Cargando…

Potential cost savings with terrestrial rabies control

BACKGROUND: The cost-benefit of raccoon rabies control strategies such as oral rabies vaccination (ORV) are under evaluation. As an initial quantification of the potential cost savings for a control program, the collection of selected rabies cost data was pilot tested for five counties in New York S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Recuenco, Sergio, Cherry, Bryan, Eidson, Millicent
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1852308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17407559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-7-47
_version_ 1782133033134981120
author Recuenco, Sergio
Cherry, Bryan
Eidson, Millicent
author_facet Recuenco, Sergio
Cherry, Bryan
Eidson, Millicent
author_sort Recuenco, Sergio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The cost-benefit of raccoon rabies control strategies such as oral rabies vaccination (ORV) are under evaluation. As an initial quantification of the potential cost savings for a control program, the collection of selected rabies cost data was pilot tested for five counties in New York State (NYS) in a three-year period. METHODS: Rabies costs reported to NYS from the study counties were computerized and linked to a human rabies exposure database. Consolidated costs by county and year were averaged and compared. RESULTS: Reported rabies-associated costs for all rabies variants totalled $2.1 million, for human rabies postexposure prophylaxes (PEP) (90.9%), animal specimen preparation/shipment to laboratory (4.7%), and pet vaccination clinics (4.4%). The proportion that may be attributed to raccoon rabies control was 37% ($784,529). Average costs associated with the raccoon variant varied across counties from $440 to $1,885 per PEP, $14 to $44 per specimen, and $0.33 to $15 per pet vaccinated. CONCLUSION: Rabies costs vary widely by county in New York State, and were associated with human population size and methods used by counties to estimate costs. Rabies cost variability must be considered in developing estimates of possible ORV-related cost savings. Costs of PEPs and specimen preparation/shipments, as well as the costs of pet vaccination provided by this study may be valuable for development of more realistic scenarios in economic modelling of ORV costs versus benefits.
format Text
id pubmed-1852308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18523082007-04-17 Potential cost savings with terrestrial rabies control Recuenco, Sergio Cherry, Bryan Eidson, Millicent BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The cost-benefit of raccoon rabies control strategies such as oral rabies vaccination (ORV) are under evaluation. As an initial quantification of the potential cost savings for a control program, the collection of selected rabies cost data was pilot tested for five counties in New York State (NYS) in a three-year period. METHODS: Rabies costs reported to NYS from the study counties were computerized and linked to a human rabies exposure database. Consolidated costs by county and year were averaged and compared. RESULTS: Reported rabies-associated costs for all rabies variants totalled $2.1 million, for human rabies postexposure prophylaxes (PEP) (90.9%), animal specimen preparation/shipment to laboratory (4.7%), and pet vaccination clinics (4.4%). The proportion that may be attributed to raccoon rabies control was 37% ($784,529). Average costs associated with the raccoon variant varied across counties from $440 to $1,885 per PEP, $14 to $44 per specimen, and $0.33 to $15 per pet vaccinated. CONCLUSION: Rabies costs vary widely by county in New York State, and were associated with human population size and methods used by counties to estimate costs. Rabies cost variability must be considered in developing estimates of possible ORV-related cost savings. Costs of PEPs and specimen preparation/shipments, as well as the costs of pet vaccination provided by this study may be valuable for development of more realistic scenarios in economic modelling of ORV costs versus benefits. BioMed Central 2007-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC1852308/ /pubmed/17407559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-7-47 Text en Copyright © 2007 Recuenco et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Recuenco, Sergio
Cherry, Bryan
Eidson, Millicent
Potential cost savings with terrestrial rabies control
title Potential cost savings with terrestrial rabies control
title_full Potential cost savings with terrestrial rabies control
title_fullStr Potential cost savings with terrestrial rabies control
title_full_unstemmed Potential cost savings with terrestrial rabies control
title_short Potential cost savings with terrestrial rabies control
title_sort potential cost savings with terrestrial rabies control
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1852308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17407559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-7-47
work_keys_str_mv AT recuencosergio potentialcostsavingswithterrestrialrabiescontrol
AT cherrybryan potentialcostsavingswithterrestrialrabiescontrol
AT eidsonmillicent potentialcostsavingswithterrestrialrabiescontrol