Cargando…

Decisions by regulatory agencies: are they evidence-based?

Contradictory statements about the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs from the European Medicines Agency and the United States Food and Drug Administration have raised questions about whether regulatory decisions are evidence-based. For the selective COX-2 inhibitors, there are clear contraindica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Furberg, Curt D
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1852571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17428328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-8-13
_version_ 1782133063439876096
author Furberg, Curt D
author_facet Furberg, Curt D
author_sort Furberg, Curt D
collection PubMed
description Contradictory statements about the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs from the European Medicines Agency and the United States Food and Drug Administration have raised questions about whether regulatory decisions are evidence-based. For the selective COX-2 inhibitors, there are clear contraindications and warnings in Europe, but only a vaguely worded Black Box warning in the United States. All the non-selective agents are given an almost "clean bill of health" in Europe, while all of them are judged to have a similar risk-benefit ratio as celecoxib in the United States. The regulatory agencies have failed to recognize the clinical trial evidence that the risk of cardiovascular events varies substantially among the non-selective agents, with diclofenac carrying the highest risk of harm.
format Text
id pubmed-1852571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18525712007-04-18 Decisions by regulatory agencies: are they evidence-based? Furberg, Curt D Trials Commentary Contradictory statements about the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs from the European Medicines Agency and the United States Food and Drug Administration have raised questions about whether regulatory decisions are evidence-based. For the selective COX-2 inhibitors, there are clear contraindications and warnings in Europe, but only a vaguely worded Black Box warning in the United States. All the non-selective agents are given an almost "clean bill of health" in Europe, while all of them are judged to have a similar risk-benefit ratio as celecoxib in the United States. The regulatory agencies have failed to recognize the clinical trial evidence that the risk of cardiovascular events varies substantially among the non-selective agents, with diclofenac carrying the highest risk of harm. BioMed Central 2007-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC1852571/ /pubmed/17428328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-8-13 Text en Copyright © 2007 Furberg; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Commentary
Furberg, Curt D
Decisions by regulatory agencies: are they evidence-based?
title Decisions by regulatory agencies: are they evidence-based?
title_full Decisions by regulatory agencies: are they evidence-based?
title_fullStr Decisions by regulatory agencies: are they evidence-based?
title_full_unstemmed Decisions by regulatory agencies: are they evidence-based?
title_short Decisions by regulatory agencies: are they evidence-based?
title_sort decisions by regulatory agencies: are they evidence-based?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1852571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17428328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-8-13
work_keys_str_mv AT furbergcurtd decisionsbyregulatoryagenciesaretheyevidencebased