Cargando…
Decisions by regulatory agencies: are they evidence-based?
Contradictory statements about the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs from the European Medicines Agency and the United States Food and Drug Administration have raised questions about whether regulatory decisions are evidence-based. For the selective COX-2 inhibitors, there are clear contraindica...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1852571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17428328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-8-13 |
_version_ | 1782133063439876096 |
---|---|
author | Furberg, Curt D |
author_facet | Furberg, Curt D |
author_sort | Furberg, Curt D |
collection | PubMed |
description | Contradictory statements about the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs from the European Medicines Agency and the United States Food and Drug Administration have raised questions about whether regulatory decisions are evidence-based. For the selective COX-2 inhibitors, there are clear contraindications and warnings in Europe, but only a vaguely worded Black Box warning in the United States. All the non-selective agents are given an almost "clean bill of health" in Europe, while all of them are judged to have a similar risk-benefit ratio as celecoxib in the United States. The regulatory agencies have failed to recognize the clinical trial evidence that the risk of cardiovascular events varies substantially among the non-selective agents, with diclofenac carrying the highest risk of harm. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1852571 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-18525712007-04-18 Decisions by regulatory agencies: are they evidence-based? Furberg, Curt D Trials Commentary Contradictory statements about the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs from the European Medicines Agency and the United States Food and Drug Administration have raised questions about whether regulatory decisions are evidence-based. For the selective COX-2 inhibitors, there are clear contraindications and warnings in Europe, but only a vaguely worded Black Box warning in the United States. All the non-selective agents are given an almost "clean bill of health" in Europe, while all of them are judged to have a similar risk-benefit ratio as celecoxib in the United States. The regulatory agencies have failed to recognize the clinical trial evidence that the risk of cardiovascular events varies substantially among the non-selective agents, with diclofenac carrying the highest risk of harm. BioMed Central 2007-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC1852571/ /pubmed/17428328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-8-13 Text en Copyright © 2007 Furberg; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Furberg, Curt D Decisions by regulatory agencies: are they evidence-based? |
title | Decisions by regulatory agencies: are they evidence-based? |
title_full | Decisions by regulatory agencies: are they evidence-based? |
title_fullStr | Decisions by regulatory agencies: are they evidence-based? |
title_full_unstemmed | Decisions by regulatory agencies: are they evidence-based? |
title_short | Decisions by regulatory agencies: are they evidence-based? |
title_sort | decisions by regulatory agencies: are they evidence-based? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1852571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17428328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-8-13 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT furbergcurtd decisionsbyregulatoryagenciesaretheyevidencebased |