Cargando…

What’s in a Name? Use of Brand versus Generic Drug Names in United States Outpatient Practice

BACKGROUND: The use of brand rather than generic names for medications can increase health care costs. However, little is known at a national level about how often physicians refer to drugs using their brand or generic names. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how often physicians refer to drugs using brand or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steinman, Michael A., Chren, Mary-Margaret, Landefeld, C. Seth
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1852907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17443372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-006-0074-3
_version_ 1782133092010426368
author Steinman, Michael A.
Chren, Mary-Margaret
Landefeld, C. Seth
author_facet Steinman, Michael A.
Chren, Mary-Margaret
Landefeld, C. Seth
author_sort Steinman, Michael A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of brand rather than generic names for medications can increase health care costs. However, little is known at a national level about how often physicians refer to drugs using their brand or generic names. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how often physicians refer to drugs using brand or generic terminology. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: We used data from the 2003 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS), a nationally representative survey of 25,288 community-based outpatient visits in the United States. After each visit, patient medications were recorded on a survey encounter form by the treating physician or transcribed from office notes. MEASUREMENTS: Our main outcome measure was the frequency with which medications were recorded on the encounter form using their brand or generic names. RESULTS: For 20 commonly used drugs, the median frequency of brand name use was 98% (interquartile range, 81–100%). Among 12 medications with no generic competition at the time of the survey, the median frequency of brand name use was 100% (range 92–100%). Among 8 medications with generic competition at the time of the survey (“multisource” drugs), the median frequency of brand name use was 79% (range 0–98%; P < .001 for difference between drugs with and without generic competition). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians refer to most medications by their brand names, including drugs with generic formulations. This may lead to higher health care costs by promoting the use of brand-name products when generic alternatives are available.
format Text
id pubmed-1852907
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-18529072008-04-30 What’s in a Name? Use of Brand versus Generic Drug Names in United States Outpatient Practice Steinman, Michael A. Chren, Mary-Margaret Landefeld, C. Seth J Gen Intern Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The use of brand rather than generic names for medications can increase health care costs. However, little is known at a national level about how often physicians refer to drugs using their brand or generic names. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how often physicians refer to drugs using brand or generic terminology. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: We used data from the 2003 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS), a nationally representative survey of 25,288 community-based outpatient visits in the United States. After each visit, patient medications were recorded on a survey encounter form by the treating physician or transcribed from office notes. MEASUREMENTS: Our main outcome measure was the frequency with which medications were recorded on the encounter form using their brand or generic names. RESULTS: For 20 commonly used drugs, the median frequency of brand name use was 98% (interquartile range, 81–100%). Among 12 medications with no generic competition at the time of the survey, the median frequency of brand name use was 100% (range 92–100%). Among 8 medications with generic competition at the time of the survey (“multisource” drugs), the median frequency of brand name use was 79% (range 0–98%; P < .001 for difference between drugs with and without generic competition). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians refer to most medications by their brand names, including drugs with generic formulations. This may lead to higher health care costs by promoting the use of brand-name products when generic alternatives are available. Springer-Verlag 2007-01-10 2007-05 /pmc/articles/PMC1852907/ /pubmed/17443372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-006-0074-3 Text en © Society of General Internal Medicine 2007
spellingShingle Original Article
Steinman, Michael A.
Chren, Mary-Margaret
Landefeld, C. Seth
What’s in a Name? Use of Brand versus Generic Drug Names in United States Outpatient Practice
title What’s in a Name? Use of Brand versus Generic Drug Names in United States Outpatient Practice
title_full What’s in a Name? Use of Brand versus Generic Drug Names in United States Outpatient Practice
title_fullStr What’s in a Name? Use of Brand versus Generic Drug Names in United States Outpatient Practice
title_full_unstemmed What’s in a Name? Use of Brand versus Generic Drug Names in United States Outpatient Practice
title_short What’s in a Name? Use of Brand versus Generic Drug Names in United States Outpatient Practice
title_sort what’s in a name? use of brand versus generic drug names in united states outpatient practice
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1852907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17443372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-006-0074-3
work_keys_str_mv AT steinmanmichaela whatsinanameuseofbrandversusgenericdrugnamesinunitedstatesoutpatientpractice
AT chrenmarymargaret whatsinanameuseofbrandversusgenericdrugnamesinunitedstatesoutpatientpractice
AT landefeldcseth whatsinanameuseofbrandversusgenericdrugnamesinunitedstatesoutpatientpractice