Cargando…
What’s in a Name? Use of Brand versus Generic Drug Names in United States Outpatient Practice
BACKGROUND: The use of brand rather than generic names for medications can increase health care costs. However, little is known at a national level about how often physicians refer to drugs using their brand or generic names. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how often physicians refer to drugs using brand or...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1852907/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17443372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-006-0074-3 |
_version_ | 1782133092010426368 |
---|---|
author | Steinman, Michael A. Chren, Mary-Margaret Landefeld, C. Seth |
author_facet | Steinman, Michael A. Chren, Mary-Margaret Landefeld, C. Seth |
author_sort | Steinman, Michael A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of brand rather than generic names for medications can increase health care costs. However, little is known at a national level about how often physicians refer to drugs using their brand or generic names. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how often physicians refer to drugs using brand or generic terminology. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: We used data from the 2003 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS), a nationally representative survey of 25,288 community-based outpatient visits in the United States. After each visit, patient medications were recorded on a survey encounter form by the treating physician or transcribed from office notes. MEASUREMENTS: Our main outcome measure was the frequency with which medications were recorded on the encounter form using their brand or generic names. RESULTS: For 20 commonly used drugs, the median frequency of brand name use was 98% (interquartile range, 81–100%). Among 12 medications with no generic competition at the time of the survey, the median frequency of brand name use was 100% (range 92–100%). Among 8 medications with generic competition at the time of the survey (“multisource” drugs), the median frequency of brand name use was 79% (range 0–98%; P < .001 for difference between drugs with and without generic competition). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians refer to most medications by their brand names, including drugs with generic formulations. This may lead to higher health care costs by promoting the use of brand-name products when generic alternatives are available. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1852907 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-18529072008-04-30 What’s in a Name? Use of Brand versus Generic Drug Names in United States Outpatient Practice Steinman, Michael A. Chren, Mary-Margaret Landefeld, C. Seth J Gen Intern Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The use of brand rather than generic names for medications can increase health care costs. However, little is known at a national level about how often physicians refer to drugs using their brand or generic names. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how often physicians refer to drugs using brand or generic terminology. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: We used data from the 2003 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS), a nationally representative survey of 25,288 community-based outpatient visits in the United States. After each visit, patient medications were recorded on a survey encounter form by the treating physician or transcribed from office notes. MEASUREMENTS: Our main outcome measure was the frequency with which medications were recorded on the encounter form using their brand or generic names. RESULTS: For 20 commonly used drugs, the median frequency of brand name use was 98% (interquartile range, 81–100%). Among 12 medications with no generic competition at the time of the survey, the median frequency of brand name use was 100% (range 92–100%). Among 8 medications with generic competition at the time of the survey (“multisource” drugs), the median frequency of brand name use was 79% (range 0–98%; P < .001 for difference between drugs with and without generic competition). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians refer to most medications by their brand names, including drugs with generic formulations. This may lead to higher health care costs by promoting the use of brand-name products when generic alternatives are available. Springer-Verlag 2007-01-10 2007-05 /pmc/articles/PMC1852907/ /pubmed/17443372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-006-0074-3 Text en © Society of General Internal Medicine 2007 |
spellingShingle | Original Article Steinman, Michael A. Chren, Mary-Margaret Landefeld, C. Seth What’s in a Name? Use of Brand versus Generic Drug Names in United States Outpatient Practice |
title | What’s in a Name? Use of Brand versus Generic Drug Names in United States Outpatient Practice |
title_full | What’s in a Name? Use of Brand versus Generic Drug Names in United States Outpatient Practice |
title_fullStr | What’s in a Name? Use of Brand versus Generic Drug Names in United States Outpatient Practice |
title_full_unstemmed | What’s in a Name? Use of Brand versus Generic Drug Names in United States Outpatient Practice |
title_short | What’s in a Name? Use of Brand versus Generic Drug Names in United States Outpatient Practice |
title_sort | what’s in a name? use of brand versus generic drug names in united states outpatient practice |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1852907/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17443372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-006-0074-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steinmanmichaela whatsinanameuseofbrandversusgenericdrugnamesinunitedstatesoutpatientpractice AT chrenmarymargaret whatsinanameuseofbrandversusgenericdrugnamesinunitedstatesoutpatientpractice AT landefeldcseth whatsinanameuseofbrandversusgenericdrugnamesinunitedstatesoutpatientpractice |