Cargando…
Moving research into practice: lessons from the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's IDSRN program
BACKGROUND: The U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ) Integrated Delivery Systems Research Network (IDSRN) program was established to foster public-private collaboration between health services researchers and health care delivery systems. Its broad goal was to link researche...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1851710/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17394644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-9 |
_version_ | 1782132982974251008 |
---|---|
author | Gold, Marsha Taylor, Erin Fries |
author_facet | Gold, Marsha Taylor, Erin Fries |
author_sort | Gold, Marsha |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ) Integrated Delivery Systems Research Network (IDSRN) program was established to foster public-private collaboration between health services researchers and health care delivery systems. Its broad goal was to link researchers and delivery systems to encourage implementation of research into practice. We evaluated the program to address two primary questions: 1) How successful was IDSRN in generating research findings that could be applied in practice? and 2) What factors facilitate or impede such success? METHODS: We conducted in-person and telephone interviews with AHRQ staff and nine IDSRN partner organizations and their collaborators, reviewed program documents, analyzed projects funded through the program, and developed case studies of four IDSRN projects judged promising in supporting research implementation. RESULTS: Participants reported that the IDSRN structure was valuable in creating closer ties between researchers and participating health systems. Of the 50 completed projects studied, 30 had an operational effect or use. Some kinds of projects were more successful than others in influencing operations. If certain conditions were met, a variety of partnership models successfully supported implementation. An internal champion was necessary for partnerships involving researchers based outside the delivery system. Case studies identified several factors important to success: responsiveness of project work to delivery system needs, ongoing funding to support multiple project phases, and development of applied products or tools that helped users see their operational relevance. Factors limiting success included limited project funding, competing demands on potential research users, and failure to reach the appropriate audience. CONCLUSION: Forging stronger partnerships between researchers and delivery systems has the potential to make research more relevant to users, but these benefits require clear goals and appropriate targeting of resources. Trade-offs are inevitable. The health services research community can best consider such trade-offs and set priorities if there is more dialogue to identify areas and approaches where such partnerships may have the most promise. Though it has unique features, the IDSRN experience is relevant to research implementation in diverse settings. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1851710 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-18517102007-04-12 Moving research into practice: lessons from the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's IDSRN program Gold, Marsha Taylor, Erin Fries Implement Sci Research Article BACKGROUND: The U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ) Integrated Delivery Systems Research Network (IDSRN) program was established to foster public-private collaboration between health services researchers and health care delivery systems. Its broad goal was to link researchers and delivery systems to encourage implementation of research into practice. We evaluated the program to address two primary questions: 1) How successful was IDSRN in generating research findings that could be applied in practice? and 2) What factors facilitate or impede such success? METHODS: We conducted in-person and telephone interviews with AHRQ staff and nine IDSRN partner organizations and their collaborators, reviewed program documents, analyzed projects funded through the program, and developed case studies of four IDSRN projects judged promising in supporting research implementation. RESULTS: Participants reported that the IDSRN structure was valuable in creating closer ties between researchers and participating health systems. Of the 50 completed projects studied, 30 had an operational effect or use. Some kinds of projects were more successful than others in influencing operations. If certain conditions were met, a variety of partnership models successfully supported implementation. An internal champion was necessary for partnerships involving researchers based outside the delivery system. Case studies identified several factors important to success: responsiveness of project work to delivery system needs, ongoing funding to support multiple project phases, and development of applied products or tools that helped users see their operational relevance. Factors limiting success included limited project funding, competing demands on potential research users, and failure to reach the appropriate audience. CONCLUSION: Forging stronger partnerships between researchers and delivery systems has the potential to make research more relevant to users, but these benefits require clear goals and appropriate targeting of resources. Trade-offs are inevitable. The health services research community can best consider such trade-offs and set priorities if there is more dialogue to identify areas and approaches where such partnerships may have the most promise. Though it has unique features, the IDSRN experience is relevant to research implementation in diverse settings. BioMed Central 2007-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC1851710/ /pubmed/17394644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-9 Text en Copyright © 2007 Gold and Taylor; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gold, Marsha Taylor, Erin Fries Moving research into practice: lessons from the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's IDSRN program |
title | Moving research into practice: lessons from the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's IDSRN program |
title_full | Moving research into practice: lessons from the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's IDSRN program |
title_fullStr | Moving research into practice: lessons from the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's IDSRN program |
title_full_unstemmed | Moving research into practice: lessons from the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's IDSRN program |
title_short | Moving research into practice: lessons from the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's IDSRN program |
title_sort | moving research into practice: lessons from the us agency for healthcare research and quality's idsrn program |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1851710/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17394644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goldmarsha movingresearchintopracticelessonsfromtheusagencyforhealthcareresearchandqualitysidsrnprogram AT taylorerinfries movingresearchintopracticelessonsfromtheusagencyforhealthcareresearchandqualitysidsrnprogram |