Cargando…

Factors Influencing Physicians’ Screening Behavior for Liver Cancer Among High-risk Patients

BACKGROUND: Little is known about physicians’ screening patterns for liver cancer despite its rising incidence. OBJECTIVE: Describe physician factors associated with liver cancer screening. DESIGN: Mailed survey. PARTICIPANTS: Physicians practicing in family practice, internal medicine, gastroentero...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nguyen, Tung T., Gildengorin, Ginny, Truong, Amy, McPhee, Stephen J.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1829432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17372804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0128-1
_version_ 1782132758851616768
author Nguyen, Tung T.
Gildengorin, Ginny
Truong, Amy
McPhee, Stephen J.
author_facet Nguyen, Tung T.
Gildengorin, Ginny
Truong, Amy
McPhee, Stephen J.
author_sort Nguyen, Tung T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Little is known about physicians’ screening patterns for liver cancer despite its rising incidence. OBJECTIVE: Describe physician factors associated with liver cancer screening. DESIGN: Mailed survey. PARTICIPANTS: Physicians practicing in family practice, internal medicine, gastroenterology, or nephrology in 3 northern California counties in 2004. MEASUREMENTS: Sociodemographic and practice measures, liver cancer knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported screening behaviors. RESULTS: The response rate was 61.8% (N = 459). Gastroenterologists (100%) were more likely than Internists (88.4%), family practitioners (84.2%), or nephrologists (75.0%) to screen for liver cancer in high-risk patients (p = 0.016). In multivariate analysis, screeners were more likely than nonscreeners to think that screening for liver cancer reduced mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.60, CI 1.09–2.34) and that not screening was a malpractice risk (OR 1.88, CI 1.29–2.75). Screeners were more likely than nonscreeners to order any screening test if it was a quality of care measure (OR 4.39, CI 1.79–10.81). CONCLUSIONS: Despite debate about screening efficacy, many physicians screen for liver cancer. Their screening behavior is influenced by malpractice and quality control concerns. More research is needed to develop better screening tests for liver cancer, to evaluate their effectiveness, and to understand how physicians behave when there is insufficient evidence.
format Text
id pubmed-1829432
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18294322008-04-01 Factors Influencing Physicians’ Screening Behavior for Liver Cancer Among High-risk Patients Nguyen, Tung T. Gildengorin, Ginny Truong, Amy McPhee, Stephen J. J Gen Intern Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Little is known about physicians’ screening patterns for liver cancer despite its rising incidence. OBJECTIVE: Describe physician factors associated with liver cancer screening. DESIGN: Mailed survey. PARTICIPANTS: Physicians practicing in family practice, internal medicine, gastroenterology, or nephrology in 3 northern California counties in 2004. MEASUREMENTS: Sociodemographic and practice measures, liver cancer knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported screening behaviors. RESULTS: The response rate was 61.8% (N = 459). Gastroenterologists (100%) were more likely than Internists (88.4%), family practitioners (84.2%), or nephrologists (75.0%) to screen for liver cancer in high-risk patients (p = 0.016). In multivariate analysis, screeners were more likely than nonscreeners to think that screening for liver cancer reduced mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.60, CI 1.09–2.34) and that not screening was a malpractice risk (OR 1.88, CI 1.29–2.75). Screeners were more likely than nonscreeners to order any screening test if it was a quality of care measure (OR 4.39, CI 1.79–10.81). CONCLUSIONS: Despite debate about screening efficacy, many physicians screen for liver cancer. Their screening behavior is influenced by malpractice and quality control concerns. More research is needed to develop better screening tests for liver cancer, to evaluate their effectiveness, and to understand how physicians behave when there is insufficient evidence. Springer-Verlag 2007-01-30 2007-04 /pmc/articles/PMC1829432/ /pubmed/17372804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0128-1 Text en © Society of General Internal Medicine 2007
spellingShingle Original Article
Nguyen, Tung T.
Gildengorin, Ginny
Truong, Amy
McPhee, Stephen J.
Factors Influencing Physicians’ Screening Behavior for Liver Cancer Among High-risk Patients
title Factors Influencing Physicians’ Screening Behavior for Liver Cancer Among High-risk Patients
title_full Factors Influencing Physicians’ Screening Behavior for Liver Cancer Among High-risk Patients
title_fullStr Factors Influencing Physicians’ Screening Behavior for Liver Cancer Among High-risk Patients
title_full_unstemmed Factors Influencing Physicians’ Screening Behavior for Liver Cancer Among High-risk Patients
title_short Factors Influencing Physicians’ Screening Behavior for Liver Cancer Among High-risk Patients
title_sort factors influencing physicians’ screening behavior for liver cancer among high-risk patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1829432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17372804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0128-1
work_keys_str_mv AT nguyentungt factorsinfluencingphysiciansscreeningbehaviorforlivercanceramonghighriskpatients
AT gildengoringinny factorsinfluencingphysiciansscreeningbehaviorforlivercanceramonghighriskpatients
AT truongamy factorsinfluencingphysiciansscreeningbehaviorforlivercanceramonghighriskpatients
AT mcpheestephenj factorsinfluencingphysiciansscreeningbehaviorforlivercanceramonghighriskpatients