment rates among insured primary care patients (Clinical Trials.gov number NCT00139425). |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1824751 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-18247512008-03-01 Improving Osteoporosis Screening: Results from a Randomized Cluster Trial Lafata, Jennifer Elston Kolk, Deneil Peterson, Edward L. McCarthy, Bruce D. Weiss, Thomas W. Chen, Ya-Ting Muma, Bruce K. J Gen Intern Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Despite recommendations, osteoporosis screening rates among women aged 65 years and older remain low. We present results from a clustered, randomized trial evaluating patient mailed reminders, alone and in combination with physician prompts, to improve osteoporosis screening and treatment. METHODS: Primary care clinics (n = 15) were randomized to usual care, mailed reminders alone, or mailed reminders with physician prompts. Study patients were females aged 65–89 years (N = 10,354). Using automated clinical and pharmacy data, information was collected on bone mineral density testing, pharmacy dispensings, and other patient characteristics. Unadjusted/adjusted differences in testing and treatment were assessed using generalized estimating equation approaches. RESULTS: Osteoporosis screening rates were 10.8% in usual care, 24.1% in mailed reminder, and 28.9% in mailed reminder with physician prompt. Results adjusted for differences at baseline indicated that mailed reminders significantly improved testing rates compared to usual care, and that the addition of prompts further improved testing. This effect increased with patient age. Treatment rates were 5.2% in usual care, 8.4% in mailed reminders, and 9.1% in mailed reminders with prompt. No significant differences were found in treatment rates between those receiving mailed reminders alone or in combination with physician prompts. However, women receiving usual care were significantly less likely to be treated. CONCLUSIONS: The use of mailed reminders, either alone or with physician prompts, can significantly improve osteoporosis screening and treatment rates among insured primary care patients (Clinical Trials.gov number NCT00139425). Springer-Verlag 2007-01-13 2007-03 /pmc/articles/PMC1824751/ /pubmed/17356966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-006-0060-9 Text en © Society of General Internal Medicine 2007 |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lafata, Jennifer Elston Kolk, Deneil Peterson, Edward L. McCarthy, Bruce D. Weiss, Thomas W. Chen, Ya-Ting Muma, Bruce K. Improving Osteoporosis Screening: Results from a Randomized Cluster Trial |
title | Improving Osteoporosis Screening: Results from a Randomized Cluster Trial |
title_full | Improving Osteoporosis Screening: Results from a Randomized Cluster Trial |
title_fullStr | Improving Osteoporosis Screening: Results from a Randomized Cluster Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving Osteoporosis Screening: Results from a Randomized Cluster Trial |
title_short | Improving Osteoporosis Screening: Results from a Randomized Cluster Trial |
title_sort | improving osteoporosis screening: results from a randomized cluster trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1824751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17356966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-006-0060-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lafatajenniferelston improvingosteoporosisscreeningresultsfromarandomizedclustertrial AT kolkdeneil improvingosteoporosisscreeningresultsfromarandomizedclustertrial AT petersonedwardl improvingosteoporosisscreeningresultsfromarandomizedclustertrial AT mccarthybruced improvingosteoporosisscreeningresultsfromarandomizedclustertrial AT weissthomasw improvingosteoporosisscreeningresultsfromarandomizedclustertrial AT chenyating improvingosteoporosisscreeningresultsfromarandomizedclustertrial AT mumabrucek improvingosteoporosisscreeningresultsfromarandomizedclustertrial |