Cargando…
Risk of contamination of nasal sprays in otolaryngologic practice
BACKGROUND: Reusable nasal-spray devices are frequently used in otolaryngologic examinations, and there is an increasing concern about the risk of cross-contamination from these devices. The aim of our study was to determine, by means of microbiologic analysis, the safety of a positive-displacement...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1828065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17352835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6815-7-2 |
_version_ | 1782132717342687232 |
---|---|
author | Aydin, Erdinc Hizal, Evren Akkuzu, Babur Azap, Ozlem |
author_facet | Aydin, Erdinc Hizal, Evren Akkuzu, Babur Azap, Ozlem |
author_sort | Aydin, Erdinc |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Reusable nasal-spray devices are frequently used in otolaryngologic examinations, and there is an increasing concern about the risk of cross-contamination from these devices. The aim of our study was to determine, by means of microbiologic analysis, the safety of a positive-displacement or pump-type atomizer after multiple uses. METHODS: A reusable nasal spray bottle, pump, and tips were used in the nasal physical examination of 282 patients admitted to a tertiary otolaryngology clinic. The effectiveness of 2 different methods of prophylaxis against microbiologic contamination (the use of protective punched caps or rinsing the bottle tip with alcohol) was compared with that of a control procedure. RESULTS: Although there was no statistically significant difference in positive culture rates among the types of nasal spray bottles tested, methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci were isolated in 4 of 198 cultures. CONCLUSION: Given these findings, we concluded that additional precautions (such as the use of an autoclave between sprays, disposable tips, or disposable devices) are warranted to avoid interpatient cross-contamination from a reusable nasal spray device. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1828065 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-18280652007-03-16 Risk of contamination of nasal sprays in otolaryngologic practice Aydin, Erdinc Hizal, Evren Akkuzu, Babur Azap, Ozlem BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Reusable nasal-spray devices are frequently used in otolaryngologic examinations, and there is an increasing concern about the risk of cross-contamination from these devices. The aim of our study was to determine, by means of microbiologic analysis, the safety of a positive-displacement or pump-type atomizer after multiple uses. METHODS: A reusable nasal spray bottle, pump, and tips were used in the nasal physical examination of 282 patients admitted to a tertiary otolaryngology clinic. The effectiveness of 2 different methods of prophylaxis against microbiologic contamination (the use of protective punched caps or rinsing the bottle tip with alcohol) was compared with that of a control procedure. RESULTS: Although there was no statistically significant difference in positive culture rates among the types of nasal spray bottles tested, methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci were isolated in 4 of 198 cultures. CONCLUSION: Given these findings, we concluded that additional precautions (such as the use of an autoclave between sprays, disposable tips, or disposable devices) are warranted to avoid interpatient cross-contamination from a reusable nasal spray device. BioMed Central 2007-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC1828065/ /pubmed/17352835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6815-7-2 Text en Copyright © 2007 Aydin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Aydin, Erdinc Hizal, Evren Akkuzu, Babur Azap, Ozlem Risk of contamination of nasal sprays in otolaryngologic practice |
title | Risk of contamination of nasal sprays in otolaryngologic practice |
title_full | Risk of contamination of nasal sprays in otolaryngologic practice |
title_fullStr | Risk of contamination of nasal sprays in otolaryngologic practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk of contamination of nasal sprays in otolaryngologic practice |
title_short | Risk of contamination of nasal sprays in otolaryngologic practice |
title_sort | risk of contamination of nasal sprays in otolaryngologic practice |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1828065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17352835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6815-7-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aydinerdinc riskofcontaminationofnasalspraysinotolaryngologicpractice AT hizalevren riskofcontaminationofnasalspraysinotolaryngologicpractice AT akkuzubabur riskofcontaminationofnasalspraysinotolaryngologicpractice AT azapozlem riskofcontaminationofnasalspraysinotolaryngologicpractice |