Cargando…

Recovery after Minor Traffic Injuries: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of an acute multidisciplinary group intervention on self-perceived recovery following minor traffic-related musculoskeletal injuries. DESIGN: Open, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: A large inner-city hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 127 patients (≥15 y) with traffic-re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ottosson, Carin, Pettersson, Hans, Johansson, Sven-Erik, Nyrén, Olof, Ponzer, Sari
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1829405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17380190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020014
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of an acute multidisciplinary group intervention on self-perceived recovery following minor traffic-related musculoskeletal injuries. DESIGN: Open, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: A large inner-city hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 127 patients (≥15 y) with traffic-related acute minor musculoskeletal injuries and predicted to be at risk for delayed recovery were randomized into an intervention group (n = 65) or a control group (n = 62). INTERVENTION: Four 1½-h sessions in open groups with the aim of providing information about injuries in general, calling attention to the importance of self-care and promoting physical activity. In addition, both groups received standard medical care by regular staff. OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was self-reported recovery at 12 mo. Secondary outcome measures were ratings of functional health status (SF-36, SMFA), pain and mental distress on visual analog scales, and self-reported duration of sick leave. RESULTS: At 12 mo, there was a 21.9 percentage point difference: 52.4% of the patients in the intervention group and 30.5% in the control group reported self-perceived recovery (95% confidence interval for the difference 5%–38%; p = 0.03). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding the secondary outcome measures. CONCLUSION: A simple group intervention may accelerate the self-perceived recovery in selected patients. As we did not find evidence of improvements in the secondary outcome measures, the clinical significance of the treatment benefit remains to be defined.