Cargando…

Biomechanical effects of polyaxial pedicle screw fixation on the lumbosacral segments with an anterior interbody cage support

BACKGROUND: Lumbosacral fusion is a relatively common procedure that is used in the management of an unstable spine. The anterior interbody cage has been involved to enhance the stability of a pedicle screw construct used at the lumbosacral junction. Biomechanical differences between polyaxial and m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Shih-Hao, Mo Lin, Ruey, Chen, Hsiang-Ho, Tsai, Kai-Jow
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1829160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17349057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-28
_version_ 1782132748033458176
author Chen, Shih-Hao
Mo Lin, Ruey
Chen, Hsiang-Ho
Tsai, Kai-Jow
author_facet Chen, Shih-Hao
Mo Lin, Ruey
Chen, Hsiang-Ho
Tsai, Kai-Jow
author_sort Chen, Shih-Hao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lumbosacral fusion is a relatively common procedure that is used in the management of an unstable spine. The anterior interbody cage has been involved to enhance the stability of a pedicle screw construct used at the lumbosacral junction. Biomechanical differences between polyaxial and monoaxial pedicle screws linked with various rod contours were investigated to analyze the respective effects on overall construct stiffness, cage strain, rod strain, and contact ratios at the vertebra-cage junction. METHODS: A synthetic model composed of two ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene blocks was used with four titanium pedicle screws (two in each block) and two rods fixation to build the spinal construct along with an anterior interbody cage support. For each pair of the construct fixed with polyaxial or monoaxial screws, the linked rods were set at four configurations to simulate 0°, 7°, 14°, and 21° lordosis on the sagittal plane, and a compressive load of 300 N was applied. Strain gauges were attached to the posterior surface of the cage and to the central area of the left connecting rod. Also, the contact area between the block and the cage was measured using prescale Fuji super low pressure film for compression, flexion, lateral bending and torsion tests. RESULTS: Our main findings in the experiments with an anterior interbody cage support are as follows: 1) large segmental lordosis can decrease the stiffness of monoaxial pedicle screws constructs; 2) polyaxial screws rather than monoaxial screws combined with the cage fixation provide higher compression and flexion stiffness in 21° segmental lordosis; 3) polyaxial screws enhance the contact surface of the cage in 21° segmental lordosis. CONCLUSION: Polyaxial screws system used in conjunction with anterior cage support yields higher contact ratio, compression and flexion stiffness of spinal constructs than monoaxial screws system does in the same model when the spinal segment is set at large lordotic angles. Polyaxial pedicle screw fixation performs nearly equal percentages of vertebra-cage contact among all constructs with different sagittal alignments, therefore enhances the stabilization effect of interbody cages in the lumbosacral area.
format Text
id pubmed-1829160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18291602007-03-21 Biomechanical effects of polyaxial pedicle screw fixation on the lumbosacral segments with an anterior interbody cage support Chen, Shih-Hao Mo Lin, Ruey Chen, Hsiang-Ho Tsai, Kai-Jow BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Lumbosacral fusion is a relatively common procedure that is used in the management of an unstable spine. The anterior interbody cage has been involved to enhance the stability of a pedicle screw construct used at the lumbosacral junction. Biomechanical differences between polyaxial and monoaxial pedicle screws linked with various rod contours were investigated to analyze the respective effects on overall construct stiffness, cage strain, rod strain, and contact ratios at the vertebra-cage junction. METHODS: A synthetic model composed of two ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene blocks was used with four titanium pedicle screws (two in each block) and two rods fixation to build the spinal construct along with an anterior interbody cage support. For each pair of the construct fixed with polyaxial or monoaxial screws, the linked rods were set at four configurations to simulate 0°, 7°, 14°, and 21° lordosis on the sagittal plane, and a compressive load of 300 N was applied. Strain gauges were attached to the posterior surface of the cage and to the central area of the left connecting rod. Also, the contact area between the block and the cage was measured using prescale Fuji super low pressure film for compression, flexion, lateral bending and torsion tests. RESULTS: Our main findings in the experiments with an anterior interbody cage support are as follows: 1) large segmental lordosis can decrease the stiffness of monoaxial pedicle screws constructs; 2) polyaxial screws rather than monoaxial screws combined with the cage fixation provide higher compression and flexion stiffness in 21° segmental lordosis; 3) polyaxial screws enhance the contact surface of the cage in 21° segmental lordosis. CONCLUSION: Polyaxial screws system used in conjunction with anterior cage support yields higher contact ratio, compression and flexion stiffness of spinal constructs than monoaxial screws system does in the same model when the spinal segment is set at large lordotic angles. Polyaxial pedicle screw fixation performs nearly equal percentages of vertebra-cage contact among all constructs with different sagittal alignments, therefore enhances the stabilization effect of interbody cages in the lumbosacral area. BioMed Central 2007-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC1829160/ /pubmed/17349057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-28 Text en Copyright © 2007 Chen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Shih-Hao
Mo Lin, Ruey
Chen, Hsiang-Ho
Tsai, Kai-Jow
Biomechanical effects of polyaxial pedicle screw fixation on the lumbosacral segments with an anterior interbody cage support
title Biomechanical effects of polyaxial pedicle screw fixation on the lumbosacral segments with an anterior interbody cage support
title_full Biomechanical effects of polyaxial pedicle screw fixation on the lumbosacral segments with an anterior interbody cage support
title_fullStr Biomechanical effects of polyaxial pedicle screw fixation on the lumbosacral segments with an anterior interbody cage support
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical effects of polyaxial pedicle screw fixation on the lumbosacral segments with an anterior interbody cage support
title_short Biomechanical effects of polyaxial pedicle screw fixation on the lumbosacral segments with an anterior interbody cage support
title_sort biomechanical effects of polyaxial pedicle screw fixation on the lumbosacral segments with an anterior interbody cage support
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1829160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17349057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-28
work_keys_str_mv AT chenshihhao biomechanicaleffectsofpolyaxialpediclescrewfixationonthelumbosacralsegmentswithananteriorinterbodycagesupport
AT molinruey biomechanicaleffectsofpolyaxialpediclescrewfixationonthelumbosacralsegmentswithananteriorinterbodycagesupport
AT chenhsiangho biomechanicaleffectsofpolyaxialpediclescrewfixationonthelumbosacralsegmentswithananteriorinterbodycagesupport
AT tsaikaijow biomechanicaleffectsofpolyaxialpediclescrewfixationonthelumbosacralsegmentswithananteriorinterbodycagesupport