Cargando…
Clinical Implementation of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis: Summary of 2513 Postnatal Cases
BACKGROUND: Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (a-CGH) is a powerful molecular cytogenetic tool to detect genomic imbalances and study disease mechanism and pathogenesis. We report our experience with the clinical implementation of this high resolution human genome analysis, referred to as Chro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1828620/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17389918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000327 |
_version_ | 1782132731610660864 |
---|---|
author | Lu, Xinyan Shaw, Chad A. Patel, Ankita Li, Jiangzhen Cooper, M. Lance Wells, William R. Sullivan, Cathy M. Sahoo, Trilochan Yatsenko, Svetlana A. Bacino, Carlos A. Stankiewicz, Pawel Ou, Zhishu Chinault, A. Craig Beaudet, Arthur L. Lupski, James R. Cheung, Sau W. Ward, Patricia A. |
author_facet | Lu, Xinyan Shaw, Chad A. Patel, Ankita Li, Jiangzhen Cooper, M. Lance Wells, William R. Sullivan, Cathy M. Sahoo, Trilochan Yatsenko, Svetlana A. Bacino, Carlos A. Stankiewicz, Pawel Ou, Zhishu Chinault, A. Craig Beaudet, Arthur L. Lupski, James R. Cheung, Sau W. Ward, Patricia A. |
author_sort | Lu, Xinyan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (a-CGH) is a powerful molecular cytogenetic tool to detect genomic imbalances and study disease mechanism and pathogenesis. We report our experience with the clinical implementation of this high resolution human genome analysis, referred to as Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA). METHODS AND FINDINGS: CMA was performed clinically on 2513 postnatal samples from patients referred with a variety of clinical phenotypes. The initial 775 samples were studied using CMA array version 4 and the remaining 1738 samples were analyzed with CMA version 5 containing expanded genomic coverage. Overall, CMA identified clinically relevant genomic imbalances in 8.5% of patients: 7.6% using V4 and 8.9% using V5. Among 117 cases referred for additional investigation of a known cytogenetically detectable rearrangement, CMA identified the majority (92.5%) of the genomic imbalances. Importantly, abnormal CMA findings were observed in 5.2% of patients (98/1872) with normal karyotypes/FISH results, and V5, with expanded genomic coverage, enabled a higher detection rate in this category than V4. For cases without cytogenetic results available, 8.0% (42/524) abnormal CMA results were detected; again, V5 demonstrated an increased ability to detect abnormality. Improved diagnostic potential of CMA is illustrated by 90 cases identified with 51 cryptic microdeletions and 39 predicted apparent reciprocal microduplications in 13 specific chromosomal regions associated with 11 known genomic disorders. In addition, CMA identified copy number variations (CNVs) of uncertain significance in 262 probands; however, parental studies usually facilitated clinical interpretation. Of these, 217 were interpreted as familial variants and 11 were determined to be de novo; the remaining 34 await parental studies to resolve the clinical significance. CONCLUSIONS: This large set of clinical results demonstrates the significantly improved sensitivity of CMA for the detection of clinically relevant genomic imbalances and highlights the need for comprehensive genetic counseling to facilitate accurate clinical correlation and interpretation. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1828620 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-18286202007-03-28 Clinical Implementation of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis: Summary of 2513 Postnatal Cases Lu, Xinyan Shaw, Chad A. Patel, Ankita Li, Jiangzhen Cooper, M. Lance Wells, William R. Sullivan, Cathy M. Sahoo, Trilochan Yatsenko, Svetlana A. Bacino, Carlos A. Stankiewicz, Pawel Ou, Zhishu Chinault, A. Craig Beaudet, Arthur L. Lupski, James R. Cheung, Sau W. Ward, Patricia A. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (a-CGH) is a powerful molecular cytogenetic tool to detect genomic imbalances and study disease mechanism and pathogenesis. We report our experience with the clinical implementation of this high resolution human genome analysis, referred to as Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA). METHODS AND FINDINGS: CMA was performed clinically on 2513 postnatal samples from patients referred with a variety of clinical phenotypes. The initial 775 samples were studied using CMA array version 4 and the remaining 1738 samples were analyzed with CMA version 5 containing expanded genomic coverage. Overall, CMA identified clinically relevant genomic imbalances in 8.5% of patients: 7.6% using V4 and 8.9% using V5. Among 117 cases referred for additional investigation of a known cytogenetically detectable rearrangement, CMA identified the majority (92.5%) of the genomic imbalances. Importantly, abnormal CMA findings were observed in 5.2% of patients (98/1872) with normal karyotypes/FISH results, and V5, with expanded genomic coverage, enabled a higher detection rate in this category than V4. For cases without cytogenetic results available, 8.0% (42/524) abnormal CMA results were detected; again, V5 demonstrated an increased ability to detect abnormality. Improved diagnostic potential of CMA is illustrated by 90 cases identified with 51 cryptic microdeletions and 39 predicted apparent reciprocal microduplications in 13 specific chromosomal regions associated with 11 known genomic disorders. In addition, CMA identified copy number variations (CNVs) of uncertain significance in 262 probands; however, parental studies usually facilitated clinical interpretation. Of these, 217 were interpreted as familial variants and 11 were determined to be de novo; the remaining 34 await parental studies to resolve the clinical significance. CONCLUSIONS: This large set of clinical results demonstrates the significantly improved sensitivity of CMA for the detection of clinically relevant genomic imbalances and highlights the need for comprehensive genetic counseling to facilitate accurate clinical correlation and interpretation. Public Library of Science 2007-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC1828620/ /pubmed/17389918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000327 Text en Lu et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lu, Xinyan Shaw, Chad A. Patel, Ankita Li, Jiangzhen Cooper, M. Lance Wells, William R. Sullivan, Cathy M. Sahoo, Trilochan Yatsenko, Svetlana A. Bacino, Carlos A. Stankiewicz, Pawel Ou, Zhishu Chinault, A. Craig Beaudet, Arthur L. Lupski, James R. Cheung, Sau W. Ward, Patricia A. Clinical Implementation of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis: Summary of 2513 Postnatal Cases |
title | Clinical Implementation of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis: Summary of 2513 Postnatal Cases |
title_full | Clinical Implementation of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis: Summary of 2513 Postnatal Cases |
title_fullStr | Clinical Implementation of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis: Summary of 2513 Postnatal Cases |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Implementation of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis: Summary of 2513 Postnatal Cases |
title_short | Clinical Implementation of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis: Summary of 2513 Postnatal Cases |
title_sort | clinical implementation of chromosomal microarray analysis: summary of 2513 postnatal cases |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1828620/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17389918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000327 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luxinyan clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases AT shawchada clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases AT patelankita clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases AT lijiangzhen clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases AT coopermlance clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases AT wellswilliamr clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases AT sullivancathym clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases AT sahootrilochan clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases AT yatsenkosvetlanaa clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases AT bacinocarlosa clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases AT stankiewiczpawel clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases AT ouzhishu clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases AT chinaultacraig clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases AT beaudetarthurl clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases AT lupskijamesr clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases AT cheungsauw clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases AT wardpatriciaa clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases |