Cargando…

Association between Common Variation in 120 Candidate Genes and Breast Cancer Risk

Association studies in candidate genes have been widely used to search for common low penetrance susceptibility alleles, but few definite associations have been established. We have conducted association studies in breast cancer using an empirical single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) tagging approac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pharoah, Paul D. P, Tyrer, Jonathan, Dunning, Alison M, Easton, Douglas F, Ponder, Bruce A. J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1828694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17367212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0030042
_version_ 1782132734223712256
author Pharoah, Paul D. P
Tyrer, Jonathan
Dunning, Alison M
Easton, Douglas F
Ponder, Bruce A. J
author_facet Pharoah, Paul D. P
Tyrer, Jonathan
Dunning, Alison M
Easton, Douglas F
Ponder, Bruce A. J
author_sort Pharoah, Paul D. P
collection PubMed
description Association studies in candidate genes have been widely used to search for common low penetrance susceptibility alleles, but few definite associations have been established. We have conducted association studies in breast cancer using an empirical single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) tagging approach to capture common genetic variation in genes that are candidates for breast cancer based on their known function. We genotyped 710 SNPs in 120 candidate genes in up to 4,400 breast cancer cases and 4,400 controls using a staged design. Correction for population stratification was done using the genomic control method, on the basis of data from 280 genomic control SNPs. Evidence for association with each SNP was assessed using a Cochran–Armitage trend test (p-trend) and a two-degrees of freedom χ(2) test for heterogeneity (p-het). The most significant single SNP (p-trend = 8 × 10(−5)) was not significant at a nominal 5% level after adjusting for population stratification and multiple testing. To evaluate the overall evidence for an excess of positive associations over the proportion expected by chance, we applied two global tests: the admixture maximum likelihood (AML) test and the rank truncated product (RTP) test corrected for population stratification. The admixture maximum likelihood experiment-wise test for association was significant for both the heterogeneity test (p = 0.0031) and the trend test (p = 0.017), but no association was observed using the rank truncated product method for either the heterogeneity test or the trend test (p = 0.12 and p = 0.24, respectively). Genes in the cell-cycle control pathway and genes involved in steroid hormone metabolism and signalling were the main contributors to the association. These results suggest that a proportion of SNPs in these candidate genes are associated with breast cancer risk, but that the effects of individual SNPs is likely to be small. Large sample sizes from multicentre collaboration will be needed to identify associated SNPs with certainty.
format Text
id pubmed-1828694
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18286942007-03-30 Association between Common Variation in 120 Candidate Genes and Breast Cancer Risk Pharoah, Paul D. P Tyrer, Jonathan Dunning, Alison M Easton, Douglas F Ponder, Bruce A. J PLoS Genet Research Article Association studies in candidate genes have been widely used to search for common low penetrance susceptibility alleles, but few definite associations have been established. We have conducted association studies in breast cancer using an empirical single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) tagging approach to capture common genetic variation in genes that are candidates for breast cancer based on their known function. We genotyped 710 SNPs in 120 candidate genes in up to 4,400 breast cancer cases and 4,400 controls using a staged design. Correction for population stratification was done using the genomic control method, on the basis of data from 280 genomic control SNPs. Evidence for association with each SNP was assessed using a Cochran–Armitage trend test (p-trend) and a two-degrees of freedom χ(2) test for heterogeneity (p-het). The most significant single SNP (p-trend = 8 × 10(−5)) was not significant at a nominal 5% level after adjusting for population stratification and multiple testing. To evaluate the overall evidence for an excess of positive associations over the proportion expected by chance, we applied two global tests: the admixture maximum likelihood (AML) test and the rank truncated product (RTP) test corrected for population stratification. The admixture maximum likelihood experiment-wise test for association was significant for both the heterogeneity test (p = 0.0031) and the trend test (p = 0.017), but no association was observed using the rank truncated product method for either the heterogeneity test or the trend test (p = 0.12 and p = 0.24, respectively). Genes in the cell-cycle control pathway and genes involved in steroid hormone metabolism and signalling were the main contributors to the association. These results suggest that a proportion of SNPs in these candidate genes are associated with breast cancer risk, but that the effects of individual SNPs is likely to be small. Large sample sizes from multicentre collaboration will be needed to identify associated SNPs with certainty. Public Library of Science 2007-03 2007-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC1828694/ /pubmed/17367212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0030042 Text en © 2007 Pharoah et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pharoah, Paul D. P
Tyrer, Jonathan
Dunning, Alison M
Easton, Douglas F
Ponder, Bruce A. J
Association between Common Variation in 120 Candidate Genes and Breast Cancer Risk
title Association between Common Variation in 120 Candidate Genes and Breast Cancer Risk
title_full Association between Common Variation in 120 Candidate Genes and Breast Cancer Risk
title_fullStr Association between Common Variation in 120 Candidate Genes and Breast Cancer Risk
title_full_unstemmed Association between Common Variation in 120 Candidate Genes and Breast Cancer Risk
title_short Association between Common Variation in 120 Candidate Genes and Breast Cancer Risk
title_sort association between common variation in 120 candidate genes and breast cancer risk
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1828694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17367212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0030042
work_keys_str_mv AT pharoahpauldp associationbetweencommonvariationin120candidategenesandbreastcancerrisk
AT tyrerjonathan associationbetweencommonvariationin120candidategenesandbreastcancerrisk
AT dunningalisonm associationbetweencommonvariationin120candidategenesandbreastcancerrisk
AT eastondouglasf associationbetweencommonvariationin120candidategenesandbreastcancerrisk
AT ponderbruceaj associationbetweencommonvariationin120candidategenesandbreastcancerrisk
AT associationbetweencommonvariationin120candidategenesandbreastcancerrisk