Cargando…

Clinical Safety-in-Use Study of a New Tampon Design

Objective: To confirm the safety of a new experimental Tampax(®) tampon and applicator compared with that of a currently marketed Tampax(®) tampon and applicator using comprehensive gynecological and microbiological assessments. Methods: A 2-month, single-blind, randomized, crossover study was condu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shehin, Stacey E., Jones, Michaelle B., Hochwalt, Anne E., Sarbaugh, Frank C., Nunn, Stephen
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1852271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14627214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10647440300025504
_version_ 1782133021937238016
author Shehin, Stacey E.
Jones, Michaelle B.
Hochwalt, Anne E.
Sarbaugh, Frank C.
Nunn, Stephen
author_facet Shehin, Stacey E.
Jones, Michaelle B.
Hochwalt, Anne E.
Sarbaugh, Frank C.
Nunn, Stephen
author_sort Shehin, Stacey E.
collection PubMed
description Objective: To confirm the safety of a new experimental Tampax(®) tampon and applicator compared with that of a currently marketed Tampax(®) tampon and applicator using comprehensive gynecological and microbiological assessments. Methods: A 2-month, single-blind, randomized, crossover study was conducted in which each subject served as her own control. Safety was evaluated by comparing potential product-related irritation (using colposcopic examination and subject diary data), assessment of vaginal discharge, vaginal pH, and effects on selected microorganisms (yeast, Escherichia coli ,Staphylococcus aureus and group B streptococci) obtained by vaginal swab cultures after normal menstrual use in the experimental and control groups. Results: In total, 110 women completed the study. There were no significant differences between the groups that used either the experimental or control tampon with regard to prevalence or mean cell density for the selected microorganisms. No differences were observed in the incidence or severity of erythema, in abrasion or ulceration of the cervix, vagina, introitus, vulva or perineum, or in mean vaginal pH and discharge assessments. There were equivalent low incidences of reported symptoms such as discomfort during insertion, wear or removal, and a similar low incidence of burning, stinging or itching during use of either the control or experimental tampon. There was a more favorable overall product rating for the experimental tampon (p = 0.003). Conclusions: This approach provides a combination of gynecological, microbiological and self-reported (diary recall) methodologies in order to assess tampon safety during use more thoroughly than has previously been reported, and it supports a comparable safety profile for the experimental tampon and a currently marketed tampon.
format Text
id pubmed-1852271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18522712007-04-16 Clinical Safety-in-Use Study of a New Tampon Design Shehin, Stacey E. Jones, Michaelle B. Hochwalt, Anne E. Sarbaugh, Frank C. Nunn, Stephen Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol Research Article Objective: To confirm the safety of a new experimental Tampax(®) tampon and applicator compared with that of a currently marketed Tampax(®) tampon and applicator using comprehensive gynecological and microbiological assessments. Methods: A 2-month, single-blind, randomized, crossover study was conducted in which each subject served as her own control. Safety was evaluated by comparing potential product-related irritation (using colposcopic examination and subject diary data), assessment of vaginal discharge, vaginal pH, and effects on selected microorganisms (yeast, Escherichia coli ,Staphylococcus aureus and group B streptococci) obtained by vaginal swab cultures after normal menstrual use in the experimental and control groups. Results: In total, 110 women completed the study. There were no significant differences between the groups that used either the experimental or control tampon with regard to prevalence or mean cell density for the selected microorganisms. No differences were observed in the incidence or severity of erythema, in abrasion or ulceration of the cervix, vagina, introitus, vulva or perineum, or in mean vaginal pH and discharge assessments. There were equivalent low incidences of reported symptoms such as discomfort during insertion, wear or removal, and a similar low incidence of burning, stinging or itching during use of either the control or experimental tampon. There was a more favorable overall product rating for the experimental tampon (p = 0.003). Conclusions: This approach provides a combination of gynecological, microbiological and self-reported (diary recall) methodologies in order to assess tampon safety during use more thoroughly than has previously been reported, and it supports a comparable safety profile for the experimental tampon and a currently marketed tampon. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2003 /pmc/articles/PMC1852271/ /pubmed/14627214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10647440300025504 Text en Copyright © 2003 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shehin, Stacey E.
Jones, Michaelle B.
Hochwalt, Anne E.
Sarbaugh, Frank C.
Nunn, Stephen
Clinical Safety-in-Use Study of a New Tampon Design
title Clinical Safety-in-Use Study of a New Tampon Design
title_full Clinical Safety-in-Use Study of a New Tampon Design
title_fullStr Clinical Safety-in-Use Study of a New Tampon Design
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Safety-in-Use Study of a New Tampon Design
title_short Clinical Safety-in-Use Study of a New Tampon Design
title_sort clinical safety-in-use study of a new tampon design
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1852271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14627214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10647440300025504
work_keys_str_mv AT shehinstaceye clinicalsafetyinusestudyofanewtampondesign
AT jonesmichaelleb clinicalsafetyinusestudyofanewtampondesign
AT hochwaltannee clinicalsafetyinusestudyofanewtampondesign
AT sarbaughfrankc clinicalsafetyinusestudyofanewtampondesign
AT nunnstephen clinicalsafetyinusestudyofanewtampondesign