Cargando…

An automated method for high-throughput protein purification applied to a comparison of His-tag and GST-tag affinity chromatography

BACKGROUND: Functional Genomics, the systematic characterisation of the functions of an organism's genes, includes the study of the gene products, the proteins. Such studies require methods to express and purify these proteins in a parallel, time and cost effective manner. RESULTS: We developed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scheich, Christoph, Sievert, Volker, Büssow, Konrad
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC183854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12885298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-3-12
_version_ 1782120883537575936
author Scheich, Christoph
Sievert, Volker
Büssow, Konrad
author_facet Scheich, Christoph
Sievert, Volker
Büssow, Konrad
author_sort Scheich, Christoph
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Functional Genomics, the systematic characterisation of the functions of an organism's genes, includes the study of the gene products, the proteins. Such studies require methods to express and purify these proteins in a parallel, time and cost effective manner. RESULTS: We developed a method for parallel expression and purification of recombinant proteins with a hexahistidine tag (His-tag) or glutathione S-transferase (GST)-tag from bacterial expression systems. Proteins are expressed in 96-well microplates and are purified by a fully automated procedure on a pipetting robot. Up to 90 microgram purified protein can be obtained from 1 ml microplate cultures. The procedure is readily reproducible and 96 proteins can be purified in approximately three hours. It avoids clearing of crude cellular lysates and the use of magnetic affinity beads and is therefore less expensive than comparable commercial systems. We have used this method to compare purification of a set of human proteins via His-tag or GST-tag. Proteins were expressed as fusions to an N-terminal tandem His- and GST-tag and were purified by metal chelating or glutathione affinity chromatography. The purity of the obtained protein samples was similar, yet His-tag purification resulted in higher yields for some proteins. CONCLUSION: A fully automated, robust and cost effective method was developed for the purification of proteins that can be used to quickly characterise expression clones in high throughput and to produce large numbers of proteins for functional studies. His-tag affinity purification was found to be more efficient than purification via GST-tag for some proteins.
format Text
id pubmed-183854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-1838542003-08-27 An automated method for high-throughput protein purification applied to a comparison of His-tag and GST-tag affinity chromatography Scheich, Christoph Sievert, Volker Büssow, Konrad BMC Biotechnol Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Functional Genomics, the systematic characterisation of the functions of an organism's genes, includes the study of the gene products, the proteins. Such studies require methods to express and purify these proteins in a parallel, time and cost effective manner. RESULTS: We developed a method for parallel expression and purification of recombinant proteins with a hexahistidine tag (His-tag) or glutathione S-transferase (GST)-tag from bacterial expression systems. Proteins are expressed in 96-well microplates and are purified by a fully automated procedure on a pipetting robot. Up to 90 microgram purified protein can be obtained from 1 ml microplate cultures. The procedure is readily reproducible and 96 proteins can be purified in approximately three hours. It avoids clearing of crude cellular lysates and the use of magnetic affinity beads and is therefore less expensive than comparable commercial systems. We have used this method to compare purification of a set of human proteins via His-tag or GST-tag. Proteins were expressed as fusions to an N-terminal tandem His- and GST-tag and were purified by metal chelating or glutathione affinity chromatography. The purity of the obtained protein samples was similar, yet His-tag purification resulted in higher yields for some proteins. CONCLUSION: A fully automated, robust and cost effective method was developed for the purification of proteins that can be used to quickly characterise expression clones in high throughput and to produce large numbers of proteins for functional studies. His-tag affinity purification was found to be more efficient than purification via GST-tag for some proteins. BioMed Central 2003-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC183854/ /pubmed/12885298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-3-12 Text en Copyright © 2003 Scheich et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Scheich, Christoph
Sievert, Volker
Büssow, Konrad
An automated method for high-throughput protein purification applied to a comparison of His-tag and GST-tag affinity chromatography
title An automated method for high-throughput protein purification applied to a comparison of His-tag and GST-tag affinity chromatography
title_full An automated method for high-throughput protein purification applied to a comparison of His-tag and GST-tag affinity chromatography
title_fullStr An automated method for high-throughput protein purification applied to a comparison of His-tag and GST-tag affinity chromatography
title_full_unstemmed An automated method for high-throughput protein purification applied to a comparison of His-tag and GST-tag affinity chromatography
title_short An automated method for high-throughput protein purification applied to a comparison of His-tag and GST-tag affinity chromatography
title_sort automated method for high-throughput protein purification applied to a comparison of his-tag and gst-tag affinity chromatography
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC183854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12885298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-3-12
work_keys_str_mv AT scheichchristoph anautomatedmethodforhighthroughputproteinpurificationappliedtoacomparisonofhistagandgsttagaffinitychromatography
AT sievertvolker anautomatedmethodforhighthroughputproteinpurificationappliedtoacomparisonofhistagandgsttagaffinitychromatography
AT bussowkonrad anautomatedmethodforhighthroughputproteinpurificationappliedtoacomparisonofhistagandgsttagaffinitychromatography
AT scheichchristoph automatedmethodforhighthroughputproteinpurificationappliedtoacomparisonofhistagandgsttagaffinitychromatography
AT sievertvolker automatedmethodforhighthroughputproteinpurificationappliedtoacomparisonofhistagandgsttagaffinitychromatography
AT bussowkonrad automatedmethodforhighthroughputproteinpurificationappliedtoacomparisonofhistagandgsttagaffinitychromatography