Cargando…
More insight into the fate of biomedical meeting abstracts: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: It has been estimated that about 45% of abstracts that are accepted for presentation at biomedical meetings will subsequently be published in full. The acceptance of abstracts at meetings and their fate after initial rejection are less well understood. We set out to estimate the proporti...
Autores principales: | von Elm, Erik, Costanza, Michael C, Walder, Bernhard, Tramèr, Martin R |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2003
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC184388/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12854973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-3-12 |
Ejemplares similares
-
How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A cross-sectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors
por: Elia, Nadia, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Fate of Abstracts Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Korean Urological Association
por: Chung, Jae Hoon, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Fate of Clinical Research Studies after Ethical Approval – Follow-Up of Study Protocols until Publication
por: Blümle, Anette, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
What is the fate of scientific abstracts presented at the International Society for Hip Arthroscopy meetings?
por: Nwachukwu, Benedict U, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Multi-lumen central venous catheters increase the risk of bloodstream infection: evidence from a systematic review
por: Zürcher, M, et al.
Publicado: (2002)