Cargando…

Clinical Implementation of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis: Summary of 2513 Postnatal Cases

BACKGROUND: Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (a-CGH) is a powerful molecular cytogenetic tool to detect genomic imbalances and study disease mechanism and pathogenesis. We report our experience with the clinical implementation of this high resolution human genome analysis, referred to as Chro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Xinyan, Shaw, Chad A., Patel, Ankita, Li, Jiangzhen, Cooper, M. Lance, Wells, William R., Sullivan, Cathy M., Sahoo, Trilochan, Yatsenko, Svetlana A., Bacino, Carlos A., Stankiewicz, Pawel, Ou, Zhishu, Chinault, A. Craig, Beaudet, Arthur L., Lupski, James R., Cheung, Sau W., Ward, Patricia A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1828620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17389918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000327
_version_ 1782132731610660864
author Lu, Xinyan
Shaw, Chad A.
Patel, Ankita
Li, Jiangzhen
Cooper, M. Lance
Wells, William R.
Sullivan, Cathy M.
Sahoo, Trilochan
Yatsenko, Svetlana A.
Bacino, Carlos A.
Stankiewicz, Pawel
Ou, Zhishu
Chinault, A. Craig
Beaudet, Arthur L.
Lupski, James R.
Cheung, Sau W.
Ward, Patricia A.
author_facet Lu, Xinyan
Shaw, Chad A.
Patel, Ankita
Li, Jiangzhen
Cooper, M. Lance
Wells, William R.
Sullivan, Cathy M.
Sahoo, Trilochan
Yatsenko, Svetlana A.
Bacino, Carlos A.
Stankiewicz, Pawel
Ou, Zhishu
Chinault, A. Craig
Beaudet, Arthur L.
Lupski, James R.
Cheung, Sau W.
Ward, Patricia A.
author_sort Lu, Xinyan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (a-CGH) is a powerful molecular cytogenetic tool to detect genomic imbalances and study disease mechanism and pathogenesis. We report our experience with the clinical implementation of this high resolution human genome analysis, referred to as Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA). METHODS AND FINDINGS: CMA was performed clinically on 2513 postnatal samples from patients referred with a variety of clinical phenotypes. The initial 775 samples were studied using CMA array version 4 and the remaining 1738 samples were analyzed with CMA version 5 containing expanded genomic coverage. Overall, CMA identified clinically relevant genomic imbalances in 8.5% of patients: 7.6% using V4 and 8.9% using V5. Among 117 cases referred for additional investigation of a known cytogenetically detectable rearrangement, CMA identified the majority (92.5%) of the genomic imbalances. Importantly, abnormal CMA findings were observed in 5.2% of patients (98/1872) with normal karyotypes/FISH results, and V5, with expanded genomic coverage, enabled a higher detection rate in this category than V4. For cases without cytogenetic results available, 8.0% (42/524) abnormal CMA results were detected; again, V5 demonstrated an increased ability to detect abnormality. Improved diagnostic potential of CMA is illustrated by 90 cases identified with 51 cryptic microdeletions and 39 predicted apparent reciprocal microduplications in 13 specific chromosomal regions associated with 11 known genomic disorders. In addition, CMA identified copy number variations (CNVs) of uncertain significance in 262 probands; however, parental studies usually facilitated clinical interpretation. Of these, 217 were interpreted as familial variants and 11 were determined to be de novo; the remaining 34 await parental studies to resolve the clinical significance. CONCLUSIONS: This large set of clinical results demonstrates the significantly improved sensitivity of CMA for the detection of clinically relevant genomic imbalances and highlights the need for comprehensive genetic counseling to facilitate accurate clinical correlation and interpretation.
format Text
id pubmed-1828620
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18286202007-03-28 Clinical Implementation of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis: Summary of 2513 Postnatal Cases Lu, Xinyan Shaw, Chad A. Patel, Ankita Li, Jiangzhen Cooper, M. Lance Wells, William R. Sullivan, Cathy M. Sahoo, Trilochan Yatsenko, Svetlana A. Bacino, Carlos A. Stankiewicz, Pawel Ou, Zhishu Chinault, A. Craig Beaudet, Arthur L. Lupski, James R. Cheung, Sau W. Ward, Patricia A. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (a-CGH) is a powerful molecular cytogenetic tool to detect genomic imbalances and study disease mechanism and pathogenesis. We report our experience with the clinical implementation of this high resolution human genome analysis, referred to as Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA). METHODS AND FINDINGS: CMA was performed clinically on 2513 postnatal samples from patients referred with a variety of clinical phenotypes. The initial 775 samples were studied using CMA array version 4 and the remaining 1738 samples were analyzed with CMA version 5 containing expanded genomic coverage. Overall, CMA identified clinically relevant genomic imbalances in 8.5% of patients: 7.6% using V4 and 8.9% using V5. Among 117 cases referred for additional investigation of a known cytogenetically detectable rearrangement, CMA identified the majority (92.5%) of the genomic imbalances. Importantly, abnormal CMA findings were observed in 5.2% of patients (98/1872) with normal karyotypes/FISH results, and V5, with expanded genomic coverage, enabled a higher detection rate in this category than V4. For cases without cytogenetic results available, 8.0% (42/524) abnormal CMA results were detected; again, V5 demonstrated an increased ability to detect abnormality. Improved diagnostic potential of CMA is illustrated by 90 cases identified with 51 cryptic microdeletions and 39 predicted apparent reciprocal microduplications in 13 specific chromosomal regions associated with 11 known genomic disorders. In addition, CMA identified copy number variations (CNVs) of uncertain significance in 262 probands; however, parental studies usually facilitated clinical interpretation. Of these, 217 were interpreted as familial variants and 11 were determined to be de novo; the remaining 34 await parental studies to resolve the clinical significance. CONCLUSIONS: This large set of clinical results demonstrates the significantly improved sensitivity of CMA for the detection of clinically relevant genomic imbalances and highlights the need for comprehensive genetic counseling to facilitate accurate clinical correlation and interpretation. Public Library of Science 2007-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC1828620/ /pubmed/17389918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000327 Text en Lu et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lu, Xinyan
Shaw, Chad A.
Patel, Ankita
Li, Jiangzhen
Cooper, M. Lance
Wells, William R.
Sullivan, Cathy M.
Sahoo, Trilochan
Yatsenko, Svetlana A.
Bacino, Carlos A.
Stankiewicz, Pawel
Ou, Zhishu
Chinault, A. Craig
Beaudet, Arthur L.
Lupski, James R.
Cheung, Sau W.
Ward, Patricia A.
Clinical Implementation of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis: Summary of 2513 Postnatal Cases
title Clinical Implementation of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis: Summary of 2513 Postnatal Cases
title_full Clinical Implementation of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis: Summary of 2513 Postnatal Cases
title_fullStr Clinical Implementation of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis: Summary of 2513 Postnatal Cases
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Implementation of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis: Summary of 2513 Postnatal Cases
title_short Clinical Implementation of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis: Summary of 2513 Postnatal Cases
title_sort clinical implementation of chromosomal microarray analysis: summary of 2513 postnatal cases
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1828620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17389918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000327
work_keys_str_mv AT luxinyan clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases
AT shawchada clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases
AT patelankita clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases
AT lijiangzhen clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases
AT coopermlance clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases
AT wellswilliamr clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases
AT sullivancathym clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases
AT sahootrilochan clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases
AT yatsenkosvetlanaa clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases
AT bacinocarlosa clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases
AT stankiewiczpawel clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases
AT ouzhishu clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases
AT chinaultacraig clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases
AT beaudetarthurl clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases
AT lupskijamesr clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases
AT cheungsauw clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases
AT wardpatriciaa clinicalimplementationofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysissummaryof2513postnatalcases