Cargando…
Parents' champions vs. vested interests: Who do parents believe about MMR? A qualitative study
BACKGROUND: Despite the Government acting quickly to reassure parents about MMR safety following the publication of the 1998 paper by Wakefield and colleagues, MMR uptake declined. One of the reasons suggested for this decline is a loss of public trust in politicians and health professionals. The pu...
Autores principales: | Hilton, Shona, Petticrew, Mark, Hunt, Kate |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1851707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17391507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-7-42 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The independent effects of source expertise and trustworthiness on retraction believability: The moderating role of vested interest
por: Susmann, Mark W., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Reporting of MMR evidence in professional publications: 1988–2007
por: Hilton, S, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Can parents believe websites’ information about methylphenidate’s side effects?
por: Arsac England, Tom, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Parents Reaching Out to Parents: An Appreciative, Qualitative Evaluation of Stakeholder Experiences of the Parent Champions in the Community Project
por: Carter, Bernie, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Beware of vested interests: Epistemic vigilance improves reasoning about scientific evidence (for some people)
por: Gierth, Lukas, et al.
Publicado: (2020)