Cargando…

ERP evidence for different strategies in the processing of case markers in native speakers and non-native learners

BACKGROUND: The present experiments were designed to test how the linguistic feature of case is processed in Japanese by native and non-native listeners. We used a miniature version of Japanese as a model to compare sentence comprehension mechanisms in native speakers and non-native learners who had...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mueller, Jutta L, Hirotani, Masako, Friederici, Angela D
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1828061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17331265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-8-18
_version_ 1782132716101173248
author Mueller, Jutta L
Hirotani, Masako
Friederici, Angela D
author_facet Mueller, Jutta L
Hirotani, Masako
Friederici, Angela D
author_sort Mueller, Jutta L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The present experiments were designed to test how the linguistic feature of case is processed in Japanese by native and non-native listeners. We used a miniature version of Japanese as a model to compare sentence comprehension mechanisms in native speakers and non-native learners who had received training until they had mastered the system. In the first experiment we auditorily presented native Japanese speakers with sentences containing incorrect double nominatives and incorrect double accusatives, and with correct sentences. In the second experiment we tested trained non-natives with the same material. Based on previous research in German we expected an N400-P600 biphasic ERP response with specific modulations depending on the violated case and whether the listeners were native or non-native. RESULTS: For native Japanese participants the general ERP response to the case violations was an N400-P600 pattern. Double accusatives led to an additional enhancement of the P600 amplitude. For the learners a native-like P600 was present for double accusatives and for double nominatives. The additional negativity, however, was present in learners only for double nominative violations, and it was characterized by a different topographical distribution. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that native listeners use case markers for thematic as well as syntactic structure building during incremental sentence interpretation. The modulation of the P600 component for double accusatives possibly reflects case specific syntactic restrictions in Japanese. For adult language learners later processes, as reflected in the P600, seem to be more native-like compared to earlier processes. The anterior distribution of the negativity and its selective emergence for canonical sentences were taken to suggest that the non-native learners resorted to a rather formal processing strategy whereby they relied to a large degree on the phonologically salient nominative case marker.
format Text
id pubmed-1828061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18280612007-03-16 ERP evidence for different strategies in the processing of case markers in native speakers and non-native learners Mueller, Jutta L Hirotani, Masako Friederici, Angela D BMC Neurosci Research Article BACKGROUND: The present experiments were designed to test how the linguistic feature of case is processed in Japanese by native and non-native listeners. We used a miniature version of Japanese as a model to compare sentence comprehension mechanisms in native speakers and non-native learners who had received training until they had mastered the system. In the first experiment we auditorily presented native Japanese speakers with sentences containing incorrect double nominatives and incorrect double accusatives, and with correct sentences. In the second experiment we tested trained non-natives with the same material. Based on previous research in German we expected an N400-P600 biphasic ERP response with specific modulations depending on the violated case and whether the listeners were native or non-native. RESULTS: For native Japanese participants the general ERP response to the case violations was an N400-P600 pattern. Double accusatives led to an additional enhancement of the P600 amplitude. For the learners a native-like P600 was present for double accusatives and for double nominatives. The additional negativity, however, was present in learners only for double nominative violations, and it was characterized by a different topographical distribution. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that native listeners use case markers for thematic as well as syntactic structure building during incremental sentence interpretation. The modulation of the P600 component for double accusatives possibly reflects case specific syntactic restrictions in Japanese. For adult language learners later processes, as reflected in the P600, seem to be more native-like compared to earlier processes. The anterior distribution of the negativity and its selective emergence for canonical sentences were taken to suggest that the non-native learners resorted to a rather formal processing strategy whereby they relied to a large degree on the phonologically salient nominative case marker. BioMed Central 2007-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC1828061/ /pubmed/17331265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-8-18 Text en Copyright © 2007 Mueller et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mueller, Jutta L
Hirotani, Masako
Friederici, Angela D
ERP evidence for different strategies in the processing of case markers in native speakers and non-native learners
title ERP evidence for different strategies in the processing of case markers in native speakers and non-native learners
title_full ERP evidence for different strategies in the processing of case markers in native speakers and non-native learners
title_fullStr ERP evidence for different strategies in the processing of case markers in native speakers and non-native learners
title_full_unstemmed ERP evidence for different strategies in the processing of case markers in native speakers and non-native learners
title_short ERP evidence for different strategies in the processing of case markers in native speakers and non-native learners
title_sort erp evidence for different strategies in the processing of case markers in native speakers and non-native learners
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1828061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17331265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-8-18
work_keys_str_mv AT muellerjuttal erpevidencefordifferentstrategiesintheprocessingofcasemarkersinnativespeakersandnonnativelearners
AT hirotanimasako erpevidencefordifferentstrategiesintheprocessingofcasemarkersinnativespeakersandnonnativelearners
AT friedericiangelad erpevidencefordifferentstrategiesintheprocessingofcasemarkersinnativespeakersandnonnativelearners