Cargando…
The Costs of an Outreach Intervention for Low-Income Women With Abnormal Pap Smears
INTRODUCTION: Follow-up among women who have had an abnormal Papanicolaou (Pap) smear is often poor in public hospitals that serve women at increased risk for cervical cancer. This randomized controlled trial evaluated and compared the total cost and cost per follow-up of a tailored outreach interve...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1832136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17173719 |
_version_ | 1782132805642223616 |
---|---|
author | Wagner, Todd H Engelstad, Linda P McPhee, Stephen J Pasick, Rena J |
author_facet | Wagner, Todd H Engelstad, Linda P McPhee, Stephen J Pasick, Rena J |
author_sort | Wagner, Todd H |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Follow-up among women who have had an abnormal Papanicolaou (Pap) smear is often poor in public hospitals that serve women at increased risk for cervical cancer. This randomized controlled trial evaluated and compared the total cost and cost per follow-up of a tailored outreach intervention plus usual care with the total cost and cost per follow-up of usual care alone. METHODS: Women with an abnormal Pap smear (n = 348) receiving care at Alameda County Medical Center (Alameda County, California) were randomized to intervention or usual care. The intervention used trained community health advisors to complement the clinic's protocol for usual care. We assessed the costs of the intervention and the cost per follow-up within 6 months of the abnormal Pap smear test result. RESULTS: The intervention increased the rate of 6-month follow-up by 29 percentage points, and the incremental cost per follow-up was $959 (2005 dollars). The cost per follow-up varied by the severity of the abnormality. The cost per follow-up for the most severe abnormality (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) was $681, while the cost per follow-up for less severe abnormalities was higher. CONCLUSION: In a health care system in which many women fail to get follow-up care for an abnormal Pap smear, outreach workers were more effective than usual care (mail or telephone reminders) at increasing follow-up rates. The results suggest that outreach workers should manage their effort based on the degree of abnormality; most effort should be placed on women with the most severe abnormality (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion). |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1832136 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-18321362007-04-05 The Costs of an Outreach Intervention for Low-Income Women With Abnormal Pap Smears Wagner, Todd H Engelstad, Linda P McPhee, Stephen J Pasick, Rena J Prev Chronic Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: Follow-up among women who have had an abnormal Papanicolaou (Pap) smear is often poor in public hospitals that serve women at increased risk for cervical cancer. This randomized controlled trial evaluated and compared the total cost and cost per follow-up of a tailored outreach intervention plus usual care with the total cost and cost per follow-up of usual care alone. METHODS: Women with an abnormal Pap smear (n = 348) receiving care at Alameda County Medical Center (Alameda County, California) were randomized to intervention or usual care. The intervention used trained community health advisors to complement the clinic's protocol for usual care. We assessed the costs of the intervention and the cost per follow-up within 6 months of the abnormal Pap smear test result. RESULTS: The intervention increased the rate of 6-month follow-up by 29 percentage points, and the incremental cost per follow-up was $959 (2005 dollars). The cost per follow-up varied by the severity of the abnormality. The cost per follow-up for the most severe abnormality (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) was $681, while the cost per follow-up for less severe abnormalities was higher. CONCLUSION: In a health care system in which many women fail to get follow-up care for an abnormal Pap smear, outreach workers were more effective than usual care (mail or telephone reminders) at increasing follow-up rates. The results suggest that outreach workers should manage their effort based on the degree of abnormality; most effort should be placed on women with the most severe abnormality (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2006-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC1832136/ /pubmed/17173719 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Wagner, Todd H Engelstad, Linda P McPhee, Stephen J Pasick, Rena J The Costs of an Outreach Intervention for Low-Income Women With Abnormal Pap Smears |
title | The Costs of an Outreach Intervention for Low-Income Women With Abnormal Pap Smears |
title_full | The Costs of an Outreach Intervention for Low-Income Women With Abnormal Pap Smears |
title_fullStr | The Costs of an Outreach Intervention for Low-Income Women With Abnormal Pap Smears |
title_full_unstemmed | The Costs of an Outreach Intervention for Low-Income Women With Abnormal Pap Smears |
title_short | The Costs of an Outreach Intervention for Low-Income Women With Abnormal Pap Smears |
title_sort | costs of an outreach intervention for low-income women with abnormal pap smears |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1832136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17173719 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wagnertoddh thecostsofanoutreachinterventionforlowincomewomenwithabnormalpapsmears AT engelstadlindap thecostsofanoutreachinterventionforlowincomewomenwithabnormalpapsmears AT mcpheestephenj thecostsofanoutreachinterventionforlowincomewomenwithabnormalpapsmears AT pasickrenaj thecostsofanoutreachinterventionforlowincomewomenwithabnormalpapsmears AT wagnertoddh costsofanoutreachinterventionforlowincomewomenwithabnormalpapsmears AT engelstadlindap costsofanoutreachinterventionforlowincomewomenwithabnormalpapsmears AT mcpheestephenj costsofanoutreachinterventionforlowincomewomenwithabnormalpapsmears AT pasickrenaj costsofanoutreachinterventionforlowincomewomenwithabnormalpapsmears |